daanturo
Without defining a function, is there an equivalent of Clojure’s loop or Scheme’s named let where I can run a tail-call loop expression while accumulating multiple values?
There’s Enum.reduce, but the number of iterations may not known in advance, and carrying multiple accumulated values with reduce is clunky.
Thank you in advance.
Edit: provided my concrete usage in reply.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
Eiji
Often there are multiple ways to solve one problem. You need to give an example of what you want to do including example input, output and what you tried so far, before anybody would give you a satisfying solution.
daanturo
I am writing an Elixir script version of Merge pdf files and automatically create a table of contents with each file as an entry
At the step of bookmark (TOC) generation, we need to iterate through the list of input files, while keeping
page_counterincreasing and the accumulated bookmarks (not necessarily as we can append to the file at each step but I prefer to write at once).Current Elixir version: make use of reduce, it works but doensn’t look ideal.
An Emacs Lisp version may look like this (making use of https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Local-Variables.html#index-named_002dlet):
(gist link cause I couldn’t see this with syntax highlighting when replying
pdf-toc-gen.el · GitHub )
dimitarvp
Your Elixir code looks good to me, what’s your issue with it?
One thing I’d change is make it more obvious what part of a tuple you’re getting at the end e.g. not use
elembut thethenconstruct – just to make it little more readable.But other than that the code looks good IMO.
Eiji
Having 2-element
Tupleasaccis not a shame. Manyreduce-based solutions written by senior developers are using it. Your code is really good enough.However there is other way to write same code. You can use a simple pattern matching solution, for example:
Personally I like separating
accumulationandprocesslogic, as in example above, which makes the code more clear.