schnittchen

schnittchen

Hi,

I’m trying to track down why my testing experience is such a pain because there’s always many files being compiled… I’ve used the inotify trick from https://milhouse.dev/2016/08/11/understanding-elixir-recompilation/ to see which files these are (is there a simpler way?) and tried to understand from mix xref why those files were compiled.

So there’s runtime, compile time and exports dependencies, I learned from mix help xref. So when I do a trivial change like adding a newline in a source file, only compile time dependencies should trigger a recompile.
If I change file A, all files having a (transitive) compile time dependency on A would need to be recompiled.

This lead me to use mix xref graph --label compile --only-direct because my reasoning is that this would show me all non-transitive compile time dependencies, and I should be able to traverse from the changed file to every compiled file via a graph node connection in the output of this command.

Here’s a snippet from the output, the email.ex file has only one dependency shown.

lib/my_app/email.ex
└── lib/my_app/views/mailer_view.ex (compile)

The email file was recompiled when I made a trivial change in a file which, according to mix xref (with the invocation above), was not connected at all to the email file.

I must have some misconception here.

Showing Posts 1 to 10

NobbZ

NobbZ

If A depends on B at compiletime, then any transitive runtime dependency of B is a compiletime dependency of A. As As compiletime is Bs runtime.

axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

If you are using Bamboo (guessing based off the email view), it was a pretty bad offender in that regard. Luckily the latest release improves the situation significantly:
https://github.com/thoughtbot/bamboo/pull/559

Now all of your email-related modules won’t recompile all the time (or maybe it’s vice versa).

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thanks, that helps a bit.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thank you, that makes sense, I had not thought of that.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

There’s a pattern when writing macros to write as little code as possible inside the macro itself, but use functions as much as possible. The simplest such scenario is calling include to import functions into the calling module. This idea has lead to code like this:

defmodule Fancy do
  defmacro __using__(_) do
    quote do
      # do some stuff...
      import unquote(__MODULE__)
    end
  end

  def utility_function do
    # calls other module
    M.other_fun()
  end
end

When A uses Fancy, we have a compile time dependency A => Fancy
Due to the function inside the Fancy module, there is also a runtime dependency Fancy -> M

So when M changes, A needs to be recompiled.

In my case, A had a transitive runtime dep to the Phoenix router (for calling helpers), which created a huuuuuge recompilation loop.

The easiest solution here is to break the utility functions in Fancy out into a separate module (and file).

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I still have the problem that when M is changed, my router gets recompiled, but the only relevant dependencies seem to be these runtime dependencies:

Router -> Controller -> M -> Router

I know a cycle might be bad, but since there is no compile time dependency involved I don’t get why the Router is recompiled.

NobbZ

NobbZ

Is the project public, or can you reproduce it in a fresh project that you can make public?

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I’m afraid it’s not public. I think trying to reproduce it from bottom up is the right approach. Don’t know when I can get to that…

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

Thanks for the advice, I quickly found the culprit:

I had compile time dependencies from the router to two controllers. Because those controllers had a transitive run time dependency back to the router (redirects using route helpers) and from there to every other controller, changing any controller required the router to be recompiled.

The fix:

# change this:
get "/", MyApp.FooController, :index
# to this:
scope alias: MyApp do
  get "/", FooController, :show
end

simply because now the fully qualified module name of the controller it no longer present in the router.

Two other things I did/tried:

elixirc_options: [verbose: true]

in the project/0 callback of the MixFile, which made the effective dependency chain more obvious.

I also tried setting

config :phoenix, :plug_init_mode, :runtime

not only in dev mode, but in test mode as well, assuming that plug initialization would otherwise happen at compile time and that that would also be the case for the controllers being routed to (since they are plugs as well), but I was wrong here, the default :compile does not make all controllers compile time dependencies of the router.

schnittchen

schnittchen OP

I got tired of analyzing the output of mix xref so I wrote a thing… If you run into this problem please check out GitHub - schnittchen/why_did_recompile · GitHub and help me improve it

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
pragdave
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates? {Textile.render(@product.long_description)} escapes the HTM...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews