pmjoe
Does anyone know any good example of web applications without Phoenix? I think Elixir is so damn simple, but every time I create a Phoenix project is just too much. I just want to do something with Ecto, Plug, and Htmx.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
dimitarvp
@wojtekmach’s repository of single-file apps might be very helpful to you:
https://github.com/wojtekmach/mix_install_examples/blob/727e0a70aeb194593eac913afc224c5c0e0f09ea/plug_cowboy.exs
It was for me.
Yeah, same here. I admire the work of the Phoenix team, I simply wish we had PhoenixLite or something.
mayel
This is mentioned often and I wonder if simply highlighting the
--no-*options in the getting started guide would help, because a lot of Phoenix is optional:--no-assets- equivalent to--no-esbuildand--no-tailwind--no-dashboard- do not include Phoenix.LiveDashboard--no-ecto- do not generate Ecto files--no-esbuild- do not include esbuild dependencies and assets. We do not recommend setting this option, unless for API only applications, as doing so requires you to manually add and track JavaScript dependencies--no-gettext- do not generate gettext files--no-html- do not generate HTML views--no-live- comment out LiveView socket setup in assets/js/app.js. Automatically disabled if --no-html is given--no-mailer- do not generate Swoosh mailer files--no-tailwind- do not include tailwind dependencies and assets. The generated markup will still include Tailwind CSS classes, those are left-in as reference for the subsequent styling of your layout and componentsEdit: these are the files created when you use all those flags:
Edit 2: These are the dependencies included:
And the extra dependencies in lockfile:
So apart from adding a
--no-telemetryflag I’m not sure how much lighter it could reasonably get while still being sensible?LostKobrakai
This sentiment surely comes up regularly, but having seen people attempt this over the years I‘m not sure skipping phoenix (the library) is worth it.
Plug for simple stuff can be quite simple code and less files, but on the other hand any more advanced stuff will need you to write more code than you‘d need to write with phoenix around. Like doing a redirect needs you to manually deal with location headers and also will be missing the security validation phoenix does for local paths. I‘ve seen similar things quite a bit over the years where people ask how to do a thing they know is simple from phoenix in a bare plug app, where it turns out having phoenix would‘ve been the simpler answer.
Phoenix can be stripped down quite a lot, you can use a plug router on a phoenix endpoint without issues (if you‘re not using router mounted LVs) and you‘ll still have most of the functionality of phoenix around.
dimitarvp
I am strictly focusing on amount of files, not the removal of features, some of which are critical for most commercial projects (like HTML/templating and DBs/Ecto). Phoenix projects have way too many files IMO.
I know that people who constantly work on Phoenix apps have gotten used to it but as a guy who is leaning on the backend side of things, Phoenix’s generated files relating to UI are confusing.
F.ex. I fail to see point of views to this day. Surely for a lot of projects you can always rely on the defaults that are injected in your code by the generator but these view files are just kind of… sitting there. They are basically an artifact of the framework’s chosen abstractions that leak into your project’s source code.
I’d try to do without them as a start and see how far I can take it.
dimitarvp
I agree. Even though the amount of files to me seem too much I’ve also experienced first-hand how extremely useful Phoenix is the moment your needs start growing.
xpressgetaway
100% agree.
mayel
I went ahead with a simple PR: clarify what's optional in phx.new by mayel · Pull Request #5783 · phoenixframework/phoenix · GitHub
pmjoe
My point is that with Phoenix I feel that the framework becomes your application. If I’m not mistaken Dave Thomas has talked a lot about this. Phoenix for me is the outer layer of an application, it’s the API or how it communicates with the outside world.
LostKobrakai
I‘d suggest differentiating phoenix the library from code, which is generated by phoenix generators. Because most of what the latter provides is not set in stone as all.
It‘s one way of doing things, which caters best to the usecase of powering crud generators for people trying to quickly scaffold apps. You‘re free if not encouraged to adjust those things to fit whatever else you need.
dimitarvp
Sounds like a good opportunity to upstream some more generators for other cases, then.