stjefim

stjefim

Hello!

I want to “save function” (module, name, arity) to the database to be able to call it later, potentially after BEAM was restarted. My plan is to use Functions.capture(module, function_name, arity) to be able to call the function after “loading” from the database.

How can I obtain module, function name and arity from a function capture (e.g. &MyModule.my_function/0) to “save function”? I have found Functions.info(fun) function, however, the documentation has a note saying that it should be used for debug only. What are the reasons it is debug only? What are the alternatives?

Showing Posts 1 to 10

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Not sure I follow. You have the module, the function name and the arity beforehand, why use the result of Function.capture result at all? Why not cut out the middleman and just store those 3 pieces in the DB? :thinking:

stjefim

stjefim OP

Not sure if I understood you correctly, but here is the clarification. I plan to use Functions.capture to “load function” from the database. My problem is how to “store function” to the database from the Elixir code, i.e. I want to write a function function_to_string(f) which can be called like this function_to_string(&MyModule.my_function/0) and would return [module: "MyModule", name: "my_function", arity: 0]" and this result I would store in the database.

So to answer your question - I agree I just need to store these 3 pieces in the DB, however, how to obtain them from a function capture.

bartblast

bartblast

Creator of Hologram

Hey @stjefim, are you aware of Kernel.apply/3?

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

I don’t think there is a general solution as function can be anonymous. Also, storing function in a db may not be the best idea. Code will change, db record last for a long time. Also, think of the security implication.

stjefim

stjefim OP

Thank you, it will be useful after “loading function” - no need to do Functions.capture.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

You want to store the function’s bytecode itself in the DB? :thinking:

I still don’t get your requirement.

stjefim

stjefim OP

I agree with all your points:

  • I will not support anonymous functions.
  • Haven’t thought about versioning yet, but not a big problem for me.
  • Agreed - but can do some validation to allow only certain functions to be called.
stjefim

stjefim OP

No, I will not store byte code in DB. My requirement is to convert function capture, e.g. &MyModule.my_function/0 into module name as string, function name as string and function arity as integer.

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

That’s not possible. Because you can’t turn a function value back to MFA, just like you can’t turn a value back to the variable name.

You can store the function value itself though:

binary = :erlang.term_to_binary(&MyModule.my_function/0)
# store in db
fun = :erlang.binary_to_term(binary)
fun.()

However, as I mentioned above, that’s a big foot gun.

jswanner

jswanner

The underlying Erlang function docs says it’s “mainly” for debugging:

This BIF is mainly intended for debugging, but it can sometimes be useful in library functions that need to verify, for example, the arity of a fun.

That said, the :telemetry library uses it to verify you supply an external function as a handler.

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews