ndrean

ndrean

I want to query an ETS table based on a condition. As per Erlang’s doc, I should be able to use variables in scope.
Is it possible to formulate the query below with this “imported variable” in Elixir ?

def get(id) do
  fun = :ets.fun2ms(fn {x,y,z,:_} when x == id or y == id -> {x,y,z} end)
  :ets.select(:table, fun)
end

This does not work with a variable, but works with a value.

(FunctionClauseError) no function clause matching in :ms_transform.normalise/1

You can obtain the result as below but not satisfied

def get(id), do:
[
    :ets.match_object(:table, {:"$1", id, :"$2", :_})
      | :ets.match_object(:table, {:"$1", :"$2", id, :_})
]
|> List.flatten()

Showing Posts 1 to 4

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

I’m not sure why exactly, but :ets.fun2ms doesn’t work in elixir (or at least not in all contexts). There’s :ex2ms to solve this:

import Ex2ms

fun do {x,y,z,_} when x == 1 or y == 1 -> {x,y,z} end
# [
#   {{:"$1", :"$2", :"$3", :_}, [{:orelse, {:==, :"$1", 1}, {:==, :"$2", 1}}],
#    [{{:"$1", :"$2", :"$3"}}]}
# ]

Replace 1 with id.

ndrean

ndrean OP

Yes this produces the “desired” :slight_smile: pattern. Thks

q = [{
  {:"$1", :"$2", :"$3", :_},
  [{:orelse, {:==, :"$2", {:const, id}}, {:==, :"$3", {:const, id}}}],
  [{{:"$1", :"$2", :"$3"}}]
}]

with:

q =
   Ex2ms.fun do
        {ch, e, r, _} when e == ^id or r == ^id -> {ch, e, r}
   end
al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Hmmm, the full stack trace is interesting:

iex(7)> :ets.fun2ms(fn {x,y,z,:_} when x == id or y == id -> {x,y,z} end)   
** (FunctionClauseError) no function clause matching in :ms_transform.normalise/1    
    
    The following arguments were given to :ms_transform.normalise/1:
    
        # 1
        {:EXIT,
         {:badarg,
          [
            {:lists, :keysearch, [:_@0, 1, %{_@0: 4}],
             [error_info: %{module: :erl_stdlib_errors}]},
            {:ms_transform, :fixup_environment, 2,
             [file: 'ms_transform.erl', line: 1104]},
            {:lists, :map_1, 2, [file: 'lists.erl', line: 1320]},
            {:lists, :map, 2, [file: 'lists.erl', line: 1315]},
            {:lists, :map_1, 2, [file: 'lists.erl', line: 1320]},
            {:lists, :map_1, 2, [file: 'lists.erl', line: 1320]},
            {:lists, :map, 2, [file: 'lists.erl', line: 1315]},
            {:ms_transform, :fixup_environment, 2,
             [file: 'ms_transform.erl', line: 1112]}
          ]}}
    
    (stdlib 4.1.1) ms_transform.erl:1124: :ms_transform.normalise/1
    (stdlib 4.1.1) ms_transform.erl:222: :ms_transform.transform_from_shell/3
    (stdlib 4.1.1) ets.erl:605: :ets.fun2ms/1
    iex:7: (file)

There’s actually TWO crashes happening here:

  • :ms_transform.normalize is being called with an {:EXIT, ...etc} tuple because the error handling in transform_from_shell wasn’t expecting that shape:

https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/d95d79d1e363879462d9775316896c02b59771ee/lib/stdlib/src/ms_transform.erl#L217-L225

  • that tuple is coming from :ms_transform.fixup_environment, which expects an environment B as a keyword list but gets a map instead:

https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/d95d79d1e363879462d9775316896c02b59771ee/lib/stdlib/src/ms_transform.erl#L1103-L1109

The root cause is that :erl_eval.fun_data/1 is returning a map for the bound variables :thinking: :

iex(9)> :erl_eval.fun_data(fn {x,y,z,:_} when x == id or y == id -> {x,y,z} end)
{:fun_data, %{_@0: 4},
 [
   {:clause, 9,
    [
      {:tuple, 9,
       [{:var, 9, :_x@1}, {:var, 9, :_y@1}, {:var, 9, :_z@1}, {:atom, 9, :_}]}
    ],
    [
      [
        {:op, 9, :orelse, {:op, 9, :==, {:var, 9, :_x@1}, {:var, 9, :_@0}},
         {:op, 9, :==, {:var, 9, :_y@1}, {:var, 9, :_@0}}}
      ]
    ], [{:tuple, 9, [{:var, 9, :_x@1}, {:var, 9, :_y@1}, {:var, 9, :_z@1}]}]}
 ]}
krstfk

krstfk

fun2ms and friends are parse transformations, they can be used from the shell, but the transformation is applied at compile time using ms_transform.hrl which cannot really be done in elixir. See the full documentation especially the warnings at the end of the documentation.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews