Some people wants money for even small part of their work totally forgetting about all rules of how currently known internet is working (for example linking). Title is important part of article. Title is usually added to links. In result someone needs to ask and/or pay someone for adding links, quotes, screenshots etc.
Censoring algorithm (like in Facebook and YouTube) needs to be added to lots of services (mostly for those where people are sharing links, quotes, images, videos and other media). In result small services with simply fall, because creating such algorithm is really expensive. Also there are no fully properly working algorithms.
Summary:
no game play videos - because it’s sharing parts of game
simplest example to imagine are cutscenes
no guides/tutorial videos
ok, maybe only audio (without music) or text only without proper names (which are small part) and quotes
no memes and other caricatures
simplest example to imagine are funny (fail/win) compilation
no quotes
no reviews - ok maybe audio only
different links
Imagine that now all wikis sites (images, quotes etc.), search engines (link + title + quote), videos with music (at least part of it) in background and tons of funny and useful materials are illegal.
It’s at least conflicting with Polish law about quoting.
In Poland, the right to quote allows quotation of excerpts of works and small works as a whole, provided that this is justified by teaching, review, explanation or caricatural motivation.
Source: Right to quote - Wikipedia
Really thank you. I’m not good in law topic, so it will be definitely helpful.
Do you think that this forum will have a problems about that? I still remember lots of links with titles inside shared in lots of topics here. Lots of embedded content like first paragraph, images and videos + all that quotes. I think it could cause a serious copyright problems especially in case community will be forced to introduce algorithm which should automatically it.
Not sure if I well understand that, but everyone posting a link needs to ask a permission of its author even if someone want to popularize library which he/she found at GitHub or Hex, right?
Yep - I think any platform that publishes user-submitted content will. Tbh I think it’s so ridiculous that it would never become law… but then, nothing would surprise me
I think it could be. Although here in the UK the ‘publisher’ has always been responsible for the content on their platform, particularly with regards to copyright infringement, illegal activities and even things like libel.
