fireproofsocks
Forgive me if this is obvious, but how does one delete a database record WITHOUT selecting it first? Ecto.Repo — Ecto v3.14.0 has examples, but they are all doing 2 operations: a select, then a delete.
In the interest of optimization, is it possible with Ecto to delete a record with a single operation? Something like the SQL query DELETE FROM my_table WHERE id=123 ?
Is it considered bad form to delete without selecting first?
Thanks for pointers, as always.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
Adzz
Ypu can do something like this:
That is just build a struct with the id in it then delete
OvermindDL1
Can also look at
repo.delete_all/2, it accepts a query for doing just that.xlphs
from(x in DataModel, where: x.id == ^id) |> Repo.delete_allfireproofsocks
I tried that, but that generates an error:
** (Ecto.StaleEntryError) attempted to delete a stale structAdzz
I think that will only do that if the id you gave it doesn’t exist in the db… maybe it was already deleted?
OvermindDL1
From the docs:
So yep, looks like you are right.
fireproofsocks
Thank you! Just to show a more thorough example:
You might get zero as the number of rows deleted.
Huolong
I think you have to do a query to pass existing rows to delete or delete_all,
because they require the Ecto metadata element of the struct to contain the ‘loaded’ flag.
The only alternative would be to completely fake the whole struct,
including all the internal fields and flags.
But I agree with you that there should be a version of delete,
which just takes a primary key value, by analogy with the ‘get’ function.