9Dave9
Hello,
I have a query, where I’d like to grab all records still in the future.
def get_scheduled_notification_pushes_from_date(date\\DateTime.utc_now()) do
query = from s in ScheduledPush,
where: s.status not in ["completed", "cancelled"] and s.utc_schedule_time >= ^date
Repo.all(query)
end
I thought that this would possibly get converted or cast for postgres - but it must be doing something weird.
I also tried comparing ~U[] objects.. but that’s a bad idea…
iex(37)> ~U[2020-08-15 20:39:00.000000Z] >= ~U[2020-08-15 20:36:10.367654Z]
warning: invalid comparison with struct literal ~U"2020-08-15 20:39:00.000000Z". Comparison operators (>, <, >=, <=) perform structural and not semantic comparison. Comparing with a struct literal is unlikely to give a meaningful result. Modules typically define a compare/2 function that can be used for semantic comparison
false
How do I look for records based on a value that is ahead of DateTime.utc_now() with Ecto?
The type for utc_schedule_time is utc_datetime_usec
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security











Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
This looks like it should work - how does it fail?
The behavior of
>=on~Uis a standard gotcha ->=compares things in Erlang term order, which compares structs field-by-field, alphabetically. Since this is not what you likely want, the compiler emits a warning.9Dave9
Hi,
Yeh so I just realised they’re seen as maps and the keys are what are being compared apparently.|
I swapped the above out with this:
From the docs here
Still get no results and there are results in the DB to pull.
al2o3cr
That other query also looks like it should work.
Does anything unusual show up when you convert it to SQL with
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.to_sql?Double-check that the data that comes back when you do
Repo.all(ScheduledPush)matches what you expect; maybe there’s a errant UTC conversion offsetting things?9Dave9
The schema type for that field is
:utc_datetime_usec.SQL:
[{"SELECT s0.\"id\", s0.\"body\", s0.\"channel_id\", s0.\"timezone\", s0.\"title\", s0.\"user_ids\", s0.\"utc_schedule_time\", s0.\"local_schedule_time\", s0.\"utc_send_time\", s0.\"status\", s0.\"confirmed_send_count\", s0.\"inserted_at\", s0.\"updated_at\" FROM \"scheduled_notification_pushes\" AS s0 WHERE (NOT (s0.\"status\" IN ('completed','cancelled')) AND (s0.\"utc_schedule_time\" < $1::timestamp + interval '1 microsecond'))", [~U[2020-08-16 01:26:47.451151Z]]}I think it’s because it’s still trying to compare with a ~U object.
If I run the plain SQL I get the correct results it seems but this returns my results in a random List format which is insanely difficult to map and work with.
i.e
9Dave9
=======================UPDATE =====================
This works:
This doesn’t
This also doesn’t work
Looks like adding in an
andwith more conditions change the datetime part of the query somehow.I can’t see anything obvious still though.
9Dave9
======================= SOLUTION - PROBLEM SOLVED =====================
The original query I thought was giving me problems was:
Not realizing that Ecto would cast the date types appropriately to play nicely with postgres/SQL I went the terminal and did the
~U[some date] < ~U[some date]- silly and I got the gotcha notification to remind me.I thought this is what was probably happening in the query and I need to cast those values manually.
Turns out if you have
nullvalues in a column and you try and string match - some how this does something weird where it doesn’t evaluate the record maybe? I don’t know.. all I know is that the moment I do try and string match on a field which wasnullto begin with this row is no longer considered even if all the conditions pass.I migrated all the values to “pending” to check this.. and
Voila:
My final though was maybe this might be a
validate_requiredfield in the schema and hence the result from the query being removed - nope, it’s not a require field either.al2o3cr
The problem is the NULL -
NULL IN ('completed', 'canceled')doesn’t evaluate tofalseit evaluates toNULL, andNOT(NULL)is stillNULL.9Dave9
Ah yes, I see. Thanks for the help!