CharlesO
Say we have a simple list comprehensions:
for x <- [some_list] do
case _compute(x) do
nil -> nil # directly exclude this value from output
val -> val # add this value to output as usual
end
end
Short of running the whole comprehensions, the filtering out nil values,
is there a better was to do this?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
Linuus
You can have a filter in your comprehension:
EDIT:
I think I misread the question. I’d probably just use
Enum.reduceinsteadtty
niland other values i.e. thecasedoes not filter outnilnilvalues are a result of_computeunless you know the exact values ofxwhich would result in a_computer(x) == nilyou can not prefilter the input.CharlesO
I feel the post filter is a wasted step, if we can have a way to exclude the nil values directly, that’s my point…
CharlesO
still wont help… you mean Enum.filter
dgmcguire
don’t know if you consider this better, but here’s a solution
List.foldr([1, 2, nil, 4], [], fn x, acc -> if is_nil(x), do: acc, else: [x*2|acc] end)edit: it’s also not clear to me whether it had to be a comprehension or not, so maybe this isn’t a solution?
CharlesO
Got this elegant solution from StackOverflow:
I think the idea is if
_compute(x)is truthy, returny, else iffalse / nil, it will be skipped, and you only have to evaluate_compute(x)onceLinuus
No, I mean
Enum.reducethough it will look similar to your solution.Linuus
That’s a nice solution