henry-iteron

henry-iteron

In Elixir, I have to use the list of integers and work with that,

If my input is [55] it gives the data as ‘7’ but I need it to be [55] only. How can I maintain it?

If I try this as [‘55’], it’s working fine. But I want to work with [55] which is a list of integers.

Is there any solution available?

Showing Posts 1 to 4

bartblast

bartblast

Creator of Hologram

Hey @henry-iteron, welcome to the community :slight_smile:
I assume you’re using IO.inspect/2? To get what you want you need the :charlists opt, e.g.

IO.inspect([55], charlists: :as_lists)

Take a look here: Inspect.Opts — Elixir v1.20.2

tj0

tj0

It’s not converting, it’s just a display issue.

A charlist is a list of integers. 55 is the decimal code for ascii “7”.

iex> IO.inspect([55], [charlists: :as_lists])

To see all the options:

iex> h Inspect.Opts 
sbuttgereit

sbuttgereit

The other two replies are exactly correct and I’m not going to add any new facts. All I’m going to try to do is simplify those comments a bit.

This is the root of the problem: a charlist can be thought of as special sort of string and it’s just a list of integers… which is indistinguishable from any other list of integers where you really want just the numbers. Because Elixir can’t always tell the difference between a list of integers which is just a list of integers and a list of integers which is meant to be a charlist is makes a default choice when it comes to displaying the list: treat the integers as ASCII values and print those characters. In your case it’s wrong, but as the others said, its just a display issue: your list of integers is there as you intended and will work the way you intend outside of this output behavior. Importantly, note that the actual list and its values are not transformed from what you expect: this is just the way your values are interpreted for display.

This is the way to change the default output of that list. In your case, (assuming you’re using IO.inspect/2), the default assumption that a list of valid ASCII codes is ASCII is wrong and the option described above changes that default assumption for that run of the function. This doesn’t change the actual list values, that’s always the [55] you intended, just the way they are displayed.

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Welcome to the community! You have completed your first rite of passage by asking this question :smiley: It’s all downhill from here!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews