tommasoamici
I’ve got an annoying problem on my hands. I’m open to a different approach as well.
I’m writing a GenServer to store a live auction, when bids are submitted they’re stored in the database with Ash actions and the GenServer picks them up from PubSub.
I want to introduce a recovery mechanism so that if a GenServer crashes it can reload from the database and continue working. My current implementation does this in the GenServer.init/1 callback.
I’m writing tests for this and something that I can’t figure out is: when a GenServer is killed, the DynamicSupervisor will restart it and it will run the init/1 again. So far so good.
However, the new process has a different PID and Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox doesn’t allow connecting from it. I want to avoid :shared mode so tests can be async.
At this point there’s a race condition: when starting up the GenServer wants to hit the database and it can’t so it crashes.
I can’t allow the new PID because I don’t know what it is and by the time I look it up in the registry, it’s already crashed ![]()
Has anyone managed to instrument tests for this scenario? Ideally without polluting the application code with these implementation details.
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
An approach I’ve used is passing the test process’s PID along when starting the child in
DynamicSupervisor.The
GenServerthen callsEcto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.allow(YourRepo, parent_pid, self())I don’t know if there’s an “official” way to ask the repo “are you sandbox”; there wasn’t when I wrote the code using this feature, so I did it by checking
Application.fetch_env!(:your_app_name, YourRepo)[:pool]- if it’s the atomEcto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox, then the sandbox is enabled.While your GenServer is doing that, another useful thing to add is
Process.monitor(parent_pid). That allows avoiding two race-for-the-flag scenarios that spam the logs and crash unexpectedly:GenServeris still running, subsequent Repo interactions will raise an error. Once you’re monitoringparent_pid, theGenServercan take appropriate action when the:DOWNmessage arrives. Usually that action is to return:stop, but you may also have cleanup to do.GenServercrashes at just the wrong time, theDynamicSupervisorwill restart it after the test process has already exited. Again, this will cause any Repo interaction in theGenServerto fail.One other note: make sure you’ve tuned the restart parameters of
DynamicSupervisorcorrectly, especially when running fast tests in parallel. Nothing more frustrating than trying to figure out why your tests fail randomly, but only when all run together, and only on a fast machine…martosaur
Make your genserver set
:$callerskey in process dictionary and Ecto sandbox should be able to figure ownership. More info on caller tracking: Task — Elixir v1.20.2basically, you’ll have something like this:
jswanner
This is my preferred approach as well, and it works for tests because
:"$callers"is already set in the test processtommasoamici
that’s a really elegant solution, thanks!