samoloth
Hi,
since my project will require some analytics, I’ve decided to use Postgres + DuckDB via pg_duckdb extension. I’ve spinned up an official pgduckdb container, set up credentials, run mix ash.reset, added pg_duckdb to installed_extensions/0 and finally run mix ash.codegen install_pg_duckdb + mix ash.migrate, but I end up with:
Getting extensions in current project...
Running migration for AshPostgres.DataLayer...
09:31:07.612 [info] == Running 20251218083057 MyApp.Repo.Migrations.InstallPgDuckdbExtensions1.up/0 forward
09:31:07.619 [info] execute "CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS \"pg_duckdb\""
09:31:07.670 [info] == Migrated 20251218083057 in 0.0s
** (Postgrex.Error) ERROR 42P01 (undefined_table) relation "schema_migrations" does not exist
query: INSERT INTO "schema_migrations" ("version","inserted_at") VALUES ($1,$2)
(ecto_sql 3.13.3) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:1108: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.raise_sql_call_error/1
(ecto 3.13.5) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:1000: Ecto.Repo.Schema.apply/4
(ecto 3.13.5) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:500: anonymous fn/15 in Ecto.Repo.Schema.do_insert/4
(my_app 0.1.0) lib/my_app/repo.ex:2: MyApp.Repo.insert/2
(ecto_sql 3.13.3) lib/ecto/migrator.ex:338: anonymous fn/6 in Ecto.Migrator.async_migrate_maybe_in_transaction/7
(my_app 0.1.0) lib/my_app/repo.ex:2: anonymous fn/1 in MyApp.Repo."transaction (overridable 1)"/2
(ecto 3.13.5) lib/ecto/repo/transaction.ex:11: anonymous fn/3 in Ecto.Repo.Transaction.transact/4
(ecto_sql 3.13.3) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:1468: anonymous fn/3 in Ecto.Adapters.SQL.checkout_or_transaction/4
Here are some additional logs:
$ psql -U duck
psql (18.1 (Debian 18.1-1.pgdg12+2))
Type "help" for help.
duck=# \dx
List of installed extensions
Name | Version | Default version | Schema | Description
-----------+---------+-----------------+------------+------------------------------
pg_duckdb | 1.1.0 | 1.1.0 | public | DuckDB Embedded in Postgres
plpgsql | 1.0 | 1.0 | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(2 rows)
duck=# \c my_app_dev
You are now connected to database "my_app_dev" as user "duck".
my_app_dev=# \dx
List of installed extensions
Name | Version | Default version | Schema | Description
---------+---------+-----------------+------------+------------------------------
plpgsql | 1.0 | 1.0 | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(1 row)
my_app_dev=# SELECT * FROM schema_migrations;
version | inserted_at
----------------+---------------------
20251210094714 | 2025-12-18 08:28:00
(1 row)
As you can see, schema_migrations table exists.
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 2- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
samoloth
Ok, I works with ddl transaction disabled. Question is whether it should be disabled by default when it comes to extensions?
zachdaniel
Hmm…it could yes? It must be a restriction of duck db though because we don’t have that issue with Postgres. Makes me wonder if Postgres can actually transactionally install an extension. Feels like probably not.
With that said we define functions etc. which we’d want to be transactional.