amos-kibet

amos-kibet

I have a form that I use to add users to an organization, that looks like this:

The problem:
Clicking on the Add User button takes a few milliseconds (~500ms) before the input fields are displayed, and the delay compounds as I add more users. Note that clicking that button sends a validate event to the server.
Checking the server logs, validation happens for all of the already filled fields. I’m not sure if that’s expected, or I’m doing something wrong in the code. It feels redundant to re-validate all the fields; I expect validation to happen only for the field in focus, but maybe it’s how inputs_for/1 works.

This is my changeset function:

 def invite_changeset(organization, attrs) do
    organization
    |> cast(attrs, [])
    |> cast_assoc(:users,
      with: &User.invitation_changeset/2,
      sort_param: :users_sort,
      drop_param: :users_drop
    )
  end

What I have tried so far:
I am preloading :users that cast_assoc/3 is using. I have tried not running validations untill the form is submitted, but that doesn’t work with inputs_for/1; the form is not being rendered when I click on Add User button on the UI. Also tried providing a changeset that has no validations (just casting) when validating, but the delay is still there, even though cast_assoc/3 does no validation, just casting the params.

The question:
Honestly, I am not entirely sure what the cause of the delay is, but I suspect it is the changeset validation. How can I fix this delay?

First 2 of 2 Posts Switch mode

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

That’s how changesets work. They compare the base state with the complete set of changes in the form. There is no partial validation as changesets do not support any partial delivery of changes nor revalidation (as in removing errors) of already validated fields.

Additionally inputs_for is not granularly change tracked like individual root level inputs. This is a known limitation of how inputs_for is implemented.

amos-kibet

amos-kibet OP

Turns out the delay was being caused by a password hashing step, done by Bcrypt. Skipping it during form validation, and only running it during form submission solved the issue.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
jonnycharles
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
spammy
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
silverdr
Using Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine as an EEx.Engine is deprecated! To compile HEEx, use Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine.compile/2 instead. Sta...
New
dli
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app? Looking for hints regarding: Addi...
New
bottlenecked
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps. Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
michallepicki
I am using Oban and occasionally, shortly after a deployment, a handful of jobs can fail because of dependency on other parts of the syst...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
type1fool
I just stumbled on a newly redesigned elixir-lang.org. :tada: It looks like @Software_Mansion did the work, and I think it is generally a...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement