vkryukov
Hi, is there a way to filter by an ad-hoc aggregated field? The following, where Session has many Summaries doesn’t filter:
Session
|> Ash.Query.select([:id])
|> Ash.Query.aggregate(:count_of_summaries, :count, :summary)
|> Ash.Query.filter(:count_of_summaries > 1)
|> Ash.read!(authorize?: false)
it’s just produces an array of Sessions with aggregates set like this aggregates: %{count_of_summaries: 1}.
Essentially what I want is a HAVING query:
select se.id, count(su.id) from sessions se
left join summaries su on se.id == su.session_id
group by se.id
having count(su.id) > 1
I can of course do one of the following:
- Drop to Ecto
- Create an aggregate field, and then a read action filter by this field
But I’m curious if I can do it in REPL without touching the source code and without writing an explicit SQL, for ad-hoc data exploration?
I suspect join_filters might be the answer, but I couldn’t make it work.
Thanks!
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 5 to 1- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
zachdaniel
iex(51)> FiveWhys.Understand.Session |> Ash.Query.aggregate(:count_of_interactions, :count, :interactions) |> Ash.Query.filter(:count_of_interactions > 4) |> Ash.read!(authorize?: false) |> length
:count_of_interactions > 4is comparing an atom to an integer, and the literal comparison is actually expanded before querying to justfilter: true.You can’t reference those dynamic aggregates by name (back in the day you could, but no longer, it had ambiguity/compositional errors).
vkryukov
Here is an example trying to aggregate on a different field. This query returns only 9 records with more than 4 interactions, which agrees with the sql:
This query returns 15 (all of the sessions):
vkryukov
My first example (I assume you are talking about the very first post in the thread) simply doesn’t filter by
count_of_summaries- it returns all entries, even those where count of summaries is 0 or 1. (There are no errors or warnings, though). Is it considered a bug? If yes, I can file a ticket in ash_postgres.Sorry for being the source of all these edge cases :).
The following does work:
zachdaniel
That is actually an out of date example, sorry. You would pass the result of
Ash.Query.Aggregate.newinto the sort, i.eAsh.Query.sort({aggregate, :desc}). However, your filter example should work AFAIK. In what way is it not working?vkryukov
Ok (thanks to ChatGPT o3 w/ search for the idea), is seems that
should work as expected! However, I’m still a bit puzzled why the above (admittedly, naïve) solution doesn’t work, as e.g. the following sorting by an aggregate field is explicitly mentioned in the docs for Ash.Query:
and one would expect that if a sort by an ad-hoc aggregate field works, a filter should work as well.
There is also a parameter
:filterablein Ash.Query.Aggregate.new, which is defined like this::filterable?- Whether or not this aggregate may be used in filters. The default value istrue.and it says that
Aggregate.newis used withQuery.aggregateorAsh.aggregate.