venomnert
Context:
I’m reading through “Elixir in Action” by“ Saša Jurić. In section 5.2.2 he provides the following algorithm on how processes read messages:
The receive expression works as follows:
- Take the first message from the mailbox.
- Try to match it against any of the provided patterns, going from top to bottom.
- If a pattern matches the message, run the corresponding code.
- If no pattern matches, put the message back into the mailbox at the same position it originally occupied. Then try the next message.
- If there are no more messages in the queue, wait for a new one to arrive. When a new message arrives, start from step 1, inspecting the first message in the mailbox.
- If the after clause is specified and no message is matched in the given amount of time, run the code from the after block.
Scenario:
Assume that a process receives these three message in the following order:
- message a
- message b
- message c
Here is the process receive statement:
receive do
{:message_b, value} -> IO.puts "Message b is complete"
{:message_c, value} -> IO.puts "Message c is complete"
end
Question:
Will the process always start from the top of the queue all the time, even if it already knows that it can’t handle the first message? In above case it always start off by trying to see if it can handle message_a (which it can’t) and then continue to proceed to the next message.
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Kia ora,
We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
Hello,
I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
There are three potential reasons for members of this forum to have a look at https://vutuv.de
You are tired or annoyed of LinkedIn.
Yo...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex










First 4 of 4 Posts
sb8244
Here’s something you can run locally:
My output:
You can see that msg_a will pile up in the process queue, as @jwarlander mentions
jwarlander
Yes, indeed it will.. The result, if your process doesn’t ever flush out otherwise unhandled messages, is that it may end up sifting through millions of them just to process those that are relevant. This is something that you’ll need to be aware of; either crash on an unexpected message, or (at some point at least) throw it away.
al2o3cr
FWIW this behavior is one of the reasons it’s usually preferable to use structured machinery around
send+receive, likegen_serverand friends - unexpected messages will be converted to crashes.dom
If you’d like the gory details: The BEAM Book: Understanding the Erlang Runtime System