tim2CF
Hey!
I’m playing around with macro and I’m thinking - is it possible to completely expand quoted expression (including all private and public macro)?
Simplest example which I actually can’t fully expand:
defmodule Hello do
defmacrop foo, do: {:y, [], nil}
def bar(x, foo()), do: x + y
end
for example let’s try to use Macro.expand/2
quote do
defmodule Hello do
defmacrop foo, do: {:y, [], nil}
def bar(x, foo()), do: x + y
end
end
|> Macro.expand(__ENV__)
|> Macro.to_string
|> Code.format_string!
|> IO.puts
result is
:elixir_module.compile(
Hello,
{:__block__, [],
[
{:=, [],
[
{:result, [], Kernel},
{:__block__, [],
[
{:defmacrop, [context: Elixir, import: Kernel],
[{:foo, [context: Elixir], Elixir}, [do: {:{}, [], [:y, [], nil]}]]},
{:def, [context: Elixir, import: Kernel],
[
{:bar, [context: Elixir], [{:x, [], Elixir}, {:foo, [], []}]},
[do: {:+, [context: Elixir, import: Kernel], [{:x, [], Elixir}, {:y, [], Elixir}]}]
]}
]}
]},
{{:., [], [:elixir_utils, :noop]}, [], []},
{:result, [], Kernel}
]},
[{:q, nil, :_@0, q}],
__ENV__
)
interesting line is
{:bar, [context: Elixir], [{:x, [], Elixir}, {:foo, [], []}]},
where foo is AST of macro call, but not result of this call (should be {:y, [], Elixir})
Is there any way to expand it and get resulting quoted expression somehow?
Trending in Questions
Hey guys,
I’ve got a huge CSV ( around 10 GB ) that needs to be processed hourly
Do you guys have any suggestions what is the best prac...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
I’m trying to set up Emacs with elixir-ls via lsp-mode and credo via Flycheck. This should mostly be preconfigured as Flycheck picks up c...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
OvermindDL1
Macro.expandonly expands the specific AST node passed in, not every node within it. I generally do this to fully expand something as much as Elixir’s AST goes (won’t touch special forms and so forth):Results in:
I.E. pipe like
|> Macro.prewalk(&Macro.expand(&1, __ENV__))instead.Do note, when compiling a module it is the actual
:elixir_module.compilecall that expands macros ‘within’ a module, so when you are quoting an entire module definition then macro’s defined within it aren’t expanded until that itself is run. It will expand things in proper scope though otherwise.tim2CF
Thanks! But in your example there is still this
foomacro, which is not expandedAs I understood the only way to get fully expanded AST is
:elixir_module.compile?OvermindDL1
That’s because it is not a macro,
:fooat that point is a function invocation of something calledfoothat is not in scope at that point. A macro cannot be expanded unless it is in scope.Nah, expanding is fine, you just have to make sure it is all in scope first, and
def blah...inside the ast itself does not bring anything into scope at that time as it needs to be in scope ‘prior’ to the expand call.