OctopusRage

OctopusRage

hey guys im quite new using membrane, i want to use membrane webrtc to utilize my webrtc call (audio only)

here’s my pipeline

  @impl true
  def handle_init(_ctx, opts) do
    spec =
      child(:webrtc_source, %Membrane.WebRTC.Source{
        signaling: opts[:ingress_signaling]
      })
      |> via_out(:output, options: [kind: :audio])
      |> child(%Membrane.Transcoder{output_stream_format: Membrane.Opus})
      |> child(:audio_realtimer, Membrane.Realtimer)
      |> via_in(:input, options: [kind: :audio])
      |> child(:webrtc_sink, %Membrane.WebRTC.Sink{
        signaling: opts[:egress_signaling]
      })

    {[spec: spec], %{}}
  end

and here’s my channels code

  @impl true
  def join("call:" <> signaling_id, %{"call_id" => call_id, "role" => role} = payload, socket) when role in ["ingress", "egress"] do
    PhoenixSignaling.register_channel(signaling_id)
    signaling = PhoenixSignaling.Registry.get(signaling_id)
    c_pid = CallHandler.new(call_id)
    if role == "egress" do
      CallHandler.add_egress(c_pid, signaling_id, signaling)
    else
      CallHandler.add_ingress(c_pid, signaling_id, signaling)
    end
    socket = assign(socket, :signaling_id, signaling_id)
    {:ok, socket}
  end


  @impl true
  def handle_in(signaling_id, msg, socket) do
    IO.inspect({:receive_frombrows, signaling_id, msg})
    # msg = Jason.decode!(msg)
    PhoenixSignaling.signal(signaling_id, msg)
    {:noreply, socket}
  end

  @impl true
  def handle_info({:membrane_webrtc_signaling, _pid, msg, _metadata}, socket) do
    IO.inspect({:receive_signal, socket.assigns.signaling_id, msg})
    push(socket, socket.assigns.signaling_id, msg)
    {:noreply, socket}
  end

all my peers successfully doing handshake but media wont flow into my peers
no errors in my code either, did i make some mistake on my pipeline?

Showing Posts 7 to 1

OctopusRage

OctopusRage OP

thx for the insight @varsill , ill take a look

varsill

varsill

Membrane Core Team

I see, so as I mentioned before - each of the Membrane.WebRTC.Source and Membrane.WebRTC.Sink elements supports only either inbound our outbound traffic for a single PeerConnection, but not both at the time.

However it’s possible to write a Membrane component based on ex_webrtc that would handle both inbound and outbound tracks with a single PeerConnection - you can take a look at how they did it here: membrane_rtc_engine/ex_webrtc/lib/ex_webrtc_endpoint.ex at master · fishjam-cloud/membrane_rtc_engine · GitHub .

Unfortunately it’s more complicated than handling just a single type of tracks.

OctopusRage

OctopusRage OP

yes im sure i’ll need it, because i would like to replace the ingress peer with communication to the others server peer instead of browser and it requires media to flow without opening new peer connection

varsill

varsill

Membrane Core Team

Hi once again!

Great to hear that you managed to make it work!

so my other question is, is it possible to send back audio stream to ingress peer?

Though the browser supports using a single PeerConnction to handle both egress and ingress tracks, the Membrane Elements (Membrane.WebRTC.Source and Membrane.WebRTC.Sink) allow for data transfer only in one direction. So to transfer audio back to the browser that generated it you need to create a new signalling and use it with Membrane.WebRTC.Sink just as you would do to transfer data to any other peer.

A side question - are you sure you really need to send audio to the server and then send it the back to the browser? Couldn’t it be handled internally in the browser?

OctopusRage

OctopusRage OP

hi @varsill
i finally success implementing my code! thx for the insight
the problem lies on my js code.. so my mistake is assuming that ingress peer can do both record and play
and egress peer can also do both

so my other question is, is it possible to send back audio stream to ingress peer? or i have to do it hacky way?

OctopusRage

OctopusRage OP

hey @varsill
yes browser only send audio

this is callhandler.ex looks like:

defmodule Piqeons.Rtc.CallHandler do
  alias ExWebRTC.SessionDescription
  alias PiqeonsWeb.Endpoint
  alias Piqeons.Rtc.PeerHandler2
  alias Membrane.WebRTC.Signaling
  alias Membrane.WebRTC.PhoenixSignaling
  alias Piqeons.Rtc.CallSpv
  alias Piqeons.Pipelines.RtcPipe
  use GenServer

  def new(call_id) do
    pid = CallSpv.get_call(call_id)

    if pid do
      pid
    else
      {:ok, pid} = CallSpv.spawn_call(call_id)
      pid
    end
  end

  def start_link(call_id, opts) do
    GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, call_id, opts)
  end

  @impl true
  def init(call_id) do
    {:ok,
     %{
       call_id: call_id,
       ingress: %{
         signaling: nil,
         connected: false
       },
       egress: %{
         signaling: nil,
         connected: false
       },
       started: false
     }}
  end


  def add_egress(pid, peer_id, signaling \\ nil) do
    signaling = if signaling do
      signaling
    else
      # currently unused
      {p_pid, signaling} = PeerHandler2.new(peer_id)
      PeerHandler2.register_call_pid(p_pid, pid)
      signaling
    end

    IO.inspect({:egress, peer_id})
    GenServer.call(pid, {:add_egress, signaling})
  end

  def add_ingress(pid, peer_id, signaling \\ nil) do
    signaling = if signaling do
      signaling
    else
      # currently unused
      {p_pid, signaling} = PeerHandler2.new(peer_id)
      PeerHandler2.register_call_pid(p_pid, pid)
      signaling
    end

    GenServer.call(pid, {:add_ingress, signaling})
  end


  @impl true
  def handle_call({:add_egress, signaling}, _, state) do
    state = %{state | egress: %{signaling: signaling, connected: true}}

    if !state.started and state.ingress.signaling do
      state = start_pipeline(state)
      {:reply, state.egress.signaling, state}
    else
      {:reply, state.egress.signaling, state}
    end
  end

  @impl true
  def handle_call({:add_ingress, signaling}, _, state) do
    state = %{state | ingress: %{signaling: signaling, connected: true}}

    if !state.started and state.egress.signaling do
      state = start_pipeline(state)
      {:reply, state.ingress.signaling, state}
    else
      {:reply, state.ingress.signaling, state}
    end
  end


  @impl true
  def handle_info(msg, state) do
    IO.inspect(msg)
    {:noreply, state}
  end

  defp start_pipeline(state) do
    Task.start(fn ->
      Membrane.Pipeline.start_link(RtcPipe,
        ingress_signaling: state.ingress.signaling,
        egress_signaling: state.egress.signaling
      )
    end)

    %{state | started: true}
  end
end

current state how i tested it is i open 2 different tabs: 1 tab with ingress peer and other tab is egress peer

varsill

varsill

Membrane Core Team

Hello @OctopusRage !
Could you tell where and how do you spawn your pipeline (i.e. what function do you use to spawn your pipeline) and how does the CallHandler.add_ingress/CallHandler.add_egress functions look like?
I also assume that the browser is sending only audio, isn’t it?

One tiny thing I see is that a more suggested approach would be to create a signalling with given id with PhoenixSignaling.new/1 in the place where you spawn your pipeline instead of fetching it with private PhoenixSignaling.Registry.get/1 function but I don’t think that the root of the problem.

Best wishes!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Discussions Top

AstonJ
As the title says, please share what you’ve been up to with Elixir. Whether that’s been learning it, looking into it, making stuff with i...
2977 94592 917
New
cblavier
Hey there, It’s been more than a year since we started using LiveView as our main UI library and building a whole library of UI componen...
New
heathen
Quite interesting article Google brought me. Didn’t find any mentions about it here. What do you think in general? Would you use togethe...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
AstonJ
Since we have deprecated our Erlang sections (as we have dedicated Erlang Forums now) let’s add this thread for those who’d like to post ...
New
Null-logic-0
What IDE or editor are you using for Elixir development? Personally, I use Zed, and I really like it, but sometimes I wish there were a ...
New
maennchen
:warning: Security advisory: Decimal DoS vulnerability A vulnerability has been published for decimal where very large exponents can cau...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews