thantez
Hi. Suppose that I have this map:
session = %{
user: %{
get_image: fn -> %{image: "abcd.jpg"} end
}
}
And I want to get image name by pattern matching like this:
%{user: get_image.(): %{image: image}} = session
IO.inspect image # I expect this result: "abdc.jpg"
# but I will get unexpected token error.
How can I do that?
On other words, I want to pattern matching on result of calling get_images. Without pattern matching we can do this and it will work:
IO.inspect session.user.get_image.().image # result is: "abcd.jpg"
PS: I think that this approach is not according to functional paradigm, but I want to know that is this possible or not!
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #performance











Showing Posts 1 to 2- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
dorgan
Pattern matching is useful to match on the shape of data and maybe extract data from it.
What you’re trying to do is to match on a pattern and also run functions in a pattern.
It’s also not clear what you’re trying to do and this looks like an XY Problem
In this map, the
get_imagefield is a function, but here:The syntax is not valid, and also they look like completely different data structures, since in the pattern you expect another map to be in the user map.
From your last snippet:
I may be wrong, but it looks like you’re trying to have code that looks like it would do in an OOP language. It’s not clear why would a
get_imagefunction exist in a data structure that holds data about the user. It may make sense in the OOP world where classes mix data and behaviour and objects kind of know how to work with themselves, but in functional land this doesn’t hold.Let’s say you have a user map that looks like this:
user = %{image: nil}And your session:
session = %{user: user}If you want to populate the user’s
imagefield, you need a function to do that:It takes a user, and updates the
imagefield.So now that you have that function, you need to use it to update the user inside the session, you can do that with
update_inorput_in:session = update_in(session.user, get_image)It will run
get_imagein the user and return the updated sessionNow that you have your session populated, in some other part of your code you can use pattern matching to extract the image from it:
What I’m trying to show is that transforming data and pattern matching are two completely different things, so you should work with them separately. When you’re in a pattern, you’re not building new data, you’re, well, defining a pattern. At the point you pattern match, the data was already transformed and you want to know something about it or assert it has a given shape.
Dusty
If you pattern match, you generally won’t need a function to get the image, because you can capture the value of
imagewhenever you pass the session as a parameter: