fireproofsocks
I stumbled across the desire to want to use get_in while accessing deeply nested parts of a custom struct while needing to provide a default value. I could make a simple defp function to achieve this, but I wanted to see how to handle it using the Access protocol, so I tried something like this:
get_in(my_struct, [:x, Access.key(:y, "my_default)])
Where my struct was shaped something like
%MyStruct{x: %{y: "My Value"}}
# or maybe
%MyStruct{x: %{}}
This results in an error:
** (UndefinedFunctionError) function MyStruct.fetch/2 is undefined (MyStruct does not implement the Access behaviour)
I have 2 followup questions to this:
- Is there an example somewhere in some library that demonstrates how to implement the Access behaviour?
- I’ve read somewhere that structs don’t implement this behaviour for performance reasons – what considerations should be made before implementing the behavior in a struct?
Thanks as always!
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates?
{Textile.render(@product.long_description)}
escapes the HTM...
New
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
When I use Mix.install with a git dependency, using git@github.com:... how do I change the SSH identity used?
I’ve got two Github accoun...
New
Hello all. I have a question as to best practices for code organization when implementing a liveview with a lot of responsibilities.
Sup...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
Hi everyone :waving_hand:
I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #code-sync
- #discussion
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #elixirconf-eu
- #processes
- #security
- #api
- #forms
- #performance










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
NobbZ
Not performance I’d say… Semantic reasons. It doesn’t make sense for all structs.
Also let’s take a fictive set which implements access and returns either true or false, depending on if the value is a member.
The struct itself has only a single field, which shall not be made accessible, but instead access is just a
Map.get(s.m, value, false).I’m not aware of any examples though, but perhaps you can find something in elixir code base for maps or keywordlists.
kip
I think you’ll find this will do the trick:
You can wrap
structkeys inAccess.key/2if required without implementing the wholeAccessprotocol.fireproofsocks
That looks promising… however, it seems to return not the value for
:y(or its default), but instead, the entire map stored at:xkip
Wasn’t quite sure what you were after. Probably you wanted:
Note that since
:xis just a map you can do the following if you don’t need to supply a default (which you shouldn’t have to so since this is about astruct:fireproofsocks
That works! I think I tried a dozen things that were close to that. Thank you!
msante
I came here looking for a simple way to implement Access behaviour by all structs, but I agree with @NobbZ, it doesn’t make sense to do it for all structs.
So I thought of a simpler solution, just ‘unstructure’ those structs where I need to use get_in to access them deeply.
I made this little function:
so when I need it I can do:
nwjlyons
Elixir 1.17 added
get_in/1(Note the arity 1) which works with structs.msante
I’m new to elixir, but wouldn’t this be the same as doing this?
Apart from this, I wonder how I could take advantage of get_in/1 in the case that the list of keys has to be generated dynamically based on certain logic?
frankdugan3
No, becausemy_struct.x.ywould raise an error ifmy_structorxwerenil.get_in/1provides nil-safe access, similar to Javascript’smyObject?.x?.y.Sorry, just realized I didn’t account for the logical
||. So for this specific case, both should do the same thing.nwjlyons
If
xisnildoing.ywill raise aKeyError.get_in/1wont raise aKeyError