vivus-ignis

vivus-ignis

Emulate File.stream! for a string variable

Hello there!

I have a mix task which grabs some data from a remote API, collects it into a file (a biggish xml), then sucks it in as a stream and processes doing a bunch of text transformations.
Now I’m trying to sketch an integration test for the processing part (skipping the getting-the-data part) and I wonder… is it possible to use a string variable instead of a file for that purpose?

This is what I have in my mix task code:

    File.stream!("#{@download_dir}/#{category}.xml", [:read])
    |> ... processing part I want to test follows

And this is how I’m trying to simulate (unsuccessfully so far) the File.stream! part:

    input_xml = """
     ... xml fragment ...
    ...
    """
    input_xml
    |> Stream.unfold( &(String.split(&1, "~n")) )
    |> ... processing part ...

Of course what I’m getting after this Stream.unfold is different from File.stream! – the Stream.unfold results in all the newlines being removed.
And then my processing part breaks as it relies on newlines in certain places (yeah, it sounds crazy, but inside that xml I have wiki markup-formatted fragments where newlines do matter).

So my question is: is it possible to split a string by newlines in such a way that I can preserve those "\n"s? That is, can I emulate FIle.stream! without an actual file?

Would appreciate any hints. Thank you!

Marked As Solved

wmnnd

wmnnd

You’re in luck, you can simply use StringIO.open/1 and IO.binstream in order to stream any String:

{:ok, stream} =
  "abc\ndef\nghi\n"
  |> StringIO.open()

stream
|> IO.binstream(:line)
|> #your own stream processing

Also Liked

ku1ik

ku1ik

Alternative solution to using StringIO + IO.binstream would be to use Stream.unfold with binary pattern matching:

  def binary_stream(b, chunk_size \\ 50_000) when is_binary(b) do
    Stream.unfold(0, fn skip ->
      case b do
        <<_skipped::binary-size(skip), chunk::binary-size(chunk_size), _rest::binary>> ->
          {chunk, skip + chunk_size}

        <<_skipped::binary-size(skip)>> ->
          nil

        <<_skipped::binary-size(skip), chunk::binary>> ->
          {chunk, skip + byte_size(chunk)}
      end
    end)
  end

I tested this on pretty big XML docs (hundreds of megabytes) and it seems to be performant and doesn’t require much memory due to not copying/cloning any part of the binary data.

PS: for this particular case (XML parsing), it’s not necessary to read by line, and in fact some XML documents (or SOAP API responses) return whole XML doc as a single long line without line breaks.

michalmuskala

michalmuskala

Why not use one of the string functions? I understand you want to get an enumerable of lines from the string. This can be achieved eagerly with String.split(str, "\n") or lazily with String.splitter(str, "\n").

NobbZ

NobbZ

Because String.split/2 and String.splitter/2 will remove the split-points, but the OP said he needs them intact.

Last Post!

antoine

antoine

Thanks for this post, it was very usefull !

But I think the post marked as solution is not the more appropriate.
The solution using String.splitter(str, "\n") seems to behave more as expected.

Explanations:
When using this:

str = "abc\ndef\nghi\n"

{:ok, stream} = str |> StringIO.open()

s = stream |> IO.binstream(:line)

it do not work as expected:

iex> s |> Enum.take(1)
["abc\n"]
iex> s |> Enum.take(1)
["def\n"]

=> The result should always be the same as it’s the same operation.

Like we have here:

iex> s = File.stream!("/tmp/foo.csv")
iex> s |> Enum.take(1)
["hey\n"]
iex> s |> Enum.take(1)
["hey\n"]

Instead, String.splitter(str, "\n"), do the job as expected:

iex> str = "abc\ndef\nghi\n"
iex> s = String.splitter(str, "\n")

iex> s |> Enum.take(1)
["abc"]
iex> s |> Enum.take(1)
["abc"]

Where Next?

Popular in Questions Top

jononomo
I am trying to figure out how Mix knows whether the environment is test, dev, or prod – where is this set? Thanks.
New
hariharasudhan94
Lets say I have map like this fetching from my database %{"_id" =&gt; #BSON.ObjectId&lt;58eb1a7a9ad169198c3dXXXX&gt;, "email" =&gt; ...
New
hariharasudhan94
I would like to know what is the best IDE for elixir development?
New
Brian
What is the proper way to load a module from a file in to IEX? In the python world, doing something like this pretty standard: from ....
New
joeerl
Hello again - after a longish gap I’ve decided I really must dig into Elixir and see what’s been happening here - so I have a few questio...
New
aalberti333
As the title describes, I’m trying to run Enum.map() over a list of key/value pairs, where the value is a map. My data looks like this: ...
New
alice
Hey, Just curious what are the main benefits of Elixir compared to Clojure? When is Elixir more useful than Clojure and vice versa? Th...
New

Other popular topics Top

baxterw3b
Hi guys, i’m new in the Elixir world, and i have to say, that i love it! i’m having some problem to understand anonymous functions with ...
New
Qqwy
Original source of discussion: This topic on the Pragmatic Programmers’ Functional Web Development with Elixir, OTP, and Phoenix forum. ...
New
JakeBecker
TL;DR: I’ve just released an implementation of Microsoft’s IDE-independent Language Server Protocol for Elixir. It adds language support ...
1144 54996 245
New
jononomo
For some reason my phoenix channels are working for me in my local dev environment, but as soon as I deploy via Docker, I get a 403 error...
New
WestKeys
Currently suffering from paralysis by [HTTP client] analysis. This is rather unusual in Elixirland as there tends to be consensus on the ...
New
AstonJ
Posting this to see if we can make things easier for people to get into Neovim. If you use Neovim and have a favourite distro please let ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement