schnittchen

schnittchen

Hi,

I’m trying to track down why my testing experience is such a pain because there’s always many files being compiled… I’ve used the inotify trick from https://milhouse.dev/2016/08/11/understanding-elixir-recompilation/ to see which files these are (is there a simpler way?) and tried to understand from mix xref why those files were compiled.

So there’s runtime, compile time and exports dependencies, I learned from mix help xref. So when I do a trivial change like adding a newline in a source file, only compile time dependencies should trigger a recompile.
If I change file A, all files having a (transitive) compile time dependency on A would need to be recompiled.

This lead me to use mix xref graph --label compile --only-direct because my reasoning is that this would show me all non-transitive compile time dependencies, and I should be able to traverse from the changed file to every compiled file via a graph node connection in the output of this command.

Here’s a snippet from the output, the email.ex file has only one dependency shown.

lib/my_app/email.ex
└── lib/my_app/views/mailer_view.ex (compile)

The email file was recompiled when I made a trivial change in a file which, according to mix xref (with the invocation above), was not connected at all to the email file.

I must have some misconception here.

Showing Posts 1 to 10

NobbZ

NobbZ

If A depends on B at compiletime, then any transitive runtime dependency of B is a compiletime dependency of A. As As compiletime is Bs runtime.

axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

If you are using Bamboo (guessing based off the email view), it was a pretty bad offender in that regard. Luckily the latest release improves the situation significantly:
https://github.com/thoughtbot/bamboo/pull/559

Now all of your email-related modules won’t recompile all the time (or maybe it’s vice versa).

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thanks, that helps a bit.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thank you, that makes sense, I had not thought of that.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

There’s a pattern when writing macros to write as little code as possible inside the macro itself, but use functions as much as possible. The simplest such scenario is calling include to import functions into the calling module. This idea has lead to code like this:

defmodule Fancy do
  defmacro __using__(_) do
    quote do
      # do some stuff...
      import unquote(__MODULE__)
    end
  end

  def utility_function do
    # calls other module
    M.other_fun()
  end
end

When A uses Fancy, we have a compile time dependency A => Fancy
Due to the function inside the Fancy module, there is also a runtime dependency Fancy -> M

So when M changes, A needs to be recompiled.

In my case, A had a transitive runtime dep to the Phoenix router (for calling helpers), which created a huuuuuge recompilation loop.

The easiest solution here is to break the utility functions in Fancy out into a separate module (and file).

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I still have the problem that when M is changed, my router gets recompiled, but the only relevant dependencies seem to be these runtime dependencies:

Router -> Controller -> M -> Router

I know a cycle might be bad, but since there is no compile time dependency involved I don’t get why the Router is recompiled.

NobbZ

NobbZ

Is the project public, or can you reproduce it in a fresh project that you can make public?

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I’m afraid it’s not public. I think trying to reproduce it from bottom up is the right approach. Don’t know when I can get to that…

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thanks for the advice, I quickly found the culprit:

I had compile time dependencies from the router to two controllers. Because those controllers had a transitive run time dependency back to the router (redirects using route helpers) and from there to every other controller, changing any controller required the router to be recompiled.

The fix:

# change this:
get "/", MyApp.FooController, :index
# to this:
scope alias: MyApp do
  get "/", FooController, :show
end

simply because now the fully qualified module name of the controller it no longer present in the router.

Two other things I did/tried:

elixirc_options: [verbose: true]

in the project/0 callback of the MixFile, which made the effective dependency chain more obvious.

I also tried setting

config :phoenix, :plug_init_mode, :runtime

not only in dev mode, but in test mode as well, assuming that plug initialization would otherwise happen at compile time and that that would also be the case for the controllers being routed to (since they are plugs as well), but I was wrong here, the default :compile does not make all controllers compile time dependencies of the router.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I got tired of analyzing the output of mix xref so I wrote a thing… If you run into this problem please check out GitHub - schnittchen/why_did_recompile · GitHub and help me improve it

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews