pablito
Hi, we’re using libcluster + horde to manage process balancing of some genservers. So, we want to get the security right and have an encrypted communication between processes.
I guess that horde messages aren’t so important because they are mostly metadata, but the genservers themselves are communicating between each other and there is some sensitive information in those messages. Is there any library to send those messages encrypted or simply encrypt message before send and decrypt after receive?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
kokolegorille
Hello and welcome, You might be interested by…
shanesveller
You can view this guide to see the facilities for making Distributed Erlang itself use SSL for all communications between nodes:
Just as a doom-and-gloom aside, Distributed Erlang as a paradigm/protocol doesn’t have any notion of meaningful security, privacy, or other boundaries between cluster peers. If you have any concerns that another BEAM node has been successfully compromised by a malicious party, reading inter-process messages is far down the list of possible harm they could do. They could use RPC to delete files, manipulate database rows, plus ~anything the OS user has permission to do. Erlang cookie is also not a terribly useful security mechanism and should be combined with suitable network rules when possible.
D4no0
I agree with @shanesveller, if you are exposing the nodes to internet you are doing it wrong.
I think the best solution for this kind of problem lies at network level, if you are using the same cloud provider you can use internal IPs to communicate between nodes or use a VPN if you really need to go over public network.
pablito
We’re not exposing the nodes to the internet. This will run on k8s, so the communication is internal, we’re just exploring this to add an extra level of security. As said by @shanesveller, if a malicious actor has total control of a node, the messages are the least worrying thing. I’m thinking the possibility of another pod compromised on the network that can somehow read these unencrypted messages.