Fl4m3Ph03n1x

Fl4m3Ph03n1x

Background

I have a Phoenix application, freshly created. This app has an endpoint that makes a request to an external service, and I would like to exercise/test the entire stack vertically.

To achieve this I have opted to try bypass to mock responses from the external service.

What I tried

To achieve this I have come up with the following code:

defmodule MyApp.ApplicationTest do
  @moduledoc false

  use ExUnit.Case, async: false

  alias HTTPoison

  @external_service_port 5112

  setup do
    bypass = Bypass.open(port: @external_service_port)

    {:ok, bypass: bypass}
  end

  test "client can handle an error response", %{bypass: bypass} do
    Bypass.expect_once(bypass, "GET", "api/users/validate", fn conn ->
      Plug.Conn.resp(conn, 429, ~s<{"errors": [{"code": 88, "message": "Rate limit exceeded"}]}>)
    end)

    MyApp.Application.start(nil, nil) |> IO.inspect(label: "APPLICATION STARTUP")

    HTTPoison.get("http://localhost:4000/api/users/validate") |> IO.inspect(label: "REQUEST")
  end
end

Problem

Unfortunately, when I run the test this is the output I get:

❯ mix test test/my_app/application_test.exs 
APPLICATION STARTUP: {:error, {:already_started, #PID<0.404.0>}}
REQUEST: {:error, %HTTPoison.Error{reason: :econnrefused, id: nil}}

My understanding is that the application is already started, but somehow I cannot reach it and I don’t know why.

Questions

  1. Is this the correct way to exercise the entire stack using ByPass with Phoenix?
  2. Is there a better way of testing this?
  3. Why can’t I access my application?

Showing Posts 1 to 10

fuelen

fuelen

You don’t need to start MyApp.Application manually. mix does this for you. Check mix.exs file, probably it has something like this:

def application do
  [
    mod: {MyApp.Application, []},
    # ...
  ]
end

Bypass started a server using port 5112, but you’re making requests to 4000

Fl4m3Ph03n1x

Fl4m3Ph03n1x OP

I am confused then. My objective is to use bypass to simulate the response from the external service (which uses port 5112). Port 4000 is the default port for when I use mix phx.server.

Does this mean that both my application (usually at port 4000) and the external service I am trying to simulate, are both in port 5112?

If so, how do I make bypass distinguish between them?

mudasobwa

mudasobwa

Creator of Cure

bypass obviously cannot mock external ports, it injects a plug into your server pipeline, that’s it.

Fl4m3Ph03n1x

Fl4m3Ph03n1x OP

So, this means I cannot use bypass to mock responses from an external service while also using HTTTPoison to directly call my application, correct?

The best I could do is to directly call the validate function in MyApp.ValidateController and then use bypass to mock the response from the external service said controller would eventually call, right?

mudasobwa

mudasobwa

Creator of Cure

I am not sure I see any advantage of using bypass over mox here.

I would do the following: mock HTTPoison.Base behaviour with mox. Make an HTTP client configurable, and point the configuration to your Mox module for HTTPoison in test env, and to HTTPoison otherwise. Do return whatever you want from the mocks.

nivanson

nivanson

I’ve been using test_server for this purpose. It’s not perfect but it is pretty good.

See GitHub - danschultzer/test_server: No fuzz ExUnit test server to mock third party services · GitHub

Fl4m3Ph03n1x

Fl4m3Ph03n1x OP

Isn’t this the same as bypass?
Meaning, if I use testserver I will not be able to call my app’s endpoints while simulating the third party, correct?

ananthakumaran

ananthakumaran

Bypass starts an HTTP server, it doesn’t mock anything. I think OP’s issue is about using HTTPoison to hit his own service. This should be done via plug test module.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

One can also test ones own endpoint with an http client, but that requires actually binding the endpoint to a port, which is not the default. Adding server: true for the endpoint in config/test.exs would enable that. I’d only do that for integration tests though, as indeed plug level tests are usually fine and have the better DX especially around thing going wrong.

nivanson

nivanson

I don’t understand what you are asking. Why would you not be able to call your own application server?

You would be running your own server for your application. If your endpoint is running you should be able to hit it as usual. Test server does not change that. It is an entirely different server running on a different port. Your test can hit either your server or the test server.

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
georgeguimaraes
Just published claude-code-elixir, a plugin marketplace for Claude Code with Elixir support. These are the plugins I’ve been using for my...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews