lubien

lubien

tl;dr: I want to know the most phoenix way of letting users fill a {:array, :string} input via live view form component.

  defp deps do
    [
      {:argon2_elixir, "~> 2.0"},
      {:phoenix, "~> 1.6.0"},
      {:phoenix_ecto, "~> 4.4"},
      {:ecto_sql, "~> 3.6"},
      {:postgrex, ">= 0.0.0"},
      {:phoenix_html, "~> 3.0"},
      {:phoenix_live_reload, "~> 1.2", only: :dev},
      {:phoenix_live_view, "~> 0.16.0"},
    ]
  end

inputs

I’m currently experimenting with the current schema and the relevant prop is :synonyms with {:array, :string} type. The user should be able to write any amount of items there.

defmodule MyApp.MyContext.Tag do
  use Ecto.Schema
  import Ecto.Changeset

  schema "tags" do
    field :synonyms, {:array, :string}
    timestamps()
  end

  @doc false
  def changeset(tag, attrs) do
    tag
    |> cast(attrs, [:synonyms])
  end
end

I was able to make both edit and create work with some assignments called @synonyms and dynamically rendering inputs called name="tag[synonyms][]" using the code below:

defmodule MyAppWeb.TagLive.FormComponent do
  use MyAppWeb, :live_component

  alias MyApp.MyContext

  @impl true
  def update(%{tag: tag} = assigns, socket) do
    changeset = MyContext.change_tag(tag)

    {:ok,
     socket
     |> assign(assigns)
     |> assign(:changeset, changeset)
     |> assign(:synonyms, tag.synonyms)} # <---- relevant
  end

  @impl true
  def handle_event("validate", %{"tag" => tag_params}, socket) do  # <---- no changes needed
    # tag_params => %{ "synonyms: ["foo", "bar"], rest... }, which is ok :)
    changeset =
      socket.assigns.tag
      |> Jobs.change_tag(tag_params)
      |> Map.put(:action, :validate)

    {:noreply, assign(socket, :changeset, changeset)}
  end

  # unrelated ...
end
  <.form
    let={f}
    for={@changeset}
    id="tag-form"
    phx-target={@myself}
    phx-change="validate"
    phx-submit="save">
  
    <%= label f, :slug %>
    <%= text_input f, :slug %>
    <%= error_tag f, :slug %>
  
    <%= label f, :type %>
    <%= select f, :type, Ecto.Enum.values(MyApp.MyContext.Tag, :type), prompt: "Choose a value" %>
    <%= error_tag f, :type %>

    <%= for s <- @synonyms do %>  <---------------- here
      <%= label f, :slug %>
      <input name="tag[synonyms][]" value={s}>
      <%= error_tag f, :slug %>
    <% end %>  
  
    <div>
      <%= submit "Save", phx_disable_with: "Saving..." %>
    </div>
  </.form>

From there I should also make “add more” and “remove” inputs which is fine but I was left wondering if I’ve missed something obvious on the docs or somewhere else that I wasn’t able to find by my searches (as most results seem to deal with embedded schemas instead of an array on the very own schema)

Showing Posts 1 to 4

sukidhar

sukidhar

did u solve this

if so could u let me know

lubien

lubien OP

It’s been a while so I’m not certain but I think I just went ahead and used the things described on the original topic above

nilskj

nilskj

Hello! I had the exact same requirement and a lot of troubles but I got it to work now with the new versions of stuff. Idk if idiomatic, I’m new here :smiley:

So basically I have a similar Ecto schema with an array of strings as features that I want to edit in a form component:

schema "products" do
    ...
    field :features, {:array, :string}, default: [""]
  end

In my form live component I used the same trick as presented earlier here from couple years ago, with the product[features][] syntax in the name property for the input they get mapped correctly to this array.

<%= for {entry, index} <- Enum.with_index(Ecto.Changeset.get_field(@form.source, :features, [])) do %>
          <div class="flex items-center gap-2">
            <.input value={entry} name="product[features][]" type="text" label="Feature" />
            <div phx-click="remove_feature" phx-value-index={index} phx-target={@myself}>
              <.icon
                name="hero-x-mark"
                class="w-8 h-8 relative top-4 bg-red-500 hover:bg-red-700 hover:cursor-pointer"
              />
            </div>
          </div>
        <% end %>

It was a bit tricky getting the index so I wrapped it into an Enum.with_index to make the deletion mutation easier to manage.

Here are my working but a bit ugly? click handlers as well:

  def handle_event("add_feature", _, socket) do
    existing_features = Ecto.Changeset.get_field(socket.assigns.form.source, :features, [])

    append_feature =
      Catalog.change_product(socket.assigns.product, %{
        "features" => existing_features ++ [""]
      })

    {:noreply, assign(socket, form: to_form(append_feature))}
  end

  def handle_event("remove_feature", %{"index" => index}, socket) do
    updated_features =
      Ecto.Changeset.get_field(socket.assigns.form.source, :features, [])
      |> List.delete_at(String.to_integer(index))

    remove_feature =
      Catalog.change_product(socket.assigns.product, %{
        "features" => updated_features
      })

    {:noreply, assign(socket, form: to_form(remove_feature))}
  end

Is this maybe better to do in an embedded schema? Then I guess I could use inputs_for or something. Maybe that is the way!

kuzyn

kuzyn

Very insightful thread for me :slight_smile:

Is the name="map_name[list_name][]" behavior documented anywhere? It looks very strange to me since you could assume it’s a simple HTML name property without any template magic…

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews