chvanikoff
Hi, I’m in need to test that some process (in my particular case, it’s a Phoenix channel) receives some message from another process (via handle_info). Unfortunately, I didn’t found anything suitable in stdlib and wonder if there’s a common approach for doing this, or maybe I missed something in stdlib? As of now I see 2 ways of testing this: mocking receiver process and watching it’s message queue, but both of the approaches don’t seem to be clear and correct way of doing this.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
gregvaughn
I know of 2 ways. The first, and the one I prefer, is for the test itself to send in the
selfpid to be the receiver of the message. Then you can use ExUnit’sassert_received. The other approach is to, only in test code, use:erlang.process.infochvanikoff
Unfortunately, I don’t see a way the first one would work for me - it would be pretty painful and require including tests logic into my app code itself. Second one is the one I think of, but as I already wrote, it doesn’t seem to be really good solution.
rvirding
Three ways I know you can do this but neither are very straight forward:
:dbg.handle_info/2function in your module in the process in which you are interested.:sysmodule to install a special debug handler then turn on tracing with:sys.trace/2. More high level and OTPish, but I have never tested it.The tracing always works but might be a bit tricky to set up. It also works very well if you want inspect running production systems. Not surprising as that is what the tracing was designed for.
josevalim
https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/a3834735543977c988e1cd0e78069076a464cf44/test/phoenix/code_reloader_test.exs#L31
https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/a3834735543977c988e1cd0e78069076a464cf44/test/phoenix/code_reloader_test.exs#L39
chvanikoff
@rvirding @josevalim thanks, will try this approach now. I think it might be a good idea to do this as a part of ExUnit API
chvanikoff
@josevalim maybe something like this could be put into ExUnit?
josevalim
I would prefer not. It must be used rarely and having it as part of the assertions may lead developers to write tests that rely on implementation details (did this process receive a message) instead of asserting on a particular behaviour from receiving that message.
mushu8
For later reference, trace messages receive GenServer call methods :