zac

zac

I’m trying to set up a couple of validations – unclear what the best approach is:

    attribute :allowed_types, {:array, :atom} do
      allow_nil? false
      default [:value_add, :non_value_add]
    end

    attribute :default_type, :atom do
      allow_nil? false
    end

  validations do
    # this works but is clunky (what if allowed set is > 2?)
    validate one_of(:allowed_types, [[:value_add, :non_value_add], [:value_add], [:non_value_add]])
    # this doesn't work ... :allowed_types is supposed to be an attribute, not an atom... :/
    validate one_of(:default_type, [:allowed_types])
  end

Potentially pretty obvious, but the intention of the two validations:

  1. The first is to make sure the :allowed_types conforms to some combination of one or more of a set (currently, just [:value_add, :non_value_add])
  2. The second is to make sure that the value of :default_type is one of the types specified in the attribute :allowed_types

I can live with #1 for now (until the list grows, but then it becomes a problem). #2 seems like it may require a custom validation, but I’m unsure if that’s correct… or how to write one quite yet…

Showing Posts 1 to 3

zac

zac OP

edit – I realized what I pasted in last night was a complete mess. Updated below.

I came up with a custom validation, and a refinement (but it still doesn’t work quite right):

  @allowed_types [:value_add, :non_value_add]

  ...
  validations do
    validate attribute_in(:allowed_types, @allowed_types)
    validate {TypesAreAllowed, attribute: :default_type}
   end
end

defmodule COE.Walk.ActivityStereotype.Validations.TypesAreAllowed do
  @moduledoc """
  Custom validator that checks to make sure a list of types includes one or more values from @allowed_types.
  """

  @spec init(nil | maybe_improper_list() | map()) ::
          {:error, <<_::208>>} | {:ok, nil | maybe_improper_list() | map()}
  def init(opts) do
    if is_atom(opts[:attribute]), do: {:ok, opts}, else: {:error, "attribute must be an atom!"}
  end

  def validate(changeset, opts) do
    value = Ash.Changeset.get_attribute(changeset, opts[:attribute])
    allowed_types = Ash.Changeset.get_attribute(changeset, :allowed_types)

    #if value != nil && Enum.all?(value, &(&1 in allowed_types)) do
    if value != nil && value in allowed_types do
      :ok
    else
      {:error, field: opts[:attribute], message: "allowed types must be one of #{allowed_types}"}
    end
  end
end

Seems like a reasonable implementation – but if there is something more concise, please do point it out. Thanks!

zachdaniel

zachdaniel

Creator of Ash

You can use the constraints on the :atom type to do this, or an Ash.Type.Enum

With an enum type:

defmodule YourApp.Types.AllowedWhateverTypes do
  use Ash.Type.Enum, values: ~w(value_add non_value_add)a
end


attributes do
  attribute :allowed_types, {:array, YourApp.Types.AllowedWhateverTypes} do
    allow_nil? false
  end

  attribute :default_type, YourApp.Types.AllowedWhateverTypes do
    allow_nil? false
  end
end

With constraints:

@allowed_types ~w(value_add non_value_add)a

attributes do
  attribute :allowed_types, {:array, :atom} do
    constraints items: [one_of: @allowed_types]
    allow_nil? false
  end

  attribute :default_type, :atom do
    constraints one_of: @allowed_types
    allow_nil? false
  end
end
zac

zac OP

Thanks for the different approaches - very useful!

One more question though…

What if :allowed_types is itself an attribute of the type? In other words, I can set the allowable types on the entity with a call like this:

# .create(:name, :allowed_types)
ActivityStereotype.create("Meetings", [:one_on_one, :team, :board_room]) 

And now I want to make sure that if the :default_type is also set (on the same entity) it must be one of the types allowed when I created the entity. See it’s self-referential. First you set the allowed types, then you make sure the default type is one of the allowed types.

# .create(:name, :allowed_types, :default_type)
ActivityStereotype.create("Meetings", [:one_on_one, :team, :board_room], :team) 

I’m having some trouble getting the bit that says “given a new :default_type, check to make sure it’s one of the :allowed_types that I just provided”.

My solution is this custom validator, but it seems a bit hardcoded.

defmodule COE.Walk.ActivityStereotype.Validations.TypesAreAllowed do
  @moduledoc """
  Custom validator that checks to make sure a list of types includes one or more values from @allowed_types.
  """

  def init(opts) do
    if is_atom(opts[:attribute]), do: {:ok, opts}, else: {:error, "attribute must be an atom!"}
  end

  def validate(changeset, opts) do
    value = Ash.Changeset.get_attribute(changeset, opts[:attribute])
    allowed_types = Ash.Changeset.get_attribute(changeset, :allowed_types)

    #if value != nil && Enum.all?(value, &(&1 in allowed_types)) do
    if value != nil && value in allowed_types do
      :ok
    else
      {:error, field: opts[:attribute], message: "allowed types must be one of #{allowed_types}"}
    end
  end
end

My very first attempt (which did not work) was:

  validations do
    validate attribute_in(:default_type, :allowed_types)
  end

And it just seemed like there ought to be a simple solution to this that I haven’t discovered yet (beyond the custom validator).

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews