9Dave9

9Dave9

Hello,

I have a query, where I’d like to grab all records still in the future.

  def get_scheduled_notification_pushes_from_date(date\\DateTime.utc_now()) do                                                                         
    query = from s in ScheduledPush,                                                                                                                   
      where: s.status not in ["completed", "cancelled"] and s.utc_schedule_time >= ^date                                                               
                                                                                                                                                       
    Repo.all(query)                                                                                                                                    
  end    

I thought that this would possibly get converted or cast for postgres - but it must be doing something weird.

I also tried comparing ~U[] objects.. but that’s a bad idea…

iex(37)> ~U[2020-08-15 20:39:00.000000Z] >= ~U[2020-08-15 20:36:10.367654Z]

warning: invalid comparison with struct literal ~U"2020-08-15 20:39:00.000000Z". Comparison operators (>, <, >=, <=) perform structural and not semantic comparison. Comparing with a struct literal is unlikely to give a meaningful result. Modules typically define a compare/2 function that can be used for semantic comparison

false

How do I look for records based on a value that is ahead of DateTime.utc_now() with Ecto?

The type for utc_schedule_time is utc_datetime_usec

Showing Posts 1 to 8

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

This looks like it should work - how does it fail?

The behavior of >= on ~U is a standard gotcha - >= compares things in Erlang term order, which compares structs field-by-field, alphabetically. Since this is not what you likely want, the compiler emits a warning.

9Dave9

9Dave9 OP

Hi,

Yeh so I just realised they’re seen as maps and the keys are what are being compared apparently.|

I swapped the above out with this:

 query = from s in ScheduledPush, where: s.status not in ["completed", "cancelled"] and s.utc_schedule_time > from_now(1, "microsecond") 

From the docs here

Still get no results and there are results in the DB to pull.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

That other query also looks like it should work. :thinking: Does anything unusual show up when you convert it to SQL with Ecto.Adapters.SQL.to_sql?

Double-check that the data that comes back when you do Repo.all(ScheduledPush) matches what you expect; maybe there’s a errant UTC conversion offsetting things?

9Dave9

9Dave9 OP

The schema type for that field is :utc_datetime_usec.

SQL: [{"SELECT s0.\"id\", s0.\"body\", s0.\"channel_id\", s0.\"timezone\", s0.\"title\", s0.\"user_ids\", s0.\"utc_schedule_time\", s0.\"local_schedule_time\", s0.\"utc_send_time\", s0.\"status\", s0.\"confirmed_send_count\", s0.\"inserted_at\", s0.\"updated_at\" FROM \"scheduled_notification_pushes\" AS s0 WHERE (NOT (s0.\"status\" IN ('completed','cancelled')) AND (s0.\"utc_schedule_time\" < $1::timestamp + interval '1 microsecond'))", [~U[2020-08-16 01:26:47.451151Z]]}

I think it’s because it’s still trying to compare with a ~U object.

If I run the plain SQL I get the correct results it seems but this returns my results in a random List format which is insanely difficult to map and work with.

i.e

# This returns the right results it seems, bu the format sucks

date = DateTime.utc_now()

    Repo |> Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query!(                                                                                                                      
     "select * from scheduled_notification_pushes where utc_schedule_time > $1;", [date]                                                                   
    ) 
9Dave9

9Dave9 OP

=======================UPDATE =====================

This works:

query = from s in ScheduledPush, where: s.utc_schedule_time > datetime_add(^date, 1, "microsecond")

This doesn’t

query = from s in ScheduledPush, where: s.utc_schedule_time > datetime_add(^date, 1, "microsecond") and s.status not in ["completed", "cancelled"]

This also doesn’t work

query = from s in ScheduledPush, where: s.utc_schedule_time > datetime_add(^date, 1, "microsecond")
 and s.status != "completed" and s.status != "cancelled"

Looks like adding in an and with more conditions change the datetime part of the query somehow.

I can’t see anything obvious still though.

9Dave9

9Dave9 OP

======================= SOLUTION - PROBLEM SOLVED =====================

The original query I thought was giving me problems was:

query = from s in ScheduledPush,                                                                                                                       
      where: s.utc_schedule_time > ^date and s.status not in ["completed", "cancelled"]

Not realizing that Ecto would cast the date types appropriately to play nicely with postgres/SQL I went the terminal and did the ~U[some date] < ~U[some date] - silly and I got the gotcha notification to remind me.

I thought this is what was probably happening in the query and I need to cast those values manually.

Turns out if you have null values in a column and you try and string match - some how this does something weird where it doesn’t evaluate the record maybe? I don’t know.. all I know is that the moment I do try and string match on a field which was null to begin with this row is no longer considered even if all the conditions pass.

I migrated all the values to “pending” to check this.. and

Voila:

[debug] QUERY OK source="scheduled_notification_pushes" db=1.1ms queue=0.8ms idle=9384.5ms
SELECT s0."id", s0."body", s0."channel_id", s0."timezone", s0."title", s0."user_ids", s0."utc_schedule_time", s0."local_schedule_time", s0."utc_send_time", s0."status", s0."confirmed_send_count", s0."inserted_at", s0."updated_at" FROM "scheduled_notification_pushes" AS s0 WHERE ((s0."utc_schedule_time" > $1) AND NOT (s0."status" IN ('completed','cancelled'))) [~U[2020-08-16 02:01:56Z]]

["2020-08-19 16:05:00Z pending", "2020-08-19 17:05:00Z pending",
 "2020-08-19 21:05:00Z pending", "2020-08-19 15:05:00Z pending",
 "2020-08-16 02:09:00Z pending", "2020-08-16 04:33:00Z pending",
 "2020-08-16 05:41:00Z pending", "2020-08-19 01:41:00Z pending",
 "2020-08-19 05:41:00Z pending", "2020-08-18 23:41:00Z pending",
 "2020-08-19 00:41:00Z pending"]

My final though was maybe this might be a validate_required field in the schema and hence the result from the query being removed - nope, it’s not a require field either.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

WHERE (NOT (s0.status IN ('completed','cancelled'))

The problem is the NULL - NULL IN ('completed', 'canceled') doesn’t evaluate to false it evaluates to NULL, and NOT(NULL) is still NULL.

9Dave9

9Dave9 OP

Ah yes, I see. Thanks for the help!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
pragdave
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates? {Textile.render(@product.long_description)} escapes the HTM...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
rlipscombe
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New
saleyn
Is there a way to import record definitions in the iex shell for pretty printing (similar to the rr command in the erl shell)? This woul...
New
rlipscombe
When I use Mix.install with a git dependency, using git@github.com:... how do I change the SSH identity used? I’ve got two Github accoun...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews