chvanikoff
Hi, I’m in need to test that some process (in my particular case, it’s a Phoenix channel) receives some message from another process (via handle_info). Unfortunately, I didn’t found anything suitable in stdlib and wonder if there’s a common approach for doing this, or maybe I missed something in stdlib? As of now I see 2 ways of testing this: mocking receiver process and watching it’s message queue, but both of the approaches don’t seem to be clear and correct way of doing this.
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates?
{Textile.render(@product.long_description)}
escapes the HTM...
New
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
When I use Mix.install with a git dependency, using git@github.com:... how do I change the SSH identity used?
I’ve got two Github accoun...
New
Hello all. I have a question as to best practices for code organization when implementing a liveview with a lot of responsibilities.
Sup...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
Hi everyone :waving_hand:
I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #code-sync
- #discussion
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #elixirconf-eu
- #processes
- #security
- #api
- #forms
- #performance










Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
gregvaughn
I know of 2 ways. The first, and the one I prefer, is for the test itself to send in the
selfpid to be the receiver of the message. Then you can use ExUnit’sassert_received. The other approach is to, only in test code, use:erlang.process.infochvanikoff
Unfortunately, I don’t see a way the first one would work for me - it would be pretty painful and require including tests logic into my app code itself. Second one is the one I think of, but as I already wrote, it doesn’t seem to be really good solution.
rvirding
Three ways I know you can do this but neither are very straight forward:
:dbg.handle_info/2function in your module in the process in which you are interested.:sysmodule to install a special debug handler then turn on tracing with:sys.trace/2. More high level and OTPish, but I have never tested it.The tracing always works but might be a bit tricky to set up. It also works very well if you want inspect running production systems. Not surprising as that is what the tracing was designed for.
josevalim
https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/a3834735543977c988e1cd0e78069076a464cf44/test/phoenix/code_reloader_test.exs#L31
https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/a3834735543977c988e1cd0e78069076a464cf44/test/phoenix/code_reloader_test.exs#L39
chvanikoff
@rvirding @josevalim thanks, will try this approach now. I think it might be a good idea to do this as a part of ExUnit API
chvanikoff
@josevalim maybe something like this could be put into ExUnit?
josevalim
I would prefer not. It must be used rarely and having it as part of the assertions may lead developers to write tests that rely on implementation details (did this process receive a message) instead of asserting on a particular behaviour from receiving that message.
mushu8
For later reference, trace messages receive GenServer call methods :