silverdr

silverdr

I have a Parent model, which embeds_many() children models. Children are then stored in a jsonb column as a List (Array in JSON) of simple, two-key maps (Objects), where values of one of the keys of those maps need to be unique. Something like:

[
	{"name":"name0", "amount":"10.00"},
	{"name":"name1", "amount":"12.20"},
	{"name":"name2", "amount":"10.00"},
	[…]
	{"name":"nameN", "amount":"56.00"}
]

Value of name has to be unique. I handled the uniqueness on create/update and this works. But then I continuously spend cycles all around the application converting the retrieved list into a single map like:

%{
	"name0" => "10.00",
	"name1" => "12.20",
	"name2" => "10.00",
	[…]
	"nameN" => "56.00"
}

Any suggestions for a “proper” way to get the data stored as a single map (JSON object), while retaining the possibility to use Phoenix form helpers / inputs_for, validations and other goodies?

Custom Ecto type? Or? Some examples, maybe?

Showing Posts 1 to 6

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

This is full of caveats:

  • inputs_for only works for related assocs or embeds, which are one or a list of related records. There’s nothing like a map for related records.
  • The :map or {:map, value_type} native types of ecto are not supported by phoenix form handling natively. You can make things work by manually creating input names and assigning values to inputs, but it’s not covered ootb. Also using an ecto type over a relationship means you forego a bunch of their features like e.g. per item errors, sort/drop support, likely a few more…
  • How do you even model a “map” using form inputs in an abstract manner in the first place. There’s surely many specific examples of how to do that, but I’m not sure there’s a generic version phoenix could implement.

So really I’d treat the data like you do and let the goal of it becoming a map be an implementation detail. You could consider separating the “write model” from the “read model” here and let the read model read the data from the db in the correct format / into a :map field.

silverdr

silverdr OP

Thank you, Benjamin. I spent good part of the day trying to figure something reasonable out and I ran into basically all the caveats you listed with no apparent solution. At least none that would not make things even more smelly than they are now.

One thing made me curious though. Since I have the write part working, and the main problem is with the fact that I read the data in the form it is stored (i. e. as List of Maps rather than a Map), then – maybe – the separation of models you mentioned is worth checking.

How does one do this? Any examples or links to documentation?

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

Something like this:

defmodule MapFromArray do
  use Ecto.Type

  def type, do: {:array, :map}

  def load(data) do
    with {:ok, list} <- Ecto.Type.load(type(), data) do
      {:ok, Map.new(list, &{&1["name"], &1["amount"]})}
    end
  end

  def embed_as(_), do: :dump

  […]
end

defmodule ReadParent do
  use Ecto.Schema

  schema "parents" do
    field :children, MapFromArray
  end
end
  
  
Repo.insert_all("parents", [
  %{children: [%{name: "abc", amount: 2}, %{name: "def", amount: 5}]}
])

[%{children: %{"abc" => 2, "def" => 5}}] = Repo.all(ReadParent)

Could even consider Ecto.ParameterizedType if you don’t like hardcoding key/value keys.

MarcusRiemer

MarcusRiemer

I’m in a similar situation right now and did something similar as suggested here: I expect every module that is used as the value type to define a new function and call that in order to load the data which currently means to call MyModule.changeset and Ecto.Changeset.apply_changes. The data will always be transformed from a JSON list representation:

field(:entities, EctoSupport.EmbeddedMap,
  value: Entity,
  key_name: :name,
  default: %{}
)

In this usage example Entity would need to define a new/1 function which converts the given map to a struct. And the returned struct must have field called name which will serve as the key when transforming from List to Map.

The actual implementation of EctoSupport.EmbeddedMap looks like this:

defmodule EctoSupport.EmbeddedMap do
  use Ecto.ParameterizedType

  def type(_params), do: :array

  def init(opts) do
    Code.ensure_compiled!(opts[:value])

    if !function_exported?(opts[:value], :new, 1) do
      raise "Module #{opts[:value]} given for value must implement new/1, got #{inspect(opts[:value].__info__(:functions))}"
    end

    %{
      value: opts[:value],
      key_name: opts[:key_name] || :id
    }
  end

  def cast(v, params) when is_list(v) do
    {:ok, from_json_list(v, params)}
  end

  def load(db_value, _loader, params) when is_list(db_value) do
    {:ok, from_json_list(db_value, params)}
  end

  def dump(data, _dumper, _params) when is_map(data) do
    {:ok, Map.values(data)}
  end

  defp from_json_list(value, params) do
    value
    |> Enum.map(&params[:value].new(&1))
    |> Map.new(&{get_in(&1, [Access.key(params[:key_name])]), &1})
  end
end

This however turns out to not work recursively: If the Entity defines another field using EmbeddedMap , that nested field is stored as the Map which breaks upon deserialization. I suppose I need to properly use the dumper provided to properly dig into the nested data, but so far I haven’t figured out how that would need to be called or passed. Could anyone here give me a pointer? The documentation at Ecto.ParameterizedType — Ecto v3.14.0 eluded me.

MarcusRiemer

MarcusRiemer

I got this to work recursively, but I think I have a more precise question now: Is there some public Ecto API to dump a whole struct?

When writing testcases for nested datasets I figured out that Ecto probably uses something along the lines of Ecto.Type.dump(MyModule.__schema__(:type, :field))to dump individual fields. So I’m now doing the same when dumping map values. The new implementation looks like this:

  def dump(data, dumper, params) when is_map(data) do
    {:ok, Map.values(data) |> Enum.map(& dump_struct(&1, dumper, params))}
  end

  # Checks whether any of the fields on the given struct are an embedded
  # map themselves. If this is the case the field is dumped with the type
  # information attached to the schema.
  defp dump_struct(data, dumper, params) when is_struct(data, params.value) do
    keys = data |> Map.from_struct() |> Map.keys()
    Enum.reduce(keys, data, fn key, data ->
      case params.value.__schema__(:type, key) do
        {:parameterized, {EctoSupport.EmbeddedMap, _params}} = t ->
          {:ok, transformed} = dumper.(t, get_in(data, [Access.key!(key)]))
          put_in(data, [Access.key!(key)], transformed)
        _ ->
          data
      end
    end)
  end

This gives me recursion on my own types and has so far passed my synthetic and practical tests. But if feels weird as I …

  • enumerate over all fields instead of somehow specifically grabbing those with matching types …
  • needed to jump through the Access.key! hoops to do the manipulation on the struct on the fly …
  • and disregard every field that is not a EmbeddedMap.

So there is probably a nicer way to do this.

MarcusRiemer

MarcusRiemer

Additional warning for anyone following this route: If you miss the def embed_as(_), do: :dump that was given in the example, you are going to have a painful time debugging why your maps are “sometimes” stored directly as map instead of being converted to a list … In my case this only surfaced for types that are children of polymorphic_embeds_many or polymorphic_embeds_one.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
mcass19
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews