ssss
I think i’m missing something obvious about the syntax but I don’t know what.. the thing is to fetch the current value from a pipe and pass it as argument to the next function, my current implementation looks like:
foo_with_bar = foo |> ... |> add_bar()
something(foo_with_bar, foo_with_bar.bar) |> do_more()
I’d like something like
foo
|> ...
|> add_bar()
|> &something(&1.bar) # get the current "foo" and pass "foo.bar"
|> do_more()
I’ve tried every syntax varations that came to my mind but can’t get it right. It is possible to do that?
Thanks ![]()
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
cschmatzler
Is
fooenumerable? If yes,Enum.mapis your friend.ssss
No, it is just a map, I’ve updated the OP, something is defined as
something/2hst337
There is no
&1syntax in pipes. However, you can rewrite you pipe intoOr you can use then like
Don’t forget to mark the correct answer
v0idpwn
aenglisc
You can use anonymous functions in pipes like so
foo |> (&something(&1, &1.bar)).()However I’d recommend using something like the aforementioned
then/2or perhaps rewriting the logic in a way that would make functions more composable in the first place.dimitarvp
I am late here so I’ll just echo the others: either use
then/2or just make your own functions that accept one thing and return something from inside of it, which makes pipes more composable and more readable.