zacksiri

zacksiri

Hey everyone.

So i’ve been developing a model and it started as a straightforward logistic regression model and has evolved into a multi input / multi output model.

Here is what the model looks like

def model do
    # Create three input tensors for CPU, Memory, and Disk
    input_cpu = Axon.input("cpu", shape: {nil, 2})
    input_memory = Axon.input("memory", shape: {nil, 3})
    input_disk = Axon.input("disk", shape: {nil, 2})

    # Create separate prediction paths for each resource
    cpu_prediction =
      Axon.dense(input_cpu, 2, activation: :sigmoid, name: "cpu")

    memory_prediction =
      input_memory
      |> Axon.dense(8, activation: :relu)
      |> Axon.dense(2, activation: :sigmoid, name: "memory")

    disk_prediction =
      Axon.dense(input_disk, 2, activation: :sigmoid, name: "disk")

    # Combine outputs into a single model with multiple outputs
    Axon.container(
      %{
        cpu: cpu_prediction,
        memory: memory_prediction,
        disk: disk_prediction
      },
      name: "results"
    )
end

Here is what the training loop looks like:

 def train(data, opts \\ []) do
    save? = Keyword.get(opts, :save, false)
    model = model()

    state = Keyword.get(opts, :state) || Axon.ModelState.empty()
    iterations = Keyword.get(opts, :iterations, 100)
    epochs = Keyword.get(opts, :epochs, 100)

    # Losses and weights for each output cpu, memory, disk
    losses = [binary_cross_entropy: 0.2, binary_cross_entropy: 0.4, binary_cross_entropy: 0.4]

    state =
      model
      |> Axon.Loop.trainer(losses, Polaris.Optimizers.adamw(learning_rate: 0.01))
      |> Axon.Loop.run(data, state, iterations: iterations, epochs: epochs)

    if save? do
      dump_state(state)
    end

    state
end

I’ve tried the following data structures:

training_data = [
  # Example 1: Good placement (plenty of resources)
  {
    %{
      "cpu" => Nx.tensor([[0.05, 0.825]]),    # [requested, available]
      "memory" => Nx.tensor([[0.0625, 0.65, 0.10]]),
      "disk" => Nx.tensor([[0.004, 0.55]])
    },
    %{
      cpu: Nx.tensor([[1.0, 0.0]]),      # Good placement
      memory: Nx.tensor([[1.0, 0.0]]),   # Good placement
      disk: Nx.tensor([[1.0, 0.0]])      # Good placement
    }
  },
  
  # Example 2: Bad placement (scarce resources)
  {
    %{
      "cpu" => Nx.tensor([[0.05, 0.12]]),     # Low available CPU
      "memory" => Nx.tensor([[0.0625, 0.15, 0.010]]), # Low available memory
      "disk" => Nx.tensor([[0.004, 0.10]])     # Low available disk
    },
    %{
      cpu: Nx.tensor([[0.0, 1.0]]),      # Bad placement
      memory: Nx.tensor([[0.0, 1.0]]),   # Bad placement
      disk: Nx.tensor([[0.0, 1.0]])      # Bad placement
    }
  }
]
training_data = [
  # Example 1: Good placement
  {
    {
      Nx.tensor([[0.05, 0.825]]),
      Nx.tensor([[0.0625, 0.65, 0.010]]),
      Nx.tensor([[0.004, 0.55]])
    },
    {
      Nx.tensor([[1.0, 0.0]]),
      Nx.tensor([[1.0, 0.0]]),
      Nx.tensor([[1.0, 0.0]])
    }
  },
  # Example 2: Bad placement
  {
    {
      Nx.tensor([[0.05, 0.12]]),
      Nx.tensor([[0.0625, 0.15, 0.010]]),
      Nx.tensor([[0.004, 0.10]])
    },
    {
      Nx.tensor([[0.0, 1.0]]),
      Nx.tensor([[0.0, 1.0]]),
      Nx.tensor([[0.0, 1.0]])
    }
  }
]
# Correct training data structure with properly shaped tensors
training_data = [
  # Each training example
  {
    # Inputs tuple
    {
      Nx.tensor([0.05, 0.825]),    # cpu - shape {2}
      Nx.tensor([0.0625, 0.65, 0.010]),   # memory - shape {2}
      Nx.tensor([0.004, 0.55])     # disk - shape {2}
    },
    # Targets tuple
    {
      Nx.tensor([1.0, 0.0]),    # cpu target - shape {2}
      Nx.tensor([1.0, 0.0]),    # memory target - shape {2}
      Nx.tensor([1.0, 0.0])     # disk target - shape {2}
    }
  }
]

None of the above examples seem to work. Any suggestions?

Showing Posts 1 to 1

zacksiri

zacksiri OP

I managed to figure out where I went wrong.

The Axon.container is wrong. The output format needs to be a tuple not a map

So this is invalid

# Change
Axon.container(
      %{
        cpu: cpu_prediction,
        memory: memory_prediction,
        disk: disk_prediction
      },
      name: "results"
    )

# to

 Axon.container(
   {cpu_prediction, memory_prediction, disk_prediction},
   name: "results"
  )

Then the training data set should look like the following:

training_data = [
  {
    # Input map with string keys matching the Axon.input names
    %{
      "cpu" => Nx.tensor([0.05, 0.825]),
      "memory" => Nx.tensor([0.0625, 0.65, 0.75]),
      "disk" => Nx.tensor([0.004, 0.55])
    },
    # Target outputs still as a tuple
    {
      Nx.tensor([1.0, 0.0]),    # cpu target
      Nx.tensor([1.0, 0.0]),    # memory target
      Nx.tensor([1.0, 0.0])     # disk target
    }
  }
]

I am now able to start the training loop. I have no one but myself to blame. I followed Claude down a rabbit hole. I was very happy with my simple logistic regression model.

Then I went to ask it how split the output into cpu, memory, disk instead of just having a single output, and it gave me the model you see above. In it’s defense most of the model was correct the only part that’s wrong is the Axon.container bit. But my lack of experience naively thought it would work.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews