sharkmyster
I’m working on a game app that has an answers table and a categories table. This relationship is many to many.
The admins for the app can add answers and categories individually using usual controller format. However, I want to create a way to bulk associate answers to categories. On a category page there is a textarea to receive a comma separated list of strings. Upon hitting submit, I want to achieve the following steps,
- assess if any of the strings already exist as an answer
- for any that do not exist, create an record in the answers table
- for all the answers that were given, create the association in the join table
Here is my attempt.
def put_answers_to_category(category, answers_string) do
answers =
answers_string
|> parse_answers_string()
|> find_existing_and_create_new()
old_category =
category
|> Repo.preload(:answers)
|> IO.inspect()
category
|> Ecto.Changeset.change()
|> Ecto.Changeset.put_assoc(:answers, Enum.uniq(answers ++ old_category.answers))
|> IO.inspect()
|> Repo.update()
end
def parse_answers_string(answers_string) do
answers_string
|> String.split(",", trim: true)
|> Enum.map(&String.trim/1)
|> Enum.reject(&(&1 == ""))
end
def find_existing_and_create_new(answers_list) do
existing_answers =
Answer
|> where([a], a.raw in ^answers_list)
|> Repo.all()
existing_answers_raw = Enum.map(existing_answers, & &1.raw)
new_answers =
answers_list
|> Enum.filter(fn ans -> !Enum.member?(existing_answers_raw, ans) end)
|> Enum.map(fn ans -> %{raw: ans} end)
|> Enum.map(&create_answer/1)
|> Enum.map(fn {:ok, answer} -> answer end)
existing_answers ++ new_answers
end
This seems to be working but I think it may be verbose/inefficient. I’ve read the docs around cast_assoc and put_assoc but I couldn’t quite find a better way. Is there a better/more efficient way to do this?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 2- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
tfwright
As far as Ecto goes, I think that your implementation is the proper way to approach updating a
many_to_many. But that really just means usingput_assocwith an array of the set of answer records you want the category changeset to have.The rest of the complexity here comes from the bulk upsert on the answer text param, but changing that would require a different API design. For example, a more conventional
many_to_manyupdate would take the answer ids directly, requiring them to all already exist. For example, the FE could be upserting them individually as they are entered via another endpoint.Don’t know enough about your requirements to comment on whether that would be better overall, but I would say that you lose a significant advantage of your current approach by creating the new answers in a separate DB transaction (AFAICT), which means if the category update never goes through for whatever reason (validation error) the new answers will still be around in your DB, which may be unexpected.
sharkmyster
Thank you, this was helpful.