taguniversalmachine
Hi,
I am trying to define a parser for a simple grammar and I am getting hung up on something that I think is simple but I can’t figure out.
The grammar has two main structures, a definition and an invocation, of the form:
invocationname($a$b)(c<>d<>)
definitionname[(a<>b<>)($c$d)somestuff:someotherstuff]
I have the invocation one working, but for some reason even though the definition structure is very similar, I get an error that it is expecting the opening bracket, even though I am sending it.
The whole parser definition is here, and I will copy my interaction with it:
defmodule Atomix.Invocation.Parser do
import NimbleParsec
name = ascii_string([?A..?z], min: 1)
definition_name = ascii_string([?A..?z], min: 1)
invocation_name = ascii_string([?a..?z], min: 1)
content_name = ascii_string([?A..?Z], min: 1)
destination_place =
string("$")
|> concat(name)
destination_list =
destination_place
|> repeat(destination_place)
source_place =
name
|> string("<>")
source_list =
source_place
|> repeat(source_place)
place_of_resolution =
string("+")
contained_definitions =
string("=")
defparsec(
:invocation,
invocation_name
|> string("(")
|> concat(destination_list)
|> string(")")
|> string("(")
|> concat(source_list)
|> string(")")
)
defparsec(
:definition,
definition_name
|> string("[")
|> concat(source_list)
|> concat(destination_list)
|> concat(place_of_resolution)
|> string(":")
|> concat(contained_definitions)
|> string("]")
)
end
iex(2)> Parser.invocation(“dfsd($a$b)(a<>b<>)”)
{:ok, [“dfsd”, “(”, “$”, “a”, “$”, “b”, “)”, “(”, “a”, “<>”, “b”, “<>”, “)”],
“”, %{}, {1, 0}, 18}
iex(3)> Parser.definition(“fdafa[(a<>b<>)fdsaf:fadf]”)
{:error, “expected string "["”, “(a<>b<>)fdsaf:fadf]”, %{}, {1, 0}, 6}
Why am I getting the error about expecting the bracket when it is clearly there?
Thanks for any pointers.
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #elixirconf-us
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
kip
The problem is that you are defining character ranges that encompass the
[character:In the ASCII character set,
?a..?zand?A..?Zare not contiguous with each other. For example:So you can see that
[fits in the range?A..?zand therefore your[is being consumed bydefinition_name. You can add a call todebug()in your combinator pipeline which will output some information that can often help with tracking down these issues.I think you probably meant:
kip
I think your
definitionparser still needs some development but I took a stab at a version ofinvocationthat is a bit more idiomatic:In use:
taguniversalmachine
Ooh thank you very much, I don’t know how many years I’ve been looking at ASCII charts and I didn’t even think to check, Thank you very much for the tip about debug() and also for how to properly use tags!
taguniversalmachine
Actually I do have one follow up question, if you don’t mind - what is the purpose of using ignore(string()) as opposed to just string()? I find it works both ways and the doc doesn’t really explain what ignore does. I mean I understand conceptually that string() would require the string to be present while ignore will just tolerate it but that doesn’t seem to be the way it works, ignore actually requires the string.
fuelen
ignoresimply instructs not to put data from combinator to the output.Let’s say we have the following parser:
But when you remove
ignorecombinator, the output is this:taguniversalmachine
oh gotcha, thank you very much for the explanation!