yurko

yurko

I have a simple_one_for_one supervisor that spawns GenServers and I need to make sure there are workers that try to do the same task (it is an expected error and not an exception). I use the new shiny Registry to accomplish it.

Here is the simplified relevant part of the GenServer child that is getting started:

def init(list) do
  case Registry.register(MyCoolRegistry, list[:key], :ok) do
    {:ok, _} -> {:ok, list}
    {:error, reason} -> {:error, reason}
  end
end

the idea is to hook into init callback and return an {:error, reason} if I don’t want this server to proceed.

As far as I can tell it also works as intended, the first time I start a process it works and any further attempts do not spawn processes. What bugs me is the return value that the Supervisor.start_child gives me if I try to start such a “duplicate worker”:

{:error, {:bad_return_value, {:error, {:already_registered, #PID<0.450.0>}}}}

why is it a bad_return_value? What should I return from init callback of a simple_one_for_one GenServer worker to communicate “I’ve checked and decided not to proceed”?

Showing Posts 1 to 3

msambarino

msambarino

{:error, reason} is an unexpected return value for the init callback, the possible return values are listed in the GenServer docs:

Returning {:ok, state} will cause start_link/3 to return {:ok, pid} and the process to enter its loop.

Returning {:ok, state, timeout} is similar to {:ok, state} except handle_info(:timeout, state) will be called after timeout milliseconds if no messages are received within the timeout.

Returning {:ok, state, :hibernate} is similar to {:ok, state} except the process is hibernated before entering the loop. See handle_call/3 for more information on hibernation.

Returning :ignore will cause start_link/3 to return :ignore and the process will exit normally without entering the loop or calling terminate/2. If used when part of a supervision tree the parent supervisor will not fail to start nor immediately try to restart the GenServer. The remainder of the supervision tree will be (re)started and so the GenServer should not be required by other processes. It can be started later with Supervisor.restart_child/2 as the child specification is saved in the parent supervisor. The main use cases for this are:

The GenServer is disabled by configuration but might be enabled later.
An error occurred and it will be handled by a different mechanism than the Supervisor. Likely this approach involves calling Supervisor.restart_child/2 after a delay to attempt a restart.
Returning {:stop, reason} will cause start_link/3 to return {:error, reason} and the process to exit with reason reason without entering the loop or calling terminate/2.

I think you can achieve your desired result by returning {:stop, reason} from your init callback:

def init(list) do
  case Registry.register(MyCoolRegistry, list[:key], :ok) do
    {:ok, _} -> {:ok, list}
    {:error, reason} -> {:stop, reason}
  end
end
yurko

yurko OP

nice of you to post it instead of “RTFM”, I don’t know how I missed it :smiley: Thanks!

UPD in my case it would be returning :ignore

msambarino

msambarino

Happy to help! :smile:

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews