leighshepperson
This is probably a basic question about flows, but:
At the partition stage, where you can specify the number of partitions, does this number only relate to physical processors and nodes?
Or, if the number of partitions exceeds this value, does it also partition against otp processes?
At the reducer stage, you should be able to run the computations in parallel as much as possible right? So it would be an advantage to create as many partitions as possible (supposing you are not copying too much data around)?
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
imetallica
You can set as an argument the number of the partitions you want. By default, Elixir will use the same number of processors on the machine and it’s not designed to work in a distributed fashion (Flow — Flow v1.2.4).
Flow.from_enumerable([1, 2, 3], stages: 3) # To use 3 processesIf I’m not mistaken, the reducer stage is where you join everything together. So, the computations are run in parallel on the mapping stage, not on the reducer stage. So, every time you call
Flow.partition/2, new processes will be used by that computations. For example:leighshepperson
Hi thanks for your reply!
Perhaps I’m thinking about Flow the wrong way:
I imagined it was meant to work like map reduce. So the partition stage would be like the shuffle stage, i.e. there has already been some kind of mapping performed - preferably in parallel , giving us pairs:
Then, these are sent to different nodes (bucketed by key) and the
valuesare reduced in parallel on each of the nodes. Once this has been done, the result can be obtained.Looking at the way this is done in flow, we have: mapping stage, i.e. operations on a collection, then a partition stage, that partitions by some hash key that determines what node the values should go to, and then they are finally reduced. If the operation you want to perform on the
valuesis associative, for example, then there is no reason why it can’t be done in parallel. This is why I was thinking it might leverage it between OTP processes in addition to the number of processor/node partitions.Would it necessarily be a bad idea to have a version of Flow that could do this? I.e., if you know the reducer operations are associative and if the map stage splits up the input data into tmp files indexed by
keythat can only read by the process associated to eachkey, for example, then you could also partition by OTP processes?imetallica
Be in mind that
Flowdoes not work in a distributed way - it only works on a single node.I’m not sure if I understand your question. Can you elaborate more what you want to achieve?
quda
Sorry, I have to revive this old topic because I have new… needs about Flow.
I know that at the level of 2017 Flow didn’t work in a distributed way.
Now is it possible to make it run on multiple nodes ? In such way to distribute partitions among nodes ?
Is there an alternative for distributed MapReduce in Elixir ?