samuelventura
What is the proper way to evaluate a string and get a stack trace that honors the provided file: script.exs environment across all the code defined in that script regardless of whether it is executed in the current process or deferred to an async task?
The first two samples refer to the provided file: script.exs on the stack trace and the last one loses it.
Sample 1 keeps the reference to script.exs in its stacktrace
iex(1)> Code.eval_string("""
try do
raise "RAISE"
rescue
e -> {e, __STACKTRACE__}
end
""", [], file: "script.exs")
{{%RuntimeError{message: "RAISE"},
[
{:elixir_eval, :__FILE__, 1, [file: ~c"script.exs", line: 2]},
{:elixir, :eval_external_handler, 3,
[file: ~c"src/elixir.erl", line: 386, error_info: %{module: Exception}]},
...
]}, []}
Sample 2 keeps the reference to script.exs in its stacktrace
iex(2)> Code.eval_string("""
fun = fn -> raise "RAISE" end
try do
fun.()
rescue
e -> {e, __STACKTRACE__}
end
""", [], file: "script.exs")
{{%RuntimeError{message: "RAISE"},
[
{:elixir_eval, :__FILE__, 1, [file: ~c"script.exs", line: 1]},
{:elixir, :eval_external_handler, 3,
[file: ~c"src/elixir.erl", line: 386, error_info: %{module: Exception}]},
...
]}, [fun: #Function<43.81571850/0 in :erl_eval.expr/6>]}
Sample 3 loses the reference to script.exs in its stacktrace
iex(3)> Code.eval_string("""
fun = fn -> raise "RAISE" end
Task.async(fn ->
try do
fun.()
rescue
e -> {e, __STACKTRACE__}
end
end) |> Task.await(:infinity)
""", [], file: "script.exs")
{{%RuntimeError{message: "RAISE"},
[
{:elixir, :eval_external_handler, 3,
[file: ~c"src/elixir.erl", line: 386, error_info: %{module: Exception}]},
{:erl_eval, :do_apply, 7, [file: ~c"erl_eval.erl", line: 919]},
{:erl_eval, :try_clauses, 10, [file: ~c"erl_eval.erl", line: 1233]},
{Task.Supervised, :invoke_mfa, 2,
[file: ~c"lib/task/supervised.ex", line: 101]}
]}, [fun: #Function<43.81571850/0 in :erl_eval.expr/6>]}
Need this to implement scripting with accurate tracing of unhandled exceptions in async code.
Things looking into at the moment:
- Process.info(self(), :current_stacktrace)
- Last call optimisation
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #performance










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
josevalim
What happens in the last example if you call
List.flatten([])or any similar example, so the last instruction is not raise, but something else to prevent last call optimization on raise?samuelventura
You mean like sample below? Apparently the reference to script.exs is lost as well.
josevalim
Yes, that’s what I meant, but I was able to reproduce the issue in the shell too.
Unfortunately evaluation has less precise stacktraces because it is literally implemented by emulating the runtime in pure Erlang/Elixir and I think splitting the anonymous function is exactly those trade-offs. I will try to see if some aspects can be improved upstream, but it may not be trivial (or it may make things more expensive).
garrison
Wait, there’s a BEAM emulator in the codebase?! That is not how I expected that to work at all, lol. Out of curiosity, where would I find that code?
josevalim
Oh, it works on Erlang AST rather than BEAM.
you can find it on erl_eval.
samuelventura
Found this notice which seems to explain it.
https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/blob/e27cd15715bc6997c5a51497af49934c5e9221b2/lib/elixir/src/elixir.erl#L321-L336