lessless
Hi,
I’m trying to set up client SSL validation with Google Cloud SQL, and things are not going well for multiple reasons.
First off, I was unable to get verify_peer mode working.
2022-08-02T18:42:38.029 app[7047257c] lhr [info] 18:42:38.028 [notice] TLS :client: In state :wait_cert at ssl_handshake.erl:2075 generated CLIENT ALERT: Fatal - Handshake Failure
2022-08-02T18:42:38.029 app[7047257c] lhr [info] - {:bad_cert, :hostname_check_failed}
I tried to add custom verify_fun: &:ssl_verify_hostname.verify_fun/3, through {:ssl_verify_fun, "~> 1.1"} but it falls over due to the bad arity:
2022-08-02T18:39:18.364 app[400cc581] lhr [info] 2022/08/02 18:39:18 listening on [fdaa:0:6924:a7b:276d:1:5d29:2]:22 (DNS: [fdaa::3]:53)
2022-08-02T18:39:20.347 app[400cc581] lhr [info] Reaped child process with pid: 567, exit code: 0
2022-08-02T18:39:23.215 app[400cc581] lhr [info] 18:39:23.214 [notice] TLS :client: In state :wait_cert at ssl_handshake.erl:362 generated CLIENT ALERT: Fatal - Internal Error
2022-08-02T18:39:23.215 app[400cc581] lhr [info] - {:unexpected_error,
2022-08-02T18:39:23.215 app[400cc581] lhr [info] {:badarity,
2022-08-02T18:39:23.215 app[400cc581] lhr [info] {&:ssl_verify_hostname.verify_fun/3, [[bad_cert: :hostname_check_failed]]}}}
2022-08-02T18:39:23.216 app[400cc581] lhr [info] 18:39:23.214 [notice] TLS :client: In state :wait_cert at ssl_handshake.erl:362 generated CLIENT ALERT: Fatal - Internal Error
so I ended up with verify: :verify_none, which works fine with OTP 24.
Next, upgrading to OTP 25 breaks things even further - with that, Ecto can’t find a client certificate.
2022-08-02T19:03:30.027 app[f5a13d3f] lhr [info] 19:03:30.027 [error] Postgrex.Protocol (#PID<0.1965.0>) failed to connect: ** (Postgrex.Error) FATAL 28000 (invalid_authorization_specification) connection requires a valid client certificate
My config:
config :my_app, MyApp.Repo,
ssl: true,
ssl_opts: [
verify: :verify_none,
cacertfile: "/.../server-ca.pem",
keyfile: "/.../client-key.pem",
certfile: "/.../client-cert.pem"
]
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Kia ora,
We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
Hello,
I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All Posts (oldest first)
- Show All Posts (newest first)
al2o3cr
In a similar security posture, post a credit card number here to get faster debugging help
The symptoms you’re describing make me wonder if Erlang has the right certs in its trust root.
lessless
I can drop a Monero wallet address if that counts
Hm, maybe you’re right
I’ve assumed that self-signed certificate should be handled by
cacertfileoption.dangdennis
I have the same issue attempting to run verification: verify_peer and cacert file with cockroachdb’s cacert. Have yet to determine actual solution. I suspect we share the same problem and are looking for the same solution.
voltone
There is some benefit to using TLS even with
verify: :verify_none: a passive attacker who can only monitor, but not modify, network traffic will not be able to decode the traffic exchanged with the server.Verification of the server certificate is necessary to protect against an active attacker. In a closed network environment like GCP some might argue that the risk of an active attacker is somewhat reduced, compared to connections that traverse the public internet.
If the server has a self-signed certificate, the certificate itself can’t be used to establish trust, in the same way that a CA-issued certificate can. But as long as the server continues to present the same certificate, or use the same key pair, you can ‘pin’ the certificate/public key and abort the connection if a different cert/key is used (which then requires manual verification to see if the change is legit or someone is trying to interfere).
The
ssl_verify_funpackage README has instructions on how to enable certificate or public key pinning. In Elixir that would look something like:(It doesn’t really matter here whether you pass
verify: :verify_noneorverify: :verify_peer- theverify_funoption overrides the default behaviors selected by that option anyway, but in recent OTP versions you’ll get a warning if you don’t set:verifyoption at all)(Also note that you probably wouldn’t want to use
reuse_sessions: falsein production, but it is necessary while testing otherwise a full handshake may not be performed and your changes to the connection options won’t take effect, leading to surprising results)dangdennis
Thank @voltone . I’ll try this. Great blog you got.
gesta
I’ve been able to fix this error, occurring when attempting to connect to a Google Cloud SQL instance by restricting the versions options in
ssl_optsto[:"tlsv1.2"].While debugging I noticed an initial handshake attempt over TLS v1.3, then downgrading to a handshake over TLS v1.2 and then an error being returned. After restricting to TLS v1.2 only, the initial handshake attempt is successful and a connection is established afterwards.
NB: Google Cloud SQL supports only TLS versions 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2.
lessless
Amazing, thanks for the shout out.
Are you using
verify: :verify_peerwith that?nhpip
Hitting the same problem with Amazon RDS. Will try your fix too.
gesta
Nope, I was able to make it work with
verify: :verify_none, and:keyfile,cacertfile,certfileproperly set.kip
Are you on an OTP version less than 25?
In my libs (using the advice from @voltone) I’m configuring TLS 1.2 and 1.3 on OTP 25 and only 1.2 on earlier OTP versions. That seems to have stabilised this particular issue (not just on GCP, also on Github actions)