laiboonh

laiboonh

Despite copy and pasting the output, the comparison still return false

iex(2)> Money.to_string! Money.new(:AED, 1234)
"AED 1,234.00"
iex(3)> (Money.to_string! Money.new(:AED, 1234)) == "AED 1,234.00"
false

With more inspection, i can see they are different

ex(5)> (Money.to_string! Money.new(:AED, 1234)) |> IO.inspect(base: :hex)          
<<0x41, 0x45, 0x44, 0xC2, 0xA0, 0x31, 0x2C, 0x32, 0x33, 0x34, 0x2E, 0x30, 0x30>>
"AED 1,234.00"
iex(6)> "AED 1,234.00" |> IO.inspect(base: :hex)                          
<<0x41, 0x45, 0x44, 0x20, 0x31, 0x2C, 0x32, 0x33, 0x34, 0x2E, 0x30, 0x30>>
"AED 1,234.00"

Problem is how can i get Money.to_string output to output “regular” space characters so that comparison passes?
I looked into Cldr.Number — Cldr Numbers v2.31.0 but don’t see anything useful.

Showing Posts 1 to 7

kip

kip

ex_cldr Core Team

Most, if not all, currency formats in CLDR use a non-breaking space between the currency and the amount. This is, I think, correct because it would be potentially confusing if a word or line wrap were to occur between the two parts of the string.

If you really want to force a space than you can define your own format like:

# Note this is forcing a breaking space, 0x20
iex> Money.to_string!(Money.new(:AED, 1234), format: "¤ #,###.00")
"AED 1,234.00"
iex> Money.to_string!(Money.new(:AED, 1234), format: "¤ #,###.00") == "AED 1,234.00"
true

However I don’t recommend it for a few reasons:

  1. Not all currencies follow that format. They have variable number of decimal places. Some formats don’t have a space between the currency symbol and the amount.
  2. You’re not going to be local aware (different locales have different formats for the same currency).

In general I don’t think the comparison you’re doing adds a lot of value - although of course I don’t know your use case and I may be missing something. If so, please let me know what you’re trying to achieve and I’ll help.

ex_cldr_number (that does the actually formatting for ex_money) has thousands of tests. If some formatting is incorrect then it’s a bug and I will fix it.

laiboonh

laiboonh OP

Just mainly using this comparison in tests. For example

assert msg = "Final Price: AED 1,234.00"
kip

kip

ex_cldr Core Team

Ok, I thought that was probably it. I think the best way to do that is to capture the output in iex and then, if you consider it to be correct, to copy/paste the emitted value into your tests. That’s exactly how I build most of the tests ex_cldr_numbers and ex_money.

laiboonh

laiboonh OP

I actually did what you suggested before this. It seems like copy and pasting still pasted the output as regular space character. But no worries i can type it out now

kip

kip

ex_cldr Core Team

That’s interesting! Maybe some editors convert non-breaking to breaking space when pasting? I’ll do some searching on that so I can document it for the next person. Please update the thread if you find the cause?

codeanpeace

codeanpeace

If the goal of the test isn’t the formatting of the msg string, but rather that the msg string contains the correct currency and amount, I’d consider using String.contains?/2 in the test instead.

assert String.contains?(msg, "AED")
assert String.contains?(msg, "1,234.00")
aiwaiwa

aiwaiwa

It must be an iex console limitation! In a regular editor you would’ve seen a visual warning (VSCode here):

But that would need to be a test output to capture such a nuance.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews