grangerelixx
I have a function Function_1(arg1,arg2,arg3)
I would like to call Function_1 in another function Function_2( ) where only arg3 is passed like arg3 \\ :hello
And I would like to use Function_2( ) in my code like this
result =
arg_1_val
|> Function_2(arg_2_val)
Here arg_1_val is my arg1, arg_2_val is my arg2 and arg3 will be passed in Function_2 definition.
Any inputs on what is the right approach to do this are appreciated.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 7- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
benwilson512
Hi @grangerelixx, can you make this more concrete? You aren’t actually posting valid elixir code, which makes this hard to understand.
grangerelixx
So initially I had this function definition
and I used this function in many parts of my code like this
Since the arg3 is repetitive in some cases, I would like to create two functions which call fucntion_1, say function _with_arg3_equals_5 and function _with_arg3_equals_10.
So now I can use these new functions
derek-zhou
Of cause you can do that. However, I’d suggest you to finish some elixir tutorial on your own first, otherwise it is hard for other people to offer you help without knowing you have a baseline knowledge.
If you have prior experience with functional programming, the official Elixir tutorial should be enough. If you do not have any experience of functional programming, you can consider to purchase a book or some online tutorial that have more details than the official elixir tutorial.
eksperimental
So your question is?
It will help if you can post real code.
My advice is not to create extra functions, just be explicit when you call a function. It will make your code more readable, and lean.
grangerelixx
Thank you all for the inputs. I was able to execute what I intended to.
patrickdm
IMHO, with no risk if being unfaithful with the functions names, you can skip completely the third optional argument:
eksperimental
I will replace “can” with “must”. Otherwise, if you call:
function_with_arg3_equals_5(1, 2, 10000)it defeats the purpose of the funtion name, and you should be callingfunction_1/3