jarlah
I’m trying to find out how to test live views that are protected by Ash Authentication.
A straight forward way is to just fill in username and password and hit submit when visiting a protected page.
In my normal live view code I have this function in my conn_case.ex
def log_in_user(conn, user) do
token = ActivityPlanner.Accounts.generate_user_session_token(user)
conn
|> Phoenix.ConnTest.init_test_session(%{})
|> Plug.Conn.put_session(:user_token, token)
end
But this is using the custom auth stuff generated from gen.auth.
How can make something similar for Ash Authentication ? I think that’s maybe one of the problems with opaque code. Oh and yes I could probably peer into the source code, but currently I’m just whipping out some code and tries to avoid rabbit holes ![]()
the ash project im working on is this GitHub - jarlah/ash-activity-planner · GitHub and the original project I worked on previously with normal live views is this one GitHub - jarlah/activity-planner: An example Phoenix application with foreign key multi tenancy · GitHub
Both of which are hobby projects with sole purpose to grind my way into getting familiar with all of Elixir ![]()
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
jarlah
I really struggle with this. Because of the opaqueness of ash authentication phoenix I cant use the same form(“#my-form-name”, %{username: “foo”, password: “bar”}) strategy for filling the form fields and submitting with render_submit(). Anyone used ash authentication before and know how to either 1) mock the session in the test, or 2) how to fill in the SignInLive form fields in ash authentication phoenix ?
zachdaniel
I haven’t personally tested live views protected with AshAuthentication unfortunately. @jimsynz will probably be able to provide some more info after the weekend. You may have some luck looking at the test suite for
AshAuthenticationPhoenix?jimsynz
Hi there.
You can rewrite the
log_in_user/2function to useAshAuthenticationin a few ways. Here I am assuming that your user resource is calledUser- if it is something else you will need to changecurrent_usertocurrent_X.If your application is using
retrieve_from_session/2(possibly viaAshAuthentication.Phoenix.Plug.load_from_session/2) and hasrequire_token_presence_for_authentication?set:If your application is using
retrieve_from_session/2and doesn’t haverequire_token_presence_for_authentication?set:Lastly, if you’re using
retrieve_from_bearer/2(possibly viaAshAuthentication.Phoenix.Plug.load_from_bearer/2) you can do:All of this information is introspectable via
AshAuthentication.Info- so I would welcome a PR that adds some test helpers to AshAuthentication.Links:
AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrieve_from_session/2AshAuthentication.Phoenix.Plug.load_from_session/2authentication.tokens.require_token_presence_for_authentication?AshAuthentication.Jwt.token_for_user/3AshAuthentication.user_to_subject/1AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrieve_from_bearer/2AshAuthentication.Phoenix.Plug.load_from_bearer/2AshAuthentication.Infozachdaniel
A test helper like that sounds like an excellent addition to AshAuthentication! Good idea.
jarlah
after a lot of trial and error, and inspecting the connection after login, I saw that a “user” was stored in the session in the form of
so I made it all work in the tests by doing this:
jarlah
however this will likely change when I alter how signin is configured so its not a good longterm solution.
peterhartman
Thank you @jarlah this was perfect help. I made my own variant using
describesetup blocks which I include below in case others might find it useful (or suggest improvements).nheingit
Just saying this is what worked for me. Maybe mark this as the “answer”?
Thanks a lot for the investigation you went through, this saved me a bunch of time.
brunoripa
Hi
!
I have a slightly different implementation for my
log_in_user:I am leveraging the strategy so that I will be detecting any change in the resource if any, and also I am using the
store_in_sessionfunction coming fromAshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers, which will protect me from any eventual future change in the api.Do you see any counterargument for such an implementation ?
Thanks
jimsynz
I think it’s fine.