samoloth
Hi,
since my project will require some analytics, I’ve decided to use Postgres + DuckDB via pg_duckdb extension. I’ve spinned up an official pgduckdb container, set up credentials, run mix ash.reset, added pg_duckdb to installed_extensions/0 and finally run mix ash.codegen install_pg_duckdb + mix ash.migrate, but I end up with:
Getting extensions in current project...
Running migration for AshPostgres.DataLayer...
09:31:07.612 [info] == Running 20251218083057 MyApp.Repo.Migrations.InstallPgDuckdbExtensions1.up/0 forward
09:31:07.619 [info] execute "CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS \"pg_duckdb\""
09:31:07.670 [info] == Migrated 20251218083057 in 0.0s
** (Postgrex.Error) ERROR 42P01 (undefined_table) relation "schema_migrations" does not exist
query: INSERT INTO "schema_migrations" ("version","inserted_at") VALUES ($1,$2)
(ecto_sql 3.13.3) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:1108: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.raise_sql_call_error/1
(ecto 3.13.5) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:1000: Ecto.Repo.Schema.apply/4
(ecto 3.13.5) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:500: anonymous fn/15 in Ecto.Repo.Schema.do_insert/4
(my_app 0.1.0) lib/my_app/repo.ex:2: MyApp.Repo.insert/2
(ecto_sql 3.13.3) lib/ecto/migrator.ex:338: anonymous fn/6 in Ecto.Migrator.async_migrate_maybe_in_transaction/7
(my_app 0.1.0) lib/my_app/repo.ex:2: anonymous fn/1 in MyApp.Repo."transaction (overridable 1)"/2
(ecto 3.13.5) lib/ecto/repo/transaction.ex:11: anonymous fn/3 in Ecto.Repo.Transaction.transact/4
(ecto_sql 3.13.3) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:1468: anonymous fn/3 in Ecto.Adapters.SQL.checkout_or_transaction/4
Here are some additional logs:
$ psql -U duck
psql (18.1 (Debian 18.1-1.pgdg12+2))
Type "help" for help.
duck=# \dx
List of installed extensions
Name | Version | Default version | Schema | Description
-----------+---------+-----------------+------------+------------------------------
pg_duckdb | 1.1.0 | 1.1.0 | public | DuckDB Embedded in Postgres
plpgsql | 1.0 | 1.0 | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(2 rows)
duck=# \c my_app_dev
You are now connected to database "my_app_dev" as user "duck".
my_app_dev=# \dx
List of installed extensions
Name | Version | Default version | Schema | Description
---------+---------+-----------------+------------+------------------------------
plpgsql | 1.0 | 1.0 | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(1 row)
my_app_dev=# SELECT * FROM schema_migrations;
version | inserted_at
----------------+---------------------
20251210094714 | 2025-12-18 08:28:00
(1 row)
As you can see, schema_migrations table exists.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 2- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
samoloth
Ok, I works with ddl transaction disabled. Question is whether it should be disabled by default when it comes to extensions?
zachdaniel
Hmm…it could yes? It must be a restriction of duck db though because we don’t have that issue with Postgres. Makes me wonder if Postgres can actually transactionally install an extension. Feels like probably not.
With that said we define functions etc. which we’d want to be transactional.