nittin
I’m using ExCoveralls to measure code coverage in an Ash-based project, and I noticed that lines written through Ash DSL macros don’t appear as SLOC in the coverage report.
For example, in the following action:
create :create_task do
...
change set_attribute(:state, "created")
end
the macro line isn’t counted toward coverage. However, when I rewrite it using an anonymous function:
create :create_task do
...
change fn changeset, _context ->
Ash.Changeset.set_attribute(changeset, :state, "created")
end
end
the lines inside the function are counted as SLOC.
Is there any recommended way to get meaningful coverage metrics when using Ash DSL macros?
Are there any tools or approaches that better support coverage reporting for Ash-generated code?
Thanks!
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 2- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
ken-kost
They are compile-time constructs, it’s a limitation of coverage tools with metaprogramming, not specific to Ash. You did find a trick to turn it into runtime code but the question is why even do this, i.e. 100% sounds better but beyond that is it really necessary?
arcanemachine
Meaningful code coverage != 100% code coverage
Ensure the code is well-tested, then look at the number that comes out. That’s the number you need. 80% is generally considered very good.
Don’t waste your time trying to get 100% code coverage.