onomated

onomated

Ecto embedded_schema storing extra/default values for fields that aren't specified

I’m in the process of migrating a codebase and accompanying data to Elixir/Ecto, and I notice that my embedded schema (backed by jsonb columns) now include all fields defined in the schema, even when values for those fields are not provided.

Consider the following data model:

Asset model to hold info regarding an attachment asset. Not all info will be known/provided:

defmodule Asset do
  use Ecto.Schema

  @primary_key false

  embedded_schema do
    field :url, :string
    field :filename, :string
    field :mime_type, :string
    field :size, :integer
    field :width, :integer
    field :height, :integer
  end

  def changeset(asset, attrs) do
    asset
    |> cast(attrs, [:url, :mime_type, :width, :height])
  end
end

Attachment model holds info regarding media attachments which includes different assets of varying “editions” i.e. original and derived editions of the asset such as thumbnails, medium squares etc

defmodule Attachment do
  use Ecto.Schema

  schema "attachments" do
    field :attachment_provider, AttachmentProvider
    field :attachment_type, AttachmentType

    field :attached_count, :integer, read_after_writes: true

    timestamps(updated_at: false)

    embeds_one :content_data, ContentData, on_replace: :delete, primary_key: false do
      field :provider_id, :string
      
      embeds_one :original, Asset
      embeds_one :full, Asset
      embeds_one :medium, Asset
      embeds_one :thumb, Asset
    end
  end

Attachments may come from direct user uploads, or third party links. With third party links there are no editions. On saving third party links with no editions:

attrs = %{
          attachment_provider: :some_provider,
          attachment_type: :image,
          content_data: %{
            provider_id: "deadbeef",
            original: %{
              url: "https://example.com/image-link"
            }
          }
        }

%Attachment{}
    |> change(attrs)
    |> Repo.insert!()

This results in the following jsonb content_data column data:

{
  "full": null,
  "thumb": null,
  "medium": null,
  "original": {
    "url": "https://example.com/image-link",
    "size": null,
    "width": null,
    "height": null,
    "filename": null,
    "mime_type": null
  },
  "provider_id": "deadbeef"
}

Is there a way to get this to store just the provided data? So the goal here is to store the following only:

{
  "original": {
    "url": "https://example.com/image-link"
  },
  "provider_id": "deadbeef"
}

Take another example, where there are editions provided, but not all the fields are known:

attrs = %{
          attachment_provider: :us,
          attachment_type: :image,
          content_data: %{
            full: %{
              url: "https://example.com/our-uploads-full.jpg",
              filename: "our-uploads-full.jpg",
              mime_type: "image/jpeg"
            },
            medium: %{
              url: "https://example.com/our-uploads-med.jpg",
              filename: "our-uploads-med.jpg",
              mime_type: "image/jpeg"
            },
            thumb: %{
              url: "https://example.com/our-uploads-thumb.jpg",
              filename: "our-uploads-thumb.jpg",
              mime_type: "image/jpeg"
            }
          }
        }

%Attachment{}
    |> change(attrs)
    |> Repo.insert!()

The resulting jsonb content_data column data is:

{
  "full": {
    "url": "https://example.com/our-uploads-full.jpg",
    "size": null,
    "width": null,
    "height": null,
    "filename": "our-uploads-full.jpg",
    "mime_type": "image/jpeg"
  },
  "thumb": {
    "url": "https://example.com/our-uploads-thumb.jpg",
    "size": null,
    "width": null,
    "height": null,
    "filename": "our-uploads-thumb.jpg",
    "mime_type": "image/jpeg"
  },
  "medium": {
    "url": "https://example.com/our-uploads-med.jpg",
    "size": null,
    "width": null,
    "height": null,
    "filename": "our-uploads-med.jpg",
    "mime_type": "image/jpeg"
  },
  "original": null,
  "provider_id": null
}

vs:

{
  "full": {
    "url": "https://example.com/our-uploads-full.jpg",
    "filename": "our-uploads-full.jpg",
    "mime_type": "image/jpeg"
  },
  "thumb": {
    "url": "https://example.com/our-uploads-thumb.jpg",
    "filename": "our-uploads-thumb.jpg",
    "mime_type": "image/jpeg"
  },
  "medium": {
    "url": "https://example.com/our-uploads-med.jpg",
    "filename": "our-uploads-med.jpg",
    "mime_type": "image/jpeg"
  }
}

This results in a ton of extra space taken for millions of records. I feel I can accomplish what I need by storing raw maps, but would like to harness the utilities of schemas i.e. validation, custom types etc. Is this possible with embedded schemas?

