Suppose I’ve a tensor like this:

```
f32[3][3][2]
[
[
[0.0, 0.0],
[0.0, 1.0],
[0.0, 2.0]
],
[
[1.0, 0.0],
[1.0, 1.0],
[1.0, 2.0]
],
[
[2.0, 0.0],
[2.0, 1.0],
[2.0, 2.0]
]
]
```

Is there a way to use the two values of axis 2 as parameters of a function and use the returned value to create a tensor of shape f32[3][3]?

I tried reduce, but it works just iterating along the axis and not just taking the values right?

This will depend a lot on what you’re trying to achieve.

Some functions, such as `Nx.sum`

, `Nx.reduce_max`

and `Nx.product`

accept `:axes`

as options. You can check examples here: https://github.com/elixir-nx/nx/blob/main/nx/guides/tensor-aggregation-101.livemd

However, if you have a more complex function that works in `{2}`

-shaped tensors, and you want to treat your `{3, 3, 2}`

tensor as a collection of those, you could approach it via vectorization: https://github.com/elixir-nx/nx/blob/main/nx/guides/vectorization.livemd

It seems good, but from this point I don’t understand how can I iterate throught my collection of `{2}`

-shaped tensors and call a function for each of them, `Nx.map`

still take alone elements instead the `{2}`

-shaped tensors. I searched in Nx docs but no success.

The idea would for you to implement a function that takes in a `{2}`

shaped tensor, and then vectorize a collection to pass down to it.

For example:

```
iex(2)> fun = fn x -> Nx.add(x[0], x[1]) end
#Function<42.125776118/1 in :erl_eval.expr/6>
iex(3)> Nx.Defn.jit_apply(fun, [Nx.tensor([10, 20])])
#Nx.Tensor<
s64
30
>
iex(4)> t2 = Nx.tensor([[10, 20], [30, 40], [-10, -20], [-30, -40]])
#Nx.Tensor<
s64[4][2]
[
[10, 20],
[30, 40],
[-10, -20],
[-30, -40]
]
>
iex(5)> Nx.Defn.jit_apply(fun, [t2])
#Nx.Tensor<
s64[2]
[40, 60]
>
iex(6)> Nx.Defn.jit_apply(fun, [Nx.vectorize(t2, :rows)])
#Nx.Tensor<
vectorized[rows: 4]
s64
[30, 70, -30, -70]
>
```

Notice how vectorizing the input changes how the function reacts to the tensor and yields the sum of each row

Sorry for taking so long, this was a great help, I finally solved my problem. Thank you very much Paulo.

1 Like