PJUllrich
Author of Building Table Views with Phoenix LiveView
I’m currently playing around with GenServers and for a totally unrealistic, but still interesting problem, I wondered whether there is a faster way of spawing 40.000+ processes than this:
pids = for id <- 1..40_000 do
{:ok, pid} = GenServer.start_link(MyGenServerModule, id: id)
pid
end
Since this for-loop runs synchronously, it takes around 10 to 12 seconds on my macBook to spawn all 40k processes. I wondered, whether this could somehow be achieved asynchronously?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
hauleth
You want just to spawn them or get their PIDs as well? Should these processes be inside supervision tree?
PJUllrich
I need their I PIDs to send messages to them. A supervisor is not needed. I want to spawn them inside a LiveView process and have them linked to that LV process.
princemaple
1..40_000 |> Task.async_stream(fn _ → YOUR_CODE end) |> Enum.to_list
Not sure what evil thing you are trying to do… I won’t ask
PJUllrich
Thank you! That indeed decreased the execution time from ~12s to ~1.2s, but unfortunately, I believe the processes weren’t linked to the original process correctly. Maybe because the
GenServer.start_link/2was called inside theTask.async_stream? Will those processes then correctly be linked to the “parent process” in which I used to call theGenServer.start_link/2function originally?PS: I’m currently playing around with simulating the Game of Life with 50.000 erlang processes. Because, why not?
princemaple
Hi, That’s pretty cool.
To link the process to your main process, you can do this:
1..40_000 |> Task.async_stream(fn _ -> YOUR_CODE end) |> Enum.map(fn {:ok, pid} -> Process.link(pid) end)PJUllrich
Unfortunately, that took even longer than the sequential loop. Sequential was 12s and this version was something between 60 and 85s
I decided on using the sequential version now, but thank you anyway 
Sebb
how about starting the processes in some
DynamicSupervisors?princemaple
That’s weird. On my machine they hardly differ.
qhwa
Spawning processes, even GenServer processes, is fast in Elixir. I just wrote this script based on your code to test:
The output I got:
So maybe you’re doing too much work in the
init/1callback? If true, you can move the hard work into ahandle_info/2callback, by sending a message to self in the init callback. For example:Edit:
:conitunetuple mentioned by @lud is better.lud
I played with that problem and had 4 processes spawn 10 processes spawn 10 processes spawn 10 processes, etc, to spawn 40K processes.
It is fast, but not that much faster than spawning them sequentially. And if you do that then I don’t know how you could supervise those processes.
For better synchronization I would pick a timestamp 3 seconds in the future, spawn all processes sequentially and have them wait that precise timestamp to start the logic in sync.
Here is my test code: