dokuzbir

dokuzbir

I want fetch time datas without specify minutes . So with one query, can i fetch these two times time: ~T[21:30:00] and time: ~T[21:15:00] ?

Showing Posts 1 to 10

Ankhers

Ankhers

start_time = ~T[21:00:00]
end_time = ~T[22:00:00]
MyApp.Repo.all(from f in Foo, 
  where: f.time >= ^start_time and f.time < ^end_time)

You can use Time.add/3 to get from your start time to the end time.

dokuzbir

dokuzbir OP

Thanks. What do you think about effiency of that code? Or should i splite time column to two different column :hour and :minute ?

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

The efficiency of that query depends on your database, not on your code. If you are so concerned, add a DB index to the column holding the timestamps.

Never do premature optimization.

Ankhers

Ankhers

I’m not really sure how efficient it is. But I don’t really see it being bad. You could also try using a fragment to search.

MyApp.Repo.all(from f in Foo,
  where: fragment("extract(hour from ?)", f.time) == ^"21")

Keep in mind I haven’t tested the above, but it should work, or something close to it anyways. Take a look here for functions to process dates and times within postgres.

blatyo

blatyo

Conduit Core Team

I tend to favor @Ankhers first approach as opposed to extracting the hour out in the query. That’s simply because the database must now run that operation on every row. If you have an index on the time column, you won’t be able to use it, unless the index is for the specific operation you’re performing.

In short, favor doing the work once, rather than many times.

blatyo

blatyo

Conduit Core Team

I don’t think it will make much difference. The only benefit I see is that it may make the work you do before the query simpler.

dokuzbir

dokuzbir OP

So if i understand right, @Ankhers’ s first approach better for indexes?

blatyo

blatyo

Conduit Core Team

The second approach could work fine if you had an expression index for it. But it would have to be a separate index from an index directly on the time column. So, you could end up with two potentially.

All of this is completely dependent on the situation though. If you have some other column you also always query on, it may reduce the result set, such that either solution is perfectly fine. I tend to avoid most indexes until it’s obvious they’re necessary. Before, I would try to pre-empt what indexes would be useful and later find most of them are unused because another one gave better performance, so the query planner always picked it. Having unused indexes affects write performance without any gain. Just watch your slow query log and you’ll be able to see what needs optimizing.

dokuzbir

dokuzbir OP

I actually had date:string, hour:integer, minute:integer columns. I started refactor my app to date:date , time:time columns. After comments i decided one date_time:naive_datetime and index. I dont know how postgresql works behind scene. My story is fetching booking slots depends on court_id and date. New problem is only court_id index works well ? or both court_id and date indexes? What do you think about having 2 indexes in same table ?

blatyo

blatyo

Conduit Core Team

If you’re going to always query two columns you should use a compound index, not one for each field. In most circumstances, a database can only use one index at a time.

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews