kototama
Is it possible to pass the SO_RCVTIMEO socket option (man 7 socket ) to an Erlang/Elixir socket with inet:setopts/2 and how?
Bonus question: how do you do it with ranch?
Help would be highly appreciated!
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #security










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
cmkarlsson
First. I know nothing about this. Have a read below and feel free to completely ignore everything
Looking at the manual page of
inet:setopts/2you can use therawoption to set options not explicitly supported bysetoptsThey have an example setting
TCP_LINGER2to 30 using this:inet:setopts(Sock,[{raw,6,8,<<30:32/native>>}])or in elixir
:inet.setopts(sock, [{:raw, 6, 8, <<30::32-native>>}])Unfortunately I don’t know the protocol level or option number for SO_RCVTIMEO (it might be platform dependent?) and I don’t know how to format a timeval struct outside of C.
My best guess would be something like:
And then use the above values to try to set the option.
This might be very dangerous. Are 1 and 20 and the timeval sizes and format platform and machine architecture dependent? Is the option even set? I don’t know how to find out.
As for
ranchyou should be able to useTransport:setopts/2which means eitherranch_tcporranch_ssldepending on transport used. There might also be an option to pass the raw option in when you start a listener through the options.kototama
Thank you, it’s helping!
2Sjch8AT
In the documentation page socket usage we can read: