Maxximiliann

Maxximiliann

Given:

market_data = 
[
  %{
    asset: "3QvxP6YFBKpWJSMAfYtL8Niv8KmmKsnpb9uQwQpg8QN2",
    last_price: 0.1249534,
    priced_in: "WAVES",
    volume: 13793.6013752778
  },
  %{
    asset: "3QvxP6YFBKpWJSMAfYtL8Niv8KmmKsnpb9uQwQpg8QN2",
    last_price: 1.626e-5,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 10311.7855749146
  },
  %{
    asset: "474jTeYx2r2Va35794tCScAXWJG9hU2HcgxzMowaZUnu",
    last_price: 189.658785,
    priced_in: "DG2xFkPdDwKUoBkzGAhQtLpSGzfXLiCYPEzeKH2Ad24p",
    volume: 52373.8805236538
  },
  %{
    asset: "474jTeYx2r2Va35794tCScAXWJG9hU2HcgxzMowaZUnu",
    last_price: 186.06, 
    priced_in: "WAVES",
    volume: 24023.1442492862
  },
  %{
    asset: "474jTeYx2r2Va35794tCScAXWJG9hU2HcgxzMowaZUnu",
    last_price: 0.02497085,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 8690.02335386836
  },
  %{
    asset: "4LHHvYGNKJUg5hj65aGD5vgScvCBmLpdRFtjokvCjSL8",
    last_price: 0.08150997,
    priced_in: "WAVES",
    volume: 40979.8114711376
  },
  %{
    asset: "4LHHvYGNKJUg5hj65aGD5vgScvCBmLpdRFtjokvCjSL8",
    last_price: 1.097e-5,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 252.945468613465
  },
  %{
    asset: "4LHHvYGNKJUg5hj65aGD5vgScvCBmLpdRFtjokvCjSL8",
    last_price: 0.08329,
    priced_in: "DG2xFkPdDwKUoBkzGAhQtLpSGzfXLiCYPEzeKH2Ad24p",
    volume: 201.247929171753
  },
  %{
    asset: "5WvPKSJXzVE2orvbkJ8wsQmmQKqTv9sGBPksV4adViw3",
    last_price: 0.00808268,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 3248.6225669422
  },
  %{
    asset: "5WvPKSJXzVE2orvbkJ8wsQmmQKqTv9sGBPksV4adViw3",
    last_price: 60.20503371,
    priced_in: "WAVES",
    volume: 516.180493091221
  },
  %{
    asset: "7Z5peMVTuyEesJcYn7B6DDtV8oqKAFueBA52vPuf59rh",
    last_price: 0.91104345,
    priced_in: "WAVES", 
    volume: 26300.1502283905
  },
  %{
    asset: "7Z5peMVTuyEesJcYn7B6DDtV8oqKAFueBA52vPuf59rh",
    last_price: 1.2554e-4,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 577.404317777729
  },
  %{
    asset: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    last_price: 7532.54,
    priced_in: "DG2xFkPdDwKUoBkzGAhQtLpSGzfXLiCYPEzeKH2Ad24p",
    volume: 163617.091159899
  },
  %{
    asset: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    last_price: 8250,
    priced_in: "34N9YcEETLWn93qYQ64EsP1x89tSruJU44RrEMSXXEPJ",
    volume: 1489.58529413729
  },
  %{
    asset: "Bwn3tDxj1rqqFGsnEy7Z829aj8Gs2UVQA7yktaJ6auHN",
    last_price: 7.1e-7,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 1259.50422417225
  },
  %{
    asset: "Bwn3tDxj1rqqFGsnEy7Z829aj8Gs2UVQA7yktaJ6auHN",
    last_price: 0.00430558,
    priced_in: "WAVES",
    volume: 290.292294688471
  },
  %{
    asset: "DHgwrRvVyqJsepd32YbBqUeDH4GJ1N984X8QoekjgH8J",
    last_price: 300000000005,
    priced_in: "7b4tRbsy8zNDW35gW9DETdRU5yaNoFGm2SvmwRuCns3f",
    volume: 447641.500005591
  },
  %{
    asset: "DHgwrRvVyqJsepd32YbBqUeDH4GJ1N984X8QoekjgH8J",
    last_price: 0.05229596,
    priced_in: "WAVES",
    volume: 14287.8709376739
  },
  %{
    asset: "DHgwrRvVyqJsepd32YbBqUeDH4GJ1N984X8QoekjgH8J",
    last_price: 0.05294568,
    priced_in: "DG2xFkPdDwKUoBkzGAhQtLpSGzfXLiCYPEzeKH2Ad24p",
    volume: 13348.2393706553
  },
  %{
    asset: "DHgwrRvVyqJsepd32YbBqUeDH4GJ1N984X8QoekjgH8J",
    last_price: 7.94e-6,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 10824.4211299108
  },
  %{
    asset: "EYz8Zvs62D4d7F5ZgXHCWuzuFaZg63FYnfVQrTWQoLSK",
    last_price: 7.9e-5,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 1666.02995108187
  },
  %{
    asset: "EYz8Zvs62D4d7F5ZgXHCWuzuFaZg63FYnfVQrTWQoLSK",
    last_price: 0.57,
    priced_in: "WAVES",
    volume: 1582.6257
  },
  %{
    asset: "HZk1mbfuJpmxU1Fs4AX5MWLVYtctsNcg6e2C6VKqK8zk",
    last_price: 0.00594059,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 4020.64881215575
  },
  %{
    asset: "HZk1mbfuJpmxU1Fs4AX5MWLVYtctsNcg6e2C6VKqK8zk",
    last_price: 43.9669216,
    priced_in: "WAVES",
    volume: 2384.30279291976
  },
  %{
    asset: "WAVES",
    last_price: 1.010899,
    priced_in: "DG2xFkPdDwKUoBkzGAhQtLpSGzfXLiCYPEzeKH2Ad24p",
    volume: 383661.118208469
  },
  %{
    asset: "WAVES",
    last_price: 1.3345e-4,
    priced_in: "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS",
    volume: 51539.1607843401
  },
  %{
    asset: "WAVES",
    last_price: 1.0467, 
    priced_in: "34N9YcEETLWn93qYQ64EsP1x89tSruJU44RrEMSXXEPJ",
    volume: 705.83415129
  }
]

