stevensonmt
In most cases Elixir and Erlang intrinsically moving to BigInt is remarkably helpful and satisfying to work with, so I know this exercise is academic. Still if I wanted to work with integers as if they were restricted to signed 32-bit integers, how would I handle overflow/wrapping?
I’m thinking the easiest way is working with integers as binaries, something like:
x = Integer.pow(2, 32) - 1
<<x:32>> # returns <<255, 255, 255, 255>>
y = 1
<<y:32>> # returns <<0, 0, 0, 1>>
If I try to do <<(x + y)::32>> I’ll get <<0, 0, 0, 0>>. What’s the best way to capture that overflow digit?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Is there any way to avoid the Hologram compiler running when using iex? It seems like the front-end code could potentially be disregarded...
New
** (ArgumentError) expected :max_attempts to be a positive integer, got: {:@, [line: 10, column: 19], [{:max_attempts, [line: 10, column:...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Just published claude-code-elixir, a plugin marketplace for Claude Code with Elixir support. These are the plugins I’ve been using for my...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
hauleth
You want to capture overflow or to have wrapping addition? Because in wrapping addition
0xFFFF_FFFF + 1 == 0not1.stevensonmt
Imprecise wording on my part, sorry. I meant how do I convert <<0,0,0,0>> (or whatever the wrapped result is) back to an integer.
Is there a better way to get z into integer form without iterating over the binary as a list and reducing?
akash-akya
If you want to treat bitstring as an unsigned-integer, and by default it will be an unsigned integer if we dont specify anything.
But from your original description, it seems like you are interested in signed integer. For that it will be
hauleth
Bitwise.band/2lud
maybe with
binary:decode_unsignedhauleth
Earlier I was on mobile, now I can expand.
Addition of two N-bit integers can result with at most (N+1)-bit integer. So as we are adding 32-bit integers then we will end with at most 33-bit result. That will give us the knowledge to achieve what we want: