9Dave9
Hello,
I have a query, where I’d like to grab all records still in the future.
def get_scheduled_notification_pushes_from_date(date\\DateTime.utc_now()) do
query = from s in ScheduledPush,
where: s.status not in ["completed", "cancelled"] and s.utc_schedule_time >= ^date
Repo.all(query)
end
I thought that this would possibly get converted or cast for postgres - but it must be doing something weird.
I also tried comparing ~U[] objects.. but that’s a bad idea…
iex(37)> ~U[2020-08-15 20:39:00.000000Z] >= ~U[2020-08-15 20:36:10.367654Z]
warning: invalid comparison with struct literal ~U"2020-08-15 20:39:00.000000Z". Comparison operators (>, <, >=, <=) perform structural and not semantic comparison. Comparing with a struct literal is unlikely to give a meaningful result. Modules typically define a compare/2 function that can be used for semantic comparison
false
How do I look for records based on a value that is ahead of DateTime.utc_now() with Ecto?
The type for utc_schedule_time is utc_datetime_usec
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
Hey guys,
I’ve got a huge CSV ( around 10 GB ) that needs to be processed hourly
Do you guys have any suggestions what is the best prac...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I have what I’ve heard referred to as a “lookup table” in my database. This is a way of assigning codes to common values. One common lo...
New
Hello,
I’m developing a online persistent chat system (what’s app) like using elixir/dynamodb/aws for a mobile app(flutter).
The diffic...
New
What approach to take when sending live updates to “random” users Hi! I have a question, I have a little chat app, and when I create a DM...
New
I think I’ve found a small improvement I could contribute to <%= web_namespace %>.CoreComponents (installer/templates/phx_web/compo...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
There are three potential reasons for members of this forum to have a look at https://vutuv.de
You are tired or annoyed of LinkedIn.
Yo...
New
ICal is a library for interacting with iCalendar data. It parses iCalendars into typed Elixir structs via ICal.from_ics, and can prepare ...
New
Latest Phoenix Threads
Latest on Elixir Forum
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #elixirconf-us
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
This looks like it should work - how does it fail?
The behavior of
>=on~Uis a standard gotcha ->=compares things in Erlang term order, which compares structs field-by-field, alphabetically. Since this is not what you likely want, the compiler emits a warning.9Dave9
Hi,
Yeh so I just realised they’re seen as maps and the keys are what are being compared apparently.|
I swapped the above out with this:
From the docs here
Still get no results and there are results in the DB to pull.
al2o3cr
That other query also looks like it should work.
Does anything unusual show up when you convert it to SQL with
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.to_sql?Double-check that the data that comes back when you do
Repo.all(ScheduledPush)matches what you expect; maybe there’s a errant UTC conversion offsetting things?9Dave9
The schema type for that field is
:utc_datetime_usec.SQL:
[{"SELECT s0.\"id\", s0.\"body\", s0.\"channel_id\", s0.\"timezone\", s0.\"title\", s0.\"user_ids\", s0.\"utc_schedule_time\", s0.\"local_schedule_time\", s0.\"utc_send_time\", s0.\"status\", s0.\"confirmed_send_count\", s0.\"inserted_at\", s0.\"updated_at\" FROM \"scheduled_notification_pushes\" AS s0 WHERE (NOT (s0.\"status\" IN ('completed','cancelled')) AND (s0.\"utc_schedule_time\" < $1::timestamp + interval '1 microsecond'))", [~U[2020-08-16 01:26:47.451151Z]]}I think it’s because it’s still trying to compare with a ~U object.
If I run the plain SQL I get the correct results it seems but this returns my results in a random List format which is insanely difficult to map and work with.
i.e
9Dave9
=======================UPDATE =====================
This works:
This doesn’t
This also doesn’t work
Looks like adding in an
andwith more conditions change the datetime part of the query somehow.I can’t see anything obvious still though.
9Dave9
======================= SOLUTION - PROBLEM SOLVED =====================
The original query I thought was giving me problems was:
Not realizing that Ecto would cast the date types appropriately to play nicely with postgres/SQL I went the terminal and did the
~U[some date] < ~U[some date]- silly and I got the gotcha notification to remind me.I thought this is what was probably happening in the query and I need to cast those values manually.
Turns out if you have
nullvalues in a column and you try and string match - some how this does something weird where it doesn’t evaluate the record maybe? I don’t know.. all I know is that the moment I do try and string match on a field which wasnullto begin with this row is no longer considered even if all the conditions pass.I migrated all the values to “pending” to check this.. and
Voila:
My final though was maybe this might be a
validate_requiredfield in the schema and hence the result from the query being removed - nope, it’s not a require field either.al2o3cr
The problem is the NULL -
NULL IN ('completed', 'canceled')doesn’t evaluate tofalseit evaluates toNULL, andNOT(NULL)is stillNULL.9Dave9
Ah yes, I see. Thanks for the help!