Code:

def conversions do
		market_data
		|> Enum.map(fn map -> if Enum.member?(map.priced_in, "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS") do
				%{
					asset: map.asset,
					btc_price: map.last_price
				}
			else
				%{
					asset: map.asset,
					price: map.last_price,
					priced_in: map.priced_in,
					asset_to_btc_rate: asset_to_btc_rate(map.priced_in),
					btc_price: map.last_price * asset_to_btc_rate(map.priced_in)
				}
			end
		end) 
end
Error: ** (Protocol.UndefinedError) protocol Enumerable not implemented for "WAVES" of type BitString. This protocol is implemented for the following type(s): Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Stream, Postgrex.Stream, DBConnection.PrepareStream, DBConnection.Stream, HashSet, Map, Function, List, File.Stream, Date.Range, Range, HashDict, MapSet, Stream, IO.Stream, GenEvent.Stream

What’s going on here and how do I resolve this issue? Thanks for your patient help! :slight_smile:

Showing Posts 1 to 6

Marcus

Marcus

Hello,

you are mapping over a list of maps. Therefore you get a map and map.prieced_in is a binary and this you give to Enum.member?, but Enum.member? needs an enumerable not a binary. The first data, in this case, is "WAVES" and for this protocol Enumerable not implemented ...

Maxximiliann

Maxximiliann OP

Thank you for clarifying :slight_smile:
Here’s a workaround I’ve attempted:


market_data
		|> Enum.map(fn(map.priced_in) -> 
			case map.priced_in do
				map.priced_in != "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS" ->
					%{
						asset: map.asset,
						price: map.last_price,
						priced_in: map.priced_in,
						asset_to_btc_rate: asset_to_btc_rate(map.priced_in),
						btc_price: map.last_price * asset_to_btc_rate(map.priced_in)
					}
					map.priced_in == "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS" ->
						%{
							asset: map.asset,
							btc_price: map.last_price
						}
						_ ->
							%{
								asset: map.asset,
								price: map.last_price,
								priced_in: map.priced_in,
								status: "NIL ERROR"
							}
						end
					end) 
iex(2)> recompile
Compiling 1 file (.ex)

** (CompileError) : cannot invoke remote function map.priced_in/0 inside a match

How can I make this work? Thanks again! :slight_smile:

andreolvr

andreolvr

The compile error is happening because this is not the correct syntax for case, take a look at https://elixir-lang.org/getting-started/case-cond-and-if.html. Another problem in this logic is that the third clause (_) will never be reached, the value is equals 8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS or not. There is no third option. Maybe you are looking for an if/else instead of a case?

Maxximiliann

Maxximiliann OP

Thanks for your input. :slight_smile:

def conversions do
	market_data
	|> Enum.map(fn map -> if map.priced_in != "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS" do
		%{
			asset: map.asset,
			price: map.last_price,
			priced_in: map.priced_in,
			asset_to_btc_rate: asset_to_btc_rate(map.priced_in),
			btc_price: map.last_price * asset_to_btc_rate(map.priced_in)
		}
	else
		%{
			asset: map.asset,
			btc_price: map.last_price
		}
	end
end) 

Yields:

** (Protocol.UndefinedError) protocol Enumerable not implemented for nil of type Atom. This protocol is implemented for the following type(s): Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Stream, Postgrex.Stream, DBConnection.PrepareStream, DBConnection.Stream, HashSet, Map, Function, List, File.Stream, Date.Range, Range, HashDict, MapSet, Stream, IO.Stream, GenEvent.Stream

How do I address this nilcase without a case statement?

Marcus

Marcus

Maybe, you needs …

def conversions(nil), do: nil
def conversions(market_data) do
	Enum.map(market_data, fn map -> 
		if map.priced_in != "8LQW8f7P5d5PZM7GtZEBgaqRPGSzS3DfPuiXrURJ4AJS" do
			%{
				asset: map.asset,
				price: map.last_price,
				priced_in: map.priced_in,
				asset_to_btc_rate: asset_to_btc_rate(map.priced_in),
				btc_price: map.last_price * asset_to_btc_rate(map.priced_in)
			}
		else
			%{
				asset: map.asset,
				btc_price: map.last_price
			}
		end
	end)
end
Maxximiliann

Maxximiliann OP

That helped. Thank you so very much! :slight_smile:

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews