deadego
Trying to drop a specific stream from a socket in LV via.
{_, socket} =
pop_in(socket.assigns.streams[filter_string])
{_, socket} =
pop_in(socket.assigns.streams.__configured__[filter_string])
{:noreply, socket}
But get
[error] GenServer #PID<0.1919.0> terminating
** (KeyError) key "test" not found in: %{__changed__: MapSet.new([]), __configured__: %{}, __ref__: 1}
:erlang.map_get("test", %{__changed__: MapSet.new([]), __configured__: %{}, __ref__: 1})
(elixir 1.18.3) lib/map.ex:318: Map.update!/3
(phoenix_live_view 1.0.9) lib/phoenix_component.ex:1447: Phoenix.Component.update/3
(phoenix_live_view 1.0.9) lib/phoenix_live_view/lifecycle.ex:223: anonymous fn/2 in Phoenix.LiveView.Lifecycle.after_render/1
(phoenix_live_view 1.0.9) lib/phoenix_live_view/lifecycle.ex:237: Phoenix.LiveView.Lifecycle.reduce_socket/3
(phoenix_live_view 1.0.9) lib/phoenix_live_view/lifecycle.ex:222: Phoenix.LiveView.Lifecycle.after_render/1
(phoenix_live_view 1.0.9) lib/phoenix_live_view/channel.ex:992: anonymous fn/4 in Phoenix.LiveView.Channel.render_diff/3
(telemetry 1.3.0) /home/dead/Dev/gale/deps/telemetry/src/telemetry.erl:324: :telemetry.span/3
(phoenix_live_view 1.0.9) lib/phoenix_live_view/channel.ex:983: Phoenix.LiveView.Channel.render_diff/3
(phoenix_live_view 1.0.9) lib/phoenix_live_view/channel.ex:819: Phoenix.LiveView.Channel.handle_changed/4
(stdlib 6.2.2) gen_server.erl:2345: :gen_server.try_handle_info/3
(stdlib 6.2.2) gen_server.erl:2433: :gen_server.handle_msg/6
(stdlib 6.2.2) proc_lib.erl:329: :proc_lib.init_p_do_apply/3
Last message: %Phoenix.Socket.Message{topic: "lv:phx-GDKJG9wvY7sfv3iB", event: "event", payload: %{"event" => "delete_filter", "type" => "click", "value" => %{"filter" => "test"}}, ref: "17", join_ref: "4"}
State: %{socket: #Phoenix.LiveView.Socket<id: "phx-GDKJG9wvY7sfv3iB", endpoint: GaleWeb.Endpoint, view: GaleWeb.HomePageLive, parent_pid: nil, root_pid: #PID<0.1919.0>, router: GaleWeb.Router, assigns: %{filters: ["test"], __changed__: %{}, current_user: #Gale.Users.User<__meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "users">, id: "f08b5683-2009-4b58-8a09-105e2fddb5d0", email: "asdf@asdf.com", confirmed_at: nil, inserted_at: ~U[2025-04-01 01:47:38Z], updated_at: ~U[2025-04-01 01:47:38Z], ...>, flash: %{}, filter_form: %Phoenix.HTML.Form{source: #Ecto.Changeset<action: nil, changes: %{}, errors: [], data: %{}, valid?: true, ...>, impl: Phoenix.HTML.FormData.Ecto.Changeset, id: "form", name: "form", data: %{}, action: nil, hidden: [], params: %{}, errors: [], options: [method: "post"], index: nil}, streams: %{:__changed__ => MapSet.new([]), :__configured__ => %{"test" => [dom_id: #Function<0.13511000/1 in GaleWeb.HomePageLive.handle_event/3>]}, :__ref__ => 1, "test" => %Phoenix.LiveView.LiveStream{name: "test", dom_id: #Function<0.13511000/1 in GaleWeb.HomePageLive.handle_event/3>, ref: "0", inserts: [], deletes: [], reset?: false, consumable?: false}}, live_action: :home}, transport_pid: #PID<0.1908.0>, ...>, components: {%{}, %{}, 1}, topic: "lv:phx-GDKJG9wvY7sfv3iB", serializer: Phoenix.Socket.V2.JSONSerializer, join_ref: "4", redirect_count: 0, upload_names: %{}, upload_pids: %{}}
[
I assume there is a better way?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley:
Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Hello
I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
kokolegorille
Maybe like this?
But I don’t really understand what You are doing with your pop_in…
deadego
https://github.com/deadego/gale/blob/main/lib/gale_web/live/home_page_live.ex#L19-L38
This will give you a better idea of what I’m dealing with.
In short I would like to remove the condition from having to check if it already had a prior stream with that key since the prior config will cry if I try to do it twice but also. Removing the stream vs just emptying it.
garrison
I don’t think streams are meant to be used dynamically like this. The docs for stream_configure/3 specifically suggest calling it in
mount/2(i.e. statically).What is the use case here? That is to say, what are the items in the streams?
deadego
this is the site https://gale.deadegos.org/
As you can see I build up filters of the bluesky jetstream feed.
I want to add remove them as I want.
Currently this works. though leaves a little cruft left over from “deleted” streams
I guess I could consolidate to one stream and just manage the one.
deadego
also I think the only reason it states that in the docs to put the config in mount is because it will error if you try to config twice, thus you will need a condition
garrison
I see, I often caution people about over-using streams but this is about as good a use-case as I can think of
From what I can tell the cause of the error you’re getting is that
assigns.streams[name]is only populated when you actually callstream/4, if I had to guess probably only within that render before it’s cleared. While the key inassigns.streams.__configured__, I assume, lasts the duration of the LiveView.I think (I did not bother to test) that
pop_in/1does not handle the missing key, butpop_in/2does. There is some language in the docs forpop_in/1suggesting the “complete path must be visible to the macro”.Does this work?
I was just using that line from the docs to demonstrate that the streams APIs are not meant to be used dynamically. Obviously you technically can, as you have demonstrated, but there is no API to clean up the dangling streams (as you have discovered).
BTW, even if you remove the stream from the server correctly there will still be some accounting left on the client to handle the streams, and if you re-use a name I would imagine you could break something in a weird way.
Consider making a feature request for better dynamic functionality.
garrison
Another approach: you could instead make a “pool” of streams (configured in
mount/2) and then dynamically assign filters to them, resetting them when the filter changes. I think this would work fine because obviously there are only so many streams you can display at once on a screen anyway.deadego
Yeah this is what I meant by consolidating to just a single long lived stream.
IE multi dimensional list
garrison
What I mean is you can allocate multiple streams, like:
And then update
:filterswhen filters are added/removed, resetting the streams as needed.By pooling the streams and re-using them you are working around the lack of delete functionality.
deadego
yeah we are saying the same thing.
Though I fear this may has a unexpected side effect