jarlah

jarlah

I’m trying to find out how to test live views that are protected by Ash Authentication.

A straight forward way is to just fill in username and password and hit submit when visiting a protected page.

In my normal live view code I have this function in my conn_case.ex

  def log_in_user(conn, user) do
    token = ActivityPlanner.Accounts.generate_user_session_token(user)

    conn
    |> Phoenix.ConnTest.init_test_session(%{})
    |> Plug.Conn.put_session(:user_token, token)
  end

But this is using the custom auth stuff generated from gen.auth.

How can make something similar for Ash Authentication ? I think that’s maybe one of the problems with opaque code. Oh and yes I could probably peer into the source code, but currently I’m just whipping out some code and tries to avoid rabbit holes :slight_smile:

the ash project im working on is this GitHub - jarlah/ash-activity-planner · GitHub and the original project I worked on previously with normal live views is this one GitHub - jarlah/activity-planner: An example Phoenix application with foreign key multi tenancy · GitHub

Both of which are hobby projects with sole purpose to grind my way into getting familiar with all of Elixir :wink:

Showing Posts 1 to 10

jarlah

jarlah OP

I really struggle with this. Because of the opaqueness of ash authentication phoenix I cant use the same form(“#my-form-name”, %{username: “foo”, password: “bar”}) strategy for filling the form fields and submitting with render_submit(). Anyone used ash authentication before and know how to either 1) mock the session in the test, or 2) how to fill in the SignInLive form fields in ash authentication phoenix ?

zachdaniel

zachdaniel

Creator of Ash

I haven’t personally tested live views protected with AshAuthentication unfortunately. @jimsynz will probably be able to provide some more info after the weekend. You may have some luck looking at the test suite for AshAuthenticationPhoenix?

jimsynz

jimsynz

Ash Core Team

Hi there.

You can rewrite the log_in_user/2 function to use AshAuthentication in a few ways. Here I am assuming that your user resource is called User - if it is something else you will need to change current_user to current_X.

If your application is using retrieve_from_session/2 (possibly via AshAuthentication.Phoenix.Plug.load_from_session/2) and has require_token_presence_for_authentication? set:

def log_in_user(conn, user) do
  {:ok, token, _} = AshAuthentication.Jwt.token_for_user(user)

  conn
  |> Phoenix.ConnTest.init_test_session(%{})
  |> Plug.Conn.put_session("current_user_token", token)
end

If your application is using retrieve_from_session/2 and doesn’t have require_token_presence_for_authentication? set:

def log_in_user(conn, user) do
  subject = AshAuthentication.user_to_subject(user)

  conn
  |> Phoenix.ConnTest.init_test_session(%{})
  |> Plug.Conn.put_session("current_user", subject)
end

Lastly, if you’re using retrieve_from_bearer/2 (possibly via AshAuthentication.Phoenix.Plug.load_from_bearer/2) you can do:

def log_in_user(conn, user) do
  {:ok, token, _} = AshAuthentication.Jwt.token_for_user(user)

  conn
  |> Plug.Conn.put_req_header("authorization", "Bearer #{token}")
end

All of this information is introspectable via AshAuthentication.Info - so I would welcome a PR that adds some test helpers to AshAuthentication.

Links:

  1. AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrieve_from_session/2
  2. AshAuthentication.Phoenix.Plug.load_from_session/2
  3. authentication.tokens.require_token_presence_for_authentication?
  4. AshAuthentication.Jwt.token_for_user/3
  5. AshAuthentication.user_to_subject/1
  6. AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrieve_from_bearer/2
  7. AshAuthentication.Phoenix.Plug.load_from_bearer/2
  8. AshAuthentication.Info
zachdaniel

zachdaniel

Creator of Ash

A test helper like that sounds like an excellent addition to AshAuthentication! Good idea.

jarlah

jarlah OP

after a lot of trial and error, and inspecting the connection after login, I saw that a “user” was stored in the session in the form of

      "user" => "user?id=ef6f74a3-3795-4f0d-be4f-622db62f8c01"

so I made it all work in the tests by doing this:

  setup %{conn: conn} do
    user =
      AshActivityPlanner.Accounts.User
      |> Ash.Changeset.for_create(:register_with_password, %{
        email: "test@user.com",
        password: "password",
        password_confirmation: "password"
      })
      |> AshActivityPlanner.Accounts.create!()

    {:ok, %{conn: log_in_user_as_subject(conn, user)}}
  end

  # SNIP ...

  defp log_in_user_as_subject(conn, user) do
    subject = AshAuthentication.user_to_subject(user)

    conn
    |> Phoenix.ConnTest.init_test_session(%{})
    |> Plug.Conn.put_session("user", subject)
  end
jarlah

jarlah OP

however this will likely change when I alter how signin is configured so its not a good longterm solution.

peterhartman

peterhartman

Thank you @jarlah this was perfect help. I made my own variant using describe setup blocks which I include below in case others might find it useful (or suggest improvements).

defmodule TvpNgWeb.UserDashboardLiveTest do
  @moduledoc """
  Test the user dashboard
  """
  use TvpNgWeb.ConnCase, async: true
  import Phoenix.ConnTest
  import Phoenix.LiveViewTest

  describe "user IS logged in" do
    setup [:create_test_user, :log_user_in]

    test "and the user dashboard has a title", %{conn: conn} do
      {:ok, view, _html} = live(conn, "/dashboard")
      assert view |> has_element?("#dashboard_title", "WYL")
      # open_browser(view)
    end
  end

  describe "user is NOT logged in" do
    test "so you have to sign in to get to the dashboard", %{conn: conn} do
      assert {:error, {:redirect, %{to: "/sign-in"}}} = live(conn, "/dashboard")
    end
  end

  defp create_test_user(%{conn: conn}) do
    user =
      TvpNg.Accounts.User
      |> Ash.Changeset.for_create(:register_with_password, %{
        email: "test@user.com",
        password: "password",
        password_confirmation: "password"
      })
      |> TvpNg.Accounts.create!()

    %{user: user, conn: conn}
  end

  defp log_user_in(%{user: user, conn: conn}) do
    subject = AshAuthentication.user_to_subject(user)

    %{conn:
     conn
     |> Phoenix.ConnTest.init_test_session(%{})
     |> Plug.Conn.put_session("user", subject)}
  end
end

nheingit

nheingit

Just saying this is what worked for me. Maybe mark this as the “answer”?

Thanks a lot for the investigation you went through, this saved me a bunch of time.

brunoripa

brunoripa

Hi :wave: !

I have a slightly different implementation for my log_in_user:

    strategy = AshAuthentication.Info.strategy!(User, :password)

    assert {:ok, %User{} = user} =
             AshAuthentication.Strategy.action(strategy, :sign_in, %{
               email: email,
               password: password
             })

    conn
    |> Phoenix.ConnTest.init_test_session(%{})
    |> store_in_session(user)

I am leveraging the strategy so that I will be detecting any change in the resource if any, and also I am using the store_in_session function coming from AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers, which will protect me from any eventual future change in the api.

Do you see any counterargument for such an implementation ?

Thanks :slight_smile:

jimsynz

jimsynz

Ash Core Team

I think it’s fine.

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews