nathany
Looking to speed up our build on GitHub Actions. Right now the slowest task is compiling dependencies, which takes over 3 minutes. This is surprising, because the _build folder should be cached, but it behaves as though it isn’t.
I’ve found that the command mix deps.compile does a full recompile locally too, even if I run it twice in a row. Not sure if this is a regression in Elixir 1.13 or expected behaviour?
I’ll walk through the relevant portions of the GitHub Actions config.
setup-beam
For starts, using erlef/setup-beam, which is fairly standard. I don’t know if we need to specify anything extra for rebar? This is a fairly standard Phoenix app.
env:
MIX_ENV: test
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
- uses: erlef/setup-beam@v1
with:
otp-version: "24.2.1"
elixir-version: "1.13.3"
cache
Then onto actions/cache which is using the standard example for Elixir, other than that we’ve added a v2- prefix at some point to bust an old cache.
- uses: actions/cache@v2
id: cache
with:
path: |
deps
_build
key: v2-${{ runner.os }}-mix-${{ hashFiles('**/mix.lock') }}
restore-keys: |
v2-${{ runner.os }}-mix-
download dependencies
Downloading dependencies, including some private ones, is a step that we can reliably skip if there is a cache-hit. If the lock file hasn’t changed, everything still works and these two steps take zero seconds, proving that the cache is working.
- name: Authenticating Hex
if: steps.cache.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
run: mix hex.organization auth ${ORG_NAME} --key ${HEX_ORG_KEY}
env:
HEX_ORG_KEY: ${{ secrets.HEX_ORG_KEY }}
ORG_NAME: ${{ secrets.ORG_NAME }}
- name: Install dependencies
if: steps.cache.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
# NOTE: AppSignal has its hooks in other dependencies, so we tell it to compile first
run: |
mix do deps.get, deps.compile appsignal --include-children
We do have some special handling for AppSignal here (which should maybe be moved into a separate step).
code formatting
We found that we can check code formatting before compiling, which saves some cycles by “failing fast.”
- name: Check code formatting
run: mix format --check-formatted
Compiling
The main event. I recently separated out the compiling of dependencies, just to see the time they take vs. our app. The dependencies take 3-4 minutes to compile, whereas our app takes about 30 seconds or so.
- name: Compile dependencies
run: |
mix deps.compile
- name: Compile
run: |
mix compile --warnings-as-errors
If I skip the deps.compile step then compile will compile all the deps.
If the mix.lock file hasn’t changed, and if the _build folder is cached, then I would hope that deps.compile would be very fast or could even be skipped.
But that isn’t the case right now. ![]()
Further steps
There are further steps for static code analysis and running the tests (which incidentally takes less time than compiling dependencies). I’m going to stop here because it’s the compilation that I’m interested in.
If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Also happy to open a bug with Elixir if you think it’s a regression.
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex










First 10 of 12 Posts
josevalim
I can reproduce
mix deps.compilerecompiling Erlang dependencies on Elixir v1.13. But it doesn’t recompile Elixir deps and it doesn’t recompile when runningmix compile. Does this match the behaviour you see?EDIT: to be clear, it doesn’t recompile Erlang dependencies. It invokes Rebar3 but it is mostly a no-op.
josevalim
If you can isolate this error into a smaller app with reproduction steps, I will be glad to take a look at it!
nathany
Hi José. Thanks for the rapid reply. I think I see what you mean.
Before I didn’t recognize the difference between Erlang dependencies and Elixir dependencies compiling. So as I understand now, this is running multiple times locally (Erlang-only):
In CI it is different, in that there is a full recompile, which includes Elixir dependencies.
What this makes me think is that
depsand_buildmay not be the only folders that should be cached?I found this closed issue that suggests caching
.setup-beam.It will take me a little while to see if I can reproduce the error in a smaller app, but that’s always a good exercise. I may try a few other things first. If you or anyone has any further suggestions, that would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Nathan.
nathany
That
.setup-beamstuff didn’t seem to help.This is an example that includes a subset dependencies from the larger app. Included some github ones just in case that makes a difference.
https://github.com/anmlnath/ci_example
The hope is that there is someway to avoid run the recompile of all the dependencies after every change:
https://github.com/anmlnath/ci_example/runs/5163078749?check_suite_focus=true
josevalim
You can also look at our setup in Livebook. I don’t think we are recompiling dependencies in there: GitHub - livebook-dev/livebook: Automate code & data workflows with interactive Elixir notebooks · GitHub
aifrak
I was curious so I tried to play with your repository example but I could not reproduce the issue.
However, I think I have found the cause: the cache is not created yet when the next workflow is trying to access it. It is more a Github Action issue.
Commit
4fa8fe4pushed at 11 Feb 2022, 22:22 GMT:Commit
206f14bpushed at 11 Feb 2022, 22:25 GMT:Both are trying to get a cache with the key
Linux-mix-ca19570116549225dad4bcc705d9f4fe0f00a3bca16e60d7e730c353018faeb2. But the first workflow has not finished to create the cache. Not the end of the message “another job may be creating this cache.”Potential solution:
depsand_builddepsshould be end with${{ hashFiles('**/mix.lock') }}_buildshould be end with${{ hashFiles('**/mix.lock') }}-${{ hashFiles( '**/lib/**/*.{ex,eex}', '**/config/*.exs', '**/mix.exs' ) }}hashFilesfor your needsHere an example of the final result:
I don’t remember where I have seen this, but the reason is that the cache from
depsshould depend on changes frommix.lockonly. Whereas_buildshould depend on changes from “the rest” (application code, config, …). For_buildcache, a new hash will be generated each timelib,configormix.exsare changed, which will avoid potential conflicts between workflows when getting/creating a cache key.nathany
@aifrak Thanks so much for taking the time to investigate, and pointing out the “another job may be creating this cache” error on the example repository.
I’m not seeing that error on my actual app right now, just “Cache hit occurred on the primary key v2-Linux-mix-{hash}, not saving cache.” That said, it does make sense to split up
deps/_buildcaching, or useneeds: testor maybe even combine those jobs.While I wasn’t that concerned with caching the
mix compileif I could getmix deps.compileto cache, I may give that a go, based on your example.@josevalim You speak the truth. It looks like the “Check warnings” step in Livebook isn’t recompiling all the dependencies. I need to get to the bottom of why the discrepancy, and then report back.
Thanks all
nathany
After experimenting with the previously linked stand-alone repository, I made the following changes:
With the cache working properly, the compile step is taking around 20 seconds instead of 3.5 minutes or so.
Thanks again for the assistance and examples,
Nathan.
thbar
Thanks for your tip right there! A lot of tutorials mention
mix deps.compilefollowed bymix compile, and I saw a lot of slow logs in one of my apps CI:These are only Erlang apps, your post put me on the right track.
The trick was to only call
mix compile(Accélération de la build by thbar · Pull Request #2277 · etalab/transport-site · GitHub).Thanks!
axelson
Do you (or anyone else) know of any workaround for this? I really like to have my dependencies compilation output separated from my application’s compilation output and it would be nice to keep that property without requiring a recompilation of all the erlang dependencies.