hogne
Hi
I’m using traverse_errors as described here: Ecto.Changeset — Ecto v3.14.0 to gather validation errors from a schema with an embed_many.
I get the following output (truncated for readability):
%{
mods: [
%{},
%{value: ["is invalid"]},
%{},
%{},
%{value: ["is invalid"]},
%{value: ["is invalid"]},
%{value: [...]},
%{...},
...
]
}
I would like to include the actual values that trigger the invalid failures, but can’t see any obvious way of doing it. Neither the Changeset.changes nor Changeset.errors seem to contain this information?
Any tips would be appreciated, thanks
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
wojtekmach
changeset.paramscontains values that are being casted, I think you’d have to manually traverse changesets (like traverse_errors does it) to match up values with errors.al2o3cr
Sounds like you might get what you’re looking for with the behavior
traverse_errorshas when you pass a function with arity 3, referenced briefly in the documentation:Combining the first two args using
Ecto.Changeset.get_change(changeset, field)will get you the value that triggered the validation error.hogne
Hi
Thanks for the replies.
I have been testing with passing a function with arity 3 now and that gives me access to the entire changeset. get_change was convenient, but it seems if the error is a cast error then Changeset.changes doesn’t include the key:value pair that failed at all. If the error was an inclusion error it is included.