schnittchen

schnittchen

Hi,

I’m trying to track down why my testing experience is such a pain because there’s always many files being compiled… I’ve used the inotify trick from https://milhouse.dev/2016/08/11/understanding-elixir-recompilation/ to see which files these are (is there a simpler way?) and tried to understand from mix xref why those files were compiled.

So there’s runtime, compile time and exports dependencies, I learned from mix help xref. So when I do a trivial change like adding a newline in a source file, only compile time dependencies should trigger a recompile.
If I change file A, all files having a (transitive) compile time dependency on A would need to be recompiled.

This lead me to use mix xref graph --label compile --only-direct because my reasoning is that this would show me all non-transitive compile time dependencies, and I should be able to traverse from the changed file to every compiled file via a graph node connection in the output of this command.

Here’s a snippet from the output, the email.ex file has only one dependency shown.

lib/my_app/email.ex
└── lib/my_app/views/mailer_view.ex (compile)

The email file was recompiled when I made a trivial change in a file which, according to mix xref (with the invocation above), was not connected at all to the email file.

I must have some misconception here.

Showing Posts 1 to 10

NobbZ

NobbZ

If A depends on B at compiletime, then any transitive runtime dependency of B is a compiletime dependency of A. As As compiletime is Bs runtime.

axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

If you are using Bamboo (guessing based off the email view), it was a pretty bad offender in that regard. Luckily the latest release improves the situation significantly:
https://github.com/thoughtbot/bamboo/pull/559

Now all of your email-related modules won’t recompile all the time (or maybe it’s vice versa).

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thanks, that helps a bit.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thank you, that makes sense, I had not thought of that.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

There’s a pattern when writing macros to write as little code as possible inside the macro itself, but use functions as much as possible. The simplest such scenario is calling include to import functions into the calling module. This idea has lead to code like this:

defmodule Fancy do
  defmacro __using__(_) do
    quote do
      # do some stuff...
      import unquote(__MODULE__)
    end
  end

  def utility_function do
    # calls other module
    M.other_fun()
  end
end

When A uses Fancy, we have a compile time dependency A => Fancy
Due to the function inside the Fancy module, there is also a runtime dependency Fancy -> M

So when M changes, A needs to be recompiled.

In my case, A had a transitive runtime dep to the Phoenix router (for calling helpers), which created a huuuuuge recompilation loop.

The easiest solution here is to break the utility functions in Fancy out into a separate module (and file).

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I still have the problem that when M is changed, my router gets recompiled, but the only relevant dependencies seem to be these runtime dependencies:

Router -> Controller -> M -> Router

I know a cycle might be bad, but since there is no compile time dependency involved I don’t get why the Router is recompiled.

NobbZ

NobbZ

Is the project public, or can you reproduce it in a fresh project that you can make public?

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I’m afraid it’s not public. I think trying to reproduce it from bottom up is the right approach. Don’t know when I can get to that…

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thanks for the advice, I quickly found the culprit:

I had compile time dependencies from the router to two controllers. Because those controllers had a transitive run time dependency back to the router (redirects using route helpers) and from there to every other controller, changing any controller required the router to be recompiled.

The fix:

# change this:
get "/", MyApp.FooController, :index
# to this:
scope alias: MyApp do
  get "/", FooController, :show
end

simply because now the fully qualified module name of the controller it no longer present in the router.

Two other things I did/tried:

elixirc_options: [verbose: true]

in the project/0 callback of the MixFile, which made the effective dependency chain more obvious.

I also tried setting

config :phoenix, :plug_init_mode, :runtime

not only in dev mode, but in test mode as well, assuming that plug initialization would otherwise happen at compile time and that that would also be the case for the controllers being routed to (since they are plugs as well), but I was wrong here, the default :compile does not make all controllers compile time dependencies of the router.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I got tired of analyzing the output of mix xref so I wrote a thing… If you run into this problem please check out GitHub - schnittchen/why_did_recompile · GitHub and help me improve it

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews