laiboonh

laiboonh

Out of curiousity how does conditional rendering :if heex attribute work? I look into the web console logs and see that if condition is true the static content is passed over to the browser in s: [...]. But whenever the condition is false how does the browser know to remove the static content?

Is there something in the liveview javascript that handles this for us behind the scene?

Showing Posts 1 to 10

milangupta

milangupta

The processing is happening on the server side ..
The beauty of this is security ..

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

The merging of what’s in the DOM vs what is supposed to be in the DOM is handled by morphdom in the browser. The phoenix liveview javascript does all the reconsiliation of dynamic and static parts, but from there the template is passed to morphdom for applying any changes to the DOM.

milangupta

milangupta

Benjamin - so I understand this precisely too .. can you explain this a bit simpler .. what CPU is processing the :if ? Is it the server or the client (browser) ?
My interpretation was that the conditional processing etc. (heex template => html/css) is done on the server side ? Do I have it wrong ?

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

That’s not completely correct. The :if condition is indeed checked on the server, but there isn’t plain html sent to the client. There’s an optimized diff sent to client, which either includes content or doesn’t. There’s more code on the client to figure out what that diff means, and the result is applied by morphdom, which takes some html and updates the DOM to match that html.

milangupta

milangupta

I understand/know the morphdom and diff management .. however, one of the strengths of elixir/phoenix vs. javascript that I thought was a big plus was that conditional code isn’t pushed to the client side. So, in effect, the client browser would never ever see what is behind the

> <div :if={false}> **secret stuff** </div>

.. that isn’t sent over the websocket .. right ?

With javascript, your code is basically distributed to and running on the browser (I know I am oversimplifying .. ), free to be inspected by anyone ..

codeanpeace

codeanpeace

My current mental model of how conditional rendering works in LiveView:

When the :if condition is false by default, then browser won’t receive the content guarded by the :if. Then if the :if condition subsequently switches from false to true, the server sends an optimized diff representing the addition of that guarded content to the client which updates the DOM via morphdom.

When the :if condition is true by default, then browser will receive the content guarded by the :if. Then if the :if condition subsequently switches from true to false, the server sends an optimized diff representing the removal of that guarded content to the client which updates the DOM via morphdom.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

Exactly.

I think this is what the OP was asking about. The diff doesn’t contain any content and also doesn’t seem to contain any instructions for deleting content, so something on the client needs to be able to understand that such a diff means “removal of what is there”.

codeanpeace

codeanpeace

As much as I enjoy Elixir/Phoenix, that’s a server side rendering advantage and not language/ecosystem specific.

Right, because the :if condition defaults to false, your secret stuff is safe so long as that condition never turns true. There’s a caveat though, it’s pretty common to set the :if condition to an assign and when doing so, it is important to note that if there’s an unguarded handle_event/info defined that toggles that assign, a malicious user could reveal your secret stuff.

milangupta

milangupta

Thanks for explaining it .. I think you nailed it for me.
I had not yet understood the scenario where the conditional was based on an assign. Makes sense ..

Kind regards.

codeanpeace

codeanpeace

You’re welcome! For posterity’s sake, here’s a simple naive example of what I meant by the caveat above.

defmodule MyAppWeb.SecretsLive do
  use MyAppWeb, :live_view

  def mount(_params, %{"current_user_id" => user_id} = _session, socket) do
    user = MyApp.Accounts.get_user!(user_id)
    socket =
      socket
      |> assign(socket, :admin, user.admin?}
      |> assign(socket, :show, false)  # aka hide by default
    {:ok, socket}
  end

  def render(assigns) do
    ~H"""
      <div :if={@admin}>
        <button phx-click="toggle_secrets">Toggle Secret Stuff</button>
      </div>
      <div :if={@show}> **secret stuff** </div>
    """
  end

  # even though non-admins will not have a button that triggers this event
  # a malicious non-admin user that knows about this unguarded event handler
  # could directly trigger and exploit this event handler to reveal your secret stuff
  def handle_event("toggle_secrets", _value, socket) do
    {:noreply, assign(socket, :show, !socket.assigns.show)}
  end
end

To learn more about this and the importance of authorization/permission when it comes to LiveView events, check out this guide on the Security considerations of the LiveView model.

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews