lubien

lubien

tl;dr: I want to know the most phoenix way of letting users fill a {:array, :string} input via live view form component.

  defp deps do
    [
      {:argon2_elixir, "~> 2.0"},
      {:phoenix, "~> 1.6.0"},
      {:phoenix_ecto, "~> 4.4"},
      {:ecto_sql, "~> 3.6"},
      {:postgrex, ">= 0.0.0"},
      {:phoenix_html, "~> 3.0"},
      {:phoenix_live_reload, "~> 1.2", only: :dev},
      {:phoenix_live_view, "~> 0.16.0"},
    ]
  end

inputs

I’m currently experimenting with the current schema and the relevant prop is :synonyms with {:array, :string} type. The user should be able to write any amount of items there.

defmodule MyApp.MyContext.Tag do
  use Ecto.Schema
  import Ecto.Changeset

  schema "tags" do
    field :synonyms, {:array, :string}
    timestamps()
  end

  @doc false
  def changeset(tag, attrs) do
    tag
    |> cast(attrs, [:synonyms])
  end
end

I was able to make both edit and create work with some assignments called @synonyms and dynamically rendering inputs called name="tag[synonyms][]" using the code below:

defmodule MyAppWeb.TagLive.FormComponent do
  use MyAppWeb, :live_component

  alias MyApp.MyContext

  @impl true
  def update(%{tag: tag} = assigns, socket) do
    changeset = MyContext.change_tag(tag)

    {:ok,
     socket
     |> assign(assigns)
     |> assign(:changeset, changeset)
     |> assign(:synonyms, tag.synonyms)} # <---- relevant
  end

  @impl true
  def handle_event("validate", %{"tag" => tag_params}, socket) do  # <---- no changes needed
    # tag_params => %{ "synonyms: ["foo", "bar"], rest... }, which is ok :)
    changeset =
      socket.assigns.tag
      |> Jobs.change_tag(tag_params)
      |> Map.put(:action, :validate)

    {:noreply, assign(socket, :changeset, changeset)}
  end

  # unrelated ...
end
  <.form
    let={f}
    for={@changeset}
    id="tag-form"
    phx-target={@myself}
    phx-change="validate"
    phx-submit="save">
  
    <%= label f, :slug %>
    <%= text_input f, :slug %>
    <%= error_tag f, :slug %>
  
    <%= label f, :type %>
    <%= select f, :type, Ecto.Enum.values(MyApp.MyContext.Tag, :type), prompt: "Choose a value" %>
    <%= error_tag f, :type %>

    <%= for s <- @synonyms do %>  <---------------- here
      <%= label f, :slug %>
      <input name="tag[synonyms][]" value={s}>
      <%= error_tag f, :slug %>
    <% end %>  
  
    <div>
      <%= submit "Save", phx_disable_with: "Saving..." %>
    </div>
  </.form>

From there I should also make “add more” and “remove” inputs which is fine but I was left wondering if I’ve missed something obvious on the docs or somewhere else that I wasn’t able to find by my searches (as most results seem to deal with embedded schemas instead of an array on the very own schema)

Showing Posts 1 to 4

sukidhar

sukidhar

did u solve this

if so could u let me know

lubien

lubien OP

It’s been a while so I’m not certain but I think I just went ahead and used the things described on the original topic above

nilskj

nilskj

Hello! I had the exact same requirement and a lot of troubles but I got it to work now with the new versions of stuff. Idk if idiomatic, I’m new here :smiley:

So basically I have a similar Ecto schema with an array of strings as features that I want to edit in a form component:

schema "products" do
    ...
    field :features, {:array, :string}, default: [""]
  end

In my form live component I used the same trick as presented earlier here from couple years ago, with the product[features][] syntax in the name property for the input they get mapped correctly to this array.

<%= for {entry, index} <- Enum.with_index(Ecto.Changeset.get_field(@form.source, :features, [])) do %>
          <div class="flex items-center gap-2">
            <.input value={entry} name="product[features][]" type="text" label="Feature" />
            <div phx-click="remove_feature" phx-value-index={index} phx-target={@myself}>
              <.icon
                name="hero-x-mark"
                class="w-8 h-8 relative top-4 bg-red-500 hover:bg-red-700 hover:cursor-pointer"
              />
            </div>
          </div>
        <% end %>

It was a bit tricky getting the index so I wrapped it into an Enum.with_index to make the deletion mutation easier to manage.

Here are my working but a bit ugly? click handlers as well:

  def handle_event("add_feature", _, socket) do
    existing_features = Ecto.Changeset.get_field(socket.assigns.form.source, :features, [])

    append_feature =
      Catalog.change_product(socket.assigns.product, %{
        "features" => existing_features ++ [""]
      })

    {:noreply, assign(socket, form: to_form(append_feature))}
  end

  def handle_event("remove_feature", %{"index" => index}, socket) do
    updated_features =
      Ecto.Changeset.get_field(socket.assigns.form.source, :features, [])
      |> List.delete_at(String.to_integer(index))

    remove_feature =
      Catalog.change_product(socket.assigns.product, %{
        "features" => updated_features
      })

    {:noreply, assign(socket, form: to_form(remove_feature))}
  end

Is this maybe better to do in an embedded schema? Then I guess I could use inputs_for or something. Maybe that is the way!

kuzyn

kuzyn

Very insightful thread for me :slight_smile:

Is the name="map_name[list_name][]" behavior documented anywhere? It looks very strange to me since you could assume it’s a simple HTML name property without any template magic…

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
pragdave
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates? {Textile.render(@product.long_description)} escapes the HTM...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews