thantez
Hi. Suppose that I have this map:
session = %{
user: %{
get_image: fn -> %{image: "abcd.jpg"} end
}
}
And I want to get image name by pattern matching like this:
%{user: get_image.(): %{image: image}} = session
IO.inspect image # I expect this result: "abdc.jpg"
# but I will get unexpected token error.
How can I do that?
On other words, I want to pattern matching on result of calling get_images. Without pattern matching we can do this and it will work:
IO.inspect session.user.get_image.().image # result is: "abcd.jpg"
PS: I think that this approach is not according to functional paradigm, but I want to know that is this possible or not!
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 2- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
dorgan
Pattern matching is useful to match on the shape of data and maybe extract data from it.
What you’re trying to do is to match on a pattern and also run functions in a pattern.
It’s also not clear what you’re trying to do and this looks like an XY Problem
In this map, the
get_imagefield is a function, but here:The syntax is not valid, and also they look like completely different data structures, since in the pattern you expect another map to be in the user map.
From your last snippet:
I may be wrong, but it looks like you’re trying to have code that looks like it would do in an OOP language. It’s not clear why would a
get_imagefunction exist in a data structure that holds data about the user. It may make sense in the OOP world where classes mix data and behaviour and objects kind of know how to work with themselves, but in functional land this doesn’t hold.Let’s say you have a user map that looks like this:
user = %{image: nil}And your session:
session = %{user: user}If you want to populate the user’s
imagefield, you need a function to do that:It takes a user, and updates the
imagefield.So now that you have that function, you need to use it to update the user inside the session, you can do that with
update_inorput_in:session = update_in(session.user, get_image)It will run
get_imagein the user and return the updated sessionNow that you have your session populated, in some other part of your code you can use pattern matching to extract the image from it:
What I’m trying to show is that transforming data and pattern matching are two completely different things, so you should work with them separately. When you’re in a pattern, you’re not building new data, you’re, well, defining a pattern. At the point you pattern match, the data was already transformed and you want to know something about it or assert it has a given shape.
Dusty
If you pattern match, you generally won’t need a function to get the image, because you can capture the value of
imagewhenever you pass the session as a parameter: