chouzar
I would like to get from “where” a particular function is executed. Is this possible in elixir? For example:
defmodule Sender do
def to(pid) do
send(pid, build_message())
end
defp build_message() do
%{
module: __MODULE__, # Can this be obtained at runtime?
from: self(),
message: "Hola!"
}
end
end
In the future I would like to separate the build_message function into its own thing so it doesn’t need to know the __MODULE__s value (which I guess its defined at compile time).
Macros might be a solution here
but have been avoiding them
wonder if anyone has any pointers on this?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
hauleth
Could you describe your use case exactly? Because on such abstract example it is hard to reason and maybe provide you better answer.
In general it seems like XY problem.
chouzar
Thanks @hauleth appreciate your comments
and you’re probably right with the XY problem
but let me better explain my case (which admitelly is not much of a use case at this point).
The idea behind comes from wanting to better standardize messaging between different system “components”; concretely I’m trying to apply a standard to messages between my
LiveViewandLiveComponentmodules.I have this struct defined:
When sending messages between
LiveComponents toLiveViewssince both share the samepid, I’m thinking it would be nice to differentiate between them via the component’s module name:I understand even this example will seem nonsensical, what is the point? why not just send a tuple? What I think this achieves is:
I’m currently just experimenting (not a clear path), but would like to expand this idea and see where it goes.
al2o3cr
A macro would be useful here -
Ecto.Repodoes exactly that to pass along the name of the module that’s callinguse Ecto.Repoin all the functions:https://github.com/elixir-ecto/ecto/blob/83d5b7df6faa77b29e88cd665ede812710577eb8/lib/ecto/repo.ex#L267-L269
chouzar
Thanks a lot for the snippet!
will parse it out.
Looks like macros would be the way to go for what I want (implicit behaviour / transformation).