Most Liked

onomated

onomated

Agreed, as I absolutely like that schema is enforced. I think the semantics I bring up here is how “empty/non-existent” is represented in the actual DB storage. The rails codebase I’m migrating from enforced jsonb schema, but represented empty (which is different from null), as truly empty in the storage.
But Ecto was awesome enough for me to get to the representation I desired. Here’s the custom type I created, which was inspired by the links I shared earlier. Only disadvantage of using the map type is that I cannot represent incremental additions to the stored data. Its all or nothing.

defmodule Ecto.CompactEmbed do
  @moduledoc """
  Custom ecto type for embedded map types that get compacted on saving to data.
  "Raw" ecto embedded schemas include all fields in the json representation in the database even if the field is not specified.
  This compacts the json fields by removing all null fields or applying the supplied `:on_compact` option.

  For more discussion see https://forum.elixirforum.com/t/ecto-embedded-schema-storing-extra-default-values-for-fields-that-arent-specified/35739

  ## Options

    * `:schema` (*Required*) - The (embedded) schema module would otherwise have been specified as the field type.
      By default the schema's changeset/2 function is used to cast the data if provided.
      Otherwise the data is casted to only include the fields defined.

    * `:on_compact` - The function that is invoked to compact the map data before writing to the database.
      This must be function with an arity of 1 that takes the schema map data and compacts/modifies it.
      An MFA tuple may be passed as well.  For example `on_compact: {Utils, :remove_empty}` or `on_compact: {Utils, :remove_empty, []}`
      If this is not specified, all null fields will be removed by default

  ## Example:
    # Define schema of compacted embed
    defmodule Asset do
      use Ecto.Schema

      @primary_key false

      embedded_schema do
        field :url, :string
        field :filename, :string
        field :mime_type, :string
        field :size, :integer
        field :width, :integer
        field :height, :integer
      end
    end

    # Use in schema field
    defmodule Attachment do
      use Ecto.Schema

      schema "attachments" do
        field :asset, Ecto.CompactEmbed, schema: Asset
      end
  """

  # Loosely modeled after:
  #   https://github.com/elixir-ecto/ecto/blob/master/lib/ecto/embedded.ex
  #   https://github.com/mathieuprog/polymorphic_embed/blob/master/lib/polymorphic_embed.ex

  use Ecto.ParameterizedType

  alias __MODULE__

  @type t :: %CompactEmbed{
          schema: Ecto.Schema.t(),
          on_compact: fun() | {module(), atom()} | {module(), atom(), []}
        }
  defstruct [:schema, :on_compact]

  ## Type behavior

  @impl true
  def type(_params), do: :map

  @impl true
  def init(opts) do
    schema = Keyword.fetch!(opts, :schema)
    on_compact = opts[:on_compact]

    on_compact =
      case on_compact do
        nil ->
          &Utils.Presence.sans_nil(&1)

        {mod, fun} when is_atom(mod) and is_atom(fun) ->
          fn map ->
            apply(mod, fun, [map])
          end

        {mod, fun, []} when is_atom(mod) and is_atom(fun) ->
          fn map ->
            apply(mod, fun, [map])
          end

        compacter when is_function(compacter, 1) ->
          compacter

        _ ->
          raise ArgumentError,
                "invalid `:on_compact` option for #{inspect(on_compact)}. " <>
                  "This must be a function with an arity of 1 that takes a map and returns the compacted/modified map." <>
                  "An MFA may be passed as well.  For example `on_compact: {Utils, :remove_empty}` or `on_compact: {Utils, :remove_empty, []}`"
      end

    %CompactEmbed{schema: schema, on_compact: on_compact}
  end

  @impl true
  def cast(nil, _), do: {:ok, nil}

  def cast(attrs, %{schema: schema}) do
    schema
    |> cast_to_changeset(attrs)
    |> case do
      %{valid?: true} = changeset ->
        {:ok, Ecto.Changeset.apply_changes(changeset)}

      changeset ->
        {:error, build_errors(changeset)}
    end
  end

  @impl true
  def load(nil, _loader, _params), do: {:ok, nil}

  def load(data, _loader, %{schema: schema}) do
    struct =
      cast_to_changeset(schema, data)
      |> Ecto.Changeset.apply_changes()

    {:ok, struct}
  end

  @impl true
  def dump(nil, _dumber, _params), do: {:ok, nil}

  def dump(data, _dumper, %{on_compact: on_compact}) do
    case Ecto.Type.dump(:map, data) do
      {:ok, map} -> {:ok, compact_map(map, on_compact)}
      error -> error
    end
  end

  @impl true
  def embed_as(_, _), do: :dump

  @impl true
  def equal?(term1, term2, %{on_compact: on_compact}) when is_map(term1) and is_map(term2) do
    case MapDiff.diff(compact_map(term1, on_compact), compact_map(term2, on_compact)) do
      %{changed: :equal} -> true
      _ -> false
    end
  end

  def equal?(term1, term2, _params), do: term1 == term2

  ## Privates

  defp cast_to_changeset(%schema{} = struct, attrs) do
    if function_exported?(schema, :changeset, 2) do
      schema.changeset(struct, attrs)
    else
      embed_fields = schema.__schema__(:embeds)
      non_embed_fields = schema.__schema__(:fields) -- embed_fields

      Ecto.Changeset.cast(struct, attrs, non_embed_fields)
      |> cast_embeds_to_changeset(embed_fields)
    end
  end

  defp cast_to_changeset(module, attrs) when is_atom(module) do
    cast_to_changeset(struct(module), attrs)
  end

  defp cast_embeds_to_changeset(changeset, embed_fields) do
    Enum.reduce(embed_fields, changeset, fn embed_field, changeset ->
      Ecto.Changeset.cast_embed(
        changeset,
        embed_field,
        with: fn embed_struct, data ->
          cast_to_changeset(embed_struct, data)
        end
      )
    end)
  end

  defp compact_map(%_module{} = struct, on_compact) do
    struct
    |> Map.from_struct()
    |> compact_map(on_compact)
  end

  defp compact_map(map, on_compact) when is_map(map), do: on_compact.(map)

  defp build_errors(%{errors: errors, changes: changes}) do
    Enum.reduce(changes, errors, fn {field, value}, all_errors ->
      case value do
        %Ecto.Changeset{} = changeset ->
          Keyword.merge([{field, {"is invalid", changeset.errors}}], all_errors)

        _ ->
          all_errors
      end
    end)
  end
end

onomated

onomated

Oh yes! I meant to contribute this as a hex package. Only hesitation is that I haven’t released a hex package before. It ended up being a couple of modules that took heavy inspiration from Ecto embeds, and it’s been working great. Let me see if I can find guidance on releasing hex packages so I can release as version 0.0.1 and refine as others try it out

onomated

onomated

I haven’t measured. But jsonb (i.e. binary json) columns store not only “null” as values (which are likely optimized), but also the corresponding map keys (i.e. field names) for every record. These keys don’t hold any useful information, so still a waste. My particular case above is just one permutation of several factors i.e. number of fields in embeds and number of records. And I’m migrating data from another platform where json was “structured” but didn’t have the unneeded fields stored in the columns. So that’s driving my expectations here. I can measure and report something quantitative, but on a fundamental level, feels like having only the specified fields in the data is not a stretch of expectation

Where Next?

Popular in Questions Top

aadeshere1
I have a another noob question about loop. Since elixir is immutable, while loop is not directly possible. total = 10 while total != 0 ...
New
vertexbuffer
Hello, can anybody help here..? I have a list of players and I what to delete an element, but every for loop the list is reverting to ori...
New
greenz1
I have a phoenix application from which a user can download multiple(5-6) files of size 1MB. I couldn’t find anything related to sending ...
New
fireproofsocks
I’m working on defining a simple Ecto schema for a table (in PostGres), but I don’t see where I can define a column as NOT NULL. Conside...
New
ovidiubadita
Hey all, I discovered Elixir and I love it. I always wanted to learn a functional programming and I intended to go for Haskell, but afte...
New
LegitStack
I’m trying to make a websocket server in Phoenix or raw Elixir. I heard about gun, I think I could use cowboy, but since I’m not that sma...
New
Lily
In templates/appointment/index.html.eex: &lt;%= for appointment &lt;- @appointments do %&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td&gt;&lt;%= appoi...
New
vegabook
I’m brand new to Phoenix and I have stripped one of the demo applications to the bone. I just want to get an svg up on the screen. Here i...
New
script
If I have a string “1000 cfu/ml” . I want to remove the characters and / and space . So the string is like this "1000" What is the ...
New
jononomo
For some reason my phoenix channels are working for me in my local dev environment, but as soon as I deploy via Docker, I get a 403 error...
New

Other popular topics Top

JakeBecker
TL;DR: I’ve just released an implementation of Microsoft’s IDE-independent Language Server Protocol for Elixir. It adds language support ...
1144 53690 245
New
hariharasudhan94
lets say i have a sample like a = 20; b = 10; if (a &gt; b) do {:ok, "a"} end if (a &lt; b) do {:ok, b} end if (a == b) do {:ok, "equa...
New
AngeloChecked
What learn first? Rust or Elixir Hi Elixir community! I’m here because i want learn a new language. I’m a junior developer and mainly i ...
New
baxterw3b
Hi guys, i’m new in the Elixir world, and i have to say, that i love it! i’m having some problem to understand anonymous functions with ...
New
SoCreat
i’m a new one to elixir which editor can i use vs code? or atom? Thanks! :smiley:
New
ashish173
I am using Ecto timestamps with postgres, I can see the timestamps() use the :naive_dateime but for my use case I wanted to store the ti...
New
romenigld
I am trying to run a deploy with docker and I successfully runned with this command: docker build -t romenigld/blog-prod . but when I t...
New
hariharasudhan94
I would like to know what is the best IDE for elixir development?
New
jononomo
For some reason my phoenix channels are working for me in my local dev environment, but as soon as I deploy via Docker, I get a 403 error...
New
svb
Hi! Currently I want to submit a form by pressing the Enter key. However, since my input field is of type “textarea” this is just adds a...